scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Kansas

EducationLawrence, Kansas, United States
About: University of Kansas is a education organization based out in Lawrence, Kansas, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 38183 authors who have published 81381 publications receiving 2986312 citations. The organization is also known as: KU & Univ of Kansas.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
01 May 1990-Blood
TL;DR: The studies indicate that the serum receptor measurement is of particular value in identifying mild iron deficiency of recent onset and was a more sensitive and reliable guide to the degree of functional iron deficiency than either the FEP or MCV.

706 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although in the past, gender discrimination was an important cause of women’s underrepresentation in scientific academic careers, this claim has continued to be invoked after it has ceased being a valid cause, and the results reveal that early sex differences in spatial and mathematical reasoning need not stem from biological bases.
Abstract: Summary Much has been written in the past two decades about women in academic science careers, but this literature is contradictory. Many analyses have revealed a level playing field, with men and women faring equally, whereas other analyses have suggested numerous areas in which the playing field is not level. The only widely-agreed-upon conclusion is that women are underrepresented in college majors, graduate school programs, and the professoriate in those fields that are the most mathematically intensive, such as geoscience, engineering, economics, mathematics/ computer science, and the physical sciences. In other scientific fields (psychology, life science, social science), women are found in much higher percentages. In this monograph, we undertake extensive life-course analyses comparing the trajectories of women and men in math-intensive fields with those of their counterparts in non-math-intensive fields in which women are close to parity with or even exceed the number of men. We begin by examining early-childhood differences in spatial processing and follow this through quantitative performance in middle childhood and adolescence, including high school coursework. We then focus on the transition of the sexes from high school to college major, then to graduate school, and, finally, to careers in academic science. The results of our myriad analyses reveal that early sex differences in spatial and mathematical reasoning need not stem from biological bases, that the gap between average female and male math ability is narrowing (suggesting strong environmental influences), and that sex differences in math ability at the right tail show variation over time and across nationalities, ethnicities, and other factors, indicating that the ratio of males to females at the right tail can and does change. We find that gender differences in attitudes toward and expectations about math careers and ability (controlling for actual ability) are evident by kindergarten and increase thereafter, leading to lower female propensities to major in math-intensive subjects in college but higher female propensities to major in non-math-intensive sciences, with overall science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors at 50% female for more than a decade. Post-college, although men with majors in math-intensive subjects have historically chosen and completed PhDs in these fields more often than women, the gap has recently narrowed by two thirds; among non-math-intensive STEM majors, women are more likely than men to go into health and other people-related occupations instead of pursuing PhDs. Importantly, of those who obtain doctorates in math-intensive fields, men and women entering the professoriate have equivalent access to tenure-track academic jobs in science, and they persist and are remunerated at comparable rates—with some caveats that we discuss. The transition from graduate programs to assistant professorships shows more pipeline leakage in the fields in which women are already very prevalent (psychology, life science, social science) than in the math-intensive fields in which they are underrepresented but in which the number of females holding assistant professorships is at least commensurate with (if not greater than) that of males. That is, invitations to interview for tenure-track positions in math-intensive fields—as well as actual employment offers—reveal that female PhD applicants fare at least as well as their male counterparts in math-intensive fields.

701 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An architectural framework for resilience and survivability in communication networks is provided and a survey of the disciplines that resilience encompasses is provided, along with significant past failures of the network infrastructure.

698 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: GRAMM-X and its web interface extend the original GRAMM Fast Fourier Transformation methodology by employing smoothed potentials, refinement stage, and knowledge-based scoring and frees users from complex installation of database-dependent parallel software and maintaining large hardware resources needed for protein docking simulations.
Abstract: Protein docking software GRAMM-X and its web interface (http://vakser.bioinformatics.ku.edu/resources/gramm/grammx) extend the original GRAMM Fast Fourier Transformation methodology by employing smoothed potentials, refinement stage, and knowledge-based scoring. The web server frees users from complex installation of database-dependent parallel software and maintaining large hardware resources needed for protein docking simulations. Docking problems submitted to GRAMM-X server are processed by a 320 processor Linux cluster. The server was extensively tested by benchmarking, several months of public use, and participation in the CAPRI server track.

697 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A critical assessment of the current status of cyclodextrins in the formulation and delivery of pharmaceuticals and commentary on their potential future uses is presented.
Abstract: Since their discovery, cyclodextrins and their ability to form inclusion complexes have fascinated chemists, formulators and recently, entrepreneurs. This mini-review has as its objective, a critical assessment of the current status of cyclodextrins in the formulation and delivery of pharmaceuticals and commentary on their potential future uses. The emphasis will be on answers to common questions often asked of pharmaceutical scientists working in this area. Why use cyclodextrins for drug solubilization and stabilization when alternative techniques are available? Why the greater interest in modified cyclodextrins and not the parent cyclodextrins? If a drug forms a strong cyclodextrin inclusion complex, how is the drug releasedin vivo? Does the injection of a cyclodextrin/drug complex alter the pharmacokinetics of the drug? Are there drug products on the market which contain cyclodextrins? What is the regulatory status of cyclodextrins? Although definitive answers to all these questions are not possible at this time, many of these questions are answerable, and educated and informed responses are possible for the rest.

697 citations


Authors

Showing all 38401 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Gordon H. Guyatt2311620228631
Krzysztof Matyjaszewski1691431128585
Wei Li1581855124748
David Tilman158340149473
Tomas Hökfelt158103395979
Pete Smith1562464138819
Daniel J. Rader1551026107408
Melody A. Swartz1481304103753
Kevin Murphy146728120475
Carlo Rovelli1461502103550
Stephen Sanders1451385105943
Marco Zanetti1451439104610
Andrei Gritsan1431531135398
Gunther Roland1411471100681
Joseph T. Hupp14173182647
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Minnesota
257.9K papers, 11.9M citations

96% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

95% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

95% related

Duke University
200.3K papers, 10.7M citations

95% related

University of Michigan
342.3K papers, 17.6M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202391
2022358
20214,211
20204,204
20193,766
20183,485