scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Lisbon

EducationLisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
About: University of Lisbon is a education organization based out in Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 19122 authors who have published 48503 publications receiving 1102623 citations. The organization is also known as: Universidade de Lisboa & Lisbon University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that smaller electrodes required slightly less current to achieve a constant value of the current density at a reference point on the brain surface located directly under the electrode center, and electrodes with areas in the range 3.5-12 cm(2) may provide a better compromise between focality and current density in the scalp than the traditional electrodes.
Abstract: We investigated the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). For this purpose, we used the finite element method to compute the distribution of the current density in a four-layered spherical head model using various electrode montages, corresponding to a range of electrode sizes and inter-electrode distances. We found that smaller electrodes required slightly less current to achieve a constant value of the current density at a reference point on the brain surface located directly under the electrode center. Under these conditions, smaller electrodes also produced a more focal current density distribution in the brain, i.e. the magnitude of the current density fell more rapidly with distance from the reference point. The combination of two electrodes with different areas produced an asymmetric current distribution that could lead to more effective and localized neural modulation under the smaller electrode than under the larger one. Focality improved rapidly with decreasing electrode size when the larger electrode sizes were considered but the improvement was less marked for the smaller electrode sizes. Also, focality was not affected significantly by inter-electrode distance unless two large electrodes were placed close together. Increasing the inter-electrode distance resulted in decreased shunting of the current through the scalp and the cerebrospinal fluid, and decreasing electrode area resulted in increased current density on the scalp under the edges of the electrode. Our calculations suggest that when working with conventional electrodes (25-35 cm(2)), one of the electrodes should be placed just 'behind' the target relative to the other electrode, for maximum current density on the target. Also electrodes with areas in the range 3.5-12 cm(2) may provide a better compromise between focality and current density in the scalp than the traditional electrodes. Finally, the use of multiple small return electrodes may be more efficient than the use of a single large return electrode.

212 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, Fernandez-Palacios, Rosalina Gabriel, Roy E. Gereau, Rosemary G. Gillespie, Josef Greimler, David E.V. Harter, Tsurng-Juhn Huang, Severin D.H. Irl, Daniel Jeanmonod, Anke Jentsch, Christoph Kueffer, Sandra Nogue, Rudiger Otto, Jonathan Price, Maria M. Romeiras, Dominique Strasberg, Tod Stuessy, Jens-Christian Svenning, Ole R.
Abstract: Additional co-authors: Jose Maria Fernandez-Palacios, Rosalina Gabriel, Roy E. Gereau, Rosemary G. Gillespie, Josef Greimler, David E.V. Harter, Tsurng-Juhn Huang, Severin D.H. Irl , Daniel Jeanmonod, Anke Jentsch, Christoph Kueffer, Sandra Nogue, Rudiger Otto, Jonathan Price, Maria M. Romeiras, Dominique Strasberg, Tod Stuessy, Jens-Christian Svenning, Ole R. Vetaas, Carl Beierkuhnlein

212 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The FTIR-ATR showed to be a good methodology to quantify the main sugar content in honey and easily adapted to routine analysis.

211 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the mediational role of threat perception in the relationship between prejudice and discrimination was analyzed, and it was shown that realistic threat more strongly mediated the relationship than symbolic threat perception.
Abstract: This research analyses the mediational role of threat perception in the relationship between prejudice and discrimination (opposition to immigration and opposition to naturalization ofimmigrants). In the first study, using representative samples in 21 European countries (N ¼36566) from European Social Survey (2002), we showed that the relationship between prejudice and opposition to immigration was more strongly mediated by realistic than by symbolic threat perceptions. In Study 2, using representative samples in two countries with different traditions of immigration (Switzerland, N ¼940; Portugal, N ¼1514), we showed that realistic threat more strongly mediated the relationship between prejudice and opposition to immigration, while only symbolic threat perception mediated the link between prejudice and opposition to naturalization. The theoretical implications of considering threat perceptions as factors that legitimize discrimination are discussed. Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

211 citations


Authors

Showing all 19716 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Joao Seixas1531538115070
A. Gomes1501862113951
Marco Costa1461458105096
António Amorim136147796519
Osamu Jinnouchi13588586104
P. Verdier133111183862
Andy Haas132109687742
Wendy Taylor131125289457
Steve McMahon13087878763
Timothy Andeen129106977593
Heather Gray12996680970
Filipe Veloso12888775496
Nuno Filipe Castro12896076945
Oliver Stelzer-Chilton128114179154
Isabel Marian Trigger12897477594
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
VU University Amsterdam
75.6K papers, 3.4M citations

91% related

University of Padua
114.8K papers, 3.6M citations

91% related

University of Bologna
115.1K papers, 3.4M citations

91% related

University of Groningen
69.1K papers, 2.9M citations

91% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023247
2022828
20214,521
20204,517
20193,810
20183,617