scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Lisbon

EducationLisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
About: University of Lisbon is a education organization based out in Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & European union. The organization has 19122 authors who have published 48503 publications receiving 1102623 citations. The organization is also known as: Universidade de Lisboa & Lisbon University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the Dirichlet problem for a class of nonlinear parabolic equations with nonstandard anisotropic growth conditions was studied and theorems of existence and uniqueness of weak solutions in suitable Orlicz-Sobolev spaces were proved.
Abstract: We study the Dirichlet problem for a class of nonlinear parabolic equations with nonstandard anisotropic growth conditions. Equations of this class generalize the evolutional p(x, t)-Laplacian. We prove theorems of existence and uniqueness of weak solutions in suitable Orlicz-Sobolev spaces, derive global and local in time L∞ bounds for the weak solutions.

186 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A2A-induced “desensitization” of A1receptors was prevented by the protein kinase C inhibitor, chelerythrine (6 μM), and was not detected in the presence of theprotein kinase...
Abstract: Adenosine modulates synaptic transmission by acting on inhibitory A1 and facilitatory A2A receptors, the densities of which are modified in aged animals. We investigated how A2A receptor activation...

186 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Georges Aad1, Brad Abbott2, Jalal Abdallah3, Ovsat Abdinov4  +2814 moreInstitutions (212)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe a model-agnostic search for pairs of jets (dijets) produced by resonant and non-resonant phenomena beyond the Standard Model.

185 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the potential and challenges of the Anthropocene concept to encourage integrative understandings of global change and sustainability, and argue that without truly collaborative and integrative research, many of the critical exchanges around the concept are likely to perpetuate fragmented research agendas and to reinforce disciplinary boundaries.
Abstract: Since it was first proposed in 2000, the concept of the Anthropocene has evolved in breadth and diversely. The concept encapsulates the new and unprecedented planetary-scale changes resulting from societal transformations and has brought to the fore the social drivers of global change. The concept has revealed tensions between generalized interpretations of humanity’s contribution to global change, and interpretations that are historically, politically and culturally situated. It motivates deep ethical questions about the politics and economics of global change, including diverse interpretations of past causes and future possibilities. As such, more than other concepts, the Anthropocene concept has brought front-and-center epistemological divides between and within the natural and social sciences, and the humanities. It has also brought new opportunities for collaboration. Here we explore the potential and challenges of the concept to encourage integrative understandings of global change and sustainability. Based on bibliometric analysis and literature review, we discuss the now wide acceptance of the term, its interpretive flexibility, the emerging narratives as well as the debates the concept has inspired. We argue that without truly collaborative and integrative research, many of the critical exchanges around the concept are likely to perpetuate fragmented research agendas and to reinforce disciplinary boundaries. This means appreciating the strengths and limitations of different knowledge domains, approaches and perspectives, with the concept of the Anthropocene serving as a bridge, which we encourage researchers and others to cross. This calls for institutional arrangements that facilitate collaborative research, training, and action, yet also depends on more robust and sustained funding for such activities. To illustrate, we briefly discuss three overarching global change problems where novel types of collaborative research could make a difference: (1) Emergent properties of socioecological systems; (2) Urbanization and resource nexus; and (3) Systemic risks and tipping points. Creative tensions around the Anthropocene concept can help the research community to move toward new conceptual syntheses and integrative action-oriented approaches that are needed to producing useful knowledge commensurable with the challenges of global change and sustainability.

185 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the integration of mediated modelling (MM) techniques with multi-criteria assessment (MCA) in a participatory decision-making context is discussed and a case study developed in a protected coastal wetland (Ria Formosa, Portugal).

185 citations


Authors

Showing all 19716 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Joao Seixas1531538115070
A. Gomes1501862113951
Marco Costa1461458105096
António Amorim136147796519
Osamu Jinnouchi13588586104
P. Verdier133111183862
Andy Haas132109687742
Wendy Taylor131125289457
Steve McMahon13087878763
Timothy Andeen129106977593
Heather Gray12996680970
Filipe Veloso12888775496
Nuno Filipe Castro12896076945
Oliver Stelzer-Chilton128114179154
Isabel Marian Trigger12897477594
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
VU University Amsterdam
75.6K papers, 3.4M citations

91% related

University of Padua
114.8K papers, 3.6M citations

91% related

University of Bologna
115.1K papers, 3.4M citations

91% related

University of Groningen
69.1K papers, 2.9M citations

91% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023247
2022827
20214,520
20204,517
20193,810
20183,617