scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Lisbon

EducationLisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
About: University of Lisbon is a education organization based out in Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & European union. The organization has 19122 authors who have published 48503 publications receiving 1102623 citations. The organization is also known as: Universidade de Lisboa & Lisbon University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a nomenclature for restriction endonucleases, DNA methyltransferases, homing endon nucleases and related genes and gene products is described.
Abstract: A nomenclature is described for restriction endonucleases, DNA methyltransferases, homing endonucleases and related genes and gene products. It provides explicit categories for the many different Type II enzymes now identified and provides a system for naming the putative genes found by sequence analysis of microbial genomes.

710 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The ERA5-Land dataset as mentioned in this paper is an enhanced global dataset for the land component of the fifth generation of European ReAnalysis (ERA5), hereafter referred to as ERA5Land.
Abstract: . Framed within the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) of the European Commission, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) is producing an enhanced global dataset for the land component of the fifth generation of European ReAnalysis (ERA5), hereafter referred to as ERA5-Land. Once completed, the period covered will span from 1950 to the present, with continuous updates to support land monitoring applications. ERA5-Land describes the evolution of the water and energy cycles over land in a consistent manner over the production period, which, among others, could be used to analyse trends and anomalies. This is achieved through global high-resolution numerical integrations of the ECMWF land surface model driven by the downscaled meteorological forcing from the ERA5 climate reanalysis, including an elevation correction for the thermodynamic near-surface state. ERA5-Land shares with ERA5 most of the parameterizations that guarantees the use of the state-of-the-art land surface modelling applied to numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. A main advantage of ERA5-Land compared to ERA5 and the older ERA-Interim is the horizontal resolution, which is enhanced globally to 9 km compared to 31 km (ERA5) or 80 km (ERA-Interim), whereas the temporal resolution is hourly as in ERA5. Evaluation against independent in situ observations and global model or satellite-based reference datasets shows the added value of ERA5-Land in the description of the hydrological cycle, in particular with enhanced soil moisture and lake description, and an overall better agreement of river discharge estimations with available observations. However, ERA5-Land snow depth fields present a mixed performance when compared to those of ERA5, depending on geographical location and altitude. The description of the energy cycle shows comparable results with ERA5. Nevertheless, ERA5-Land reduces the global averaged root mean square error of the skin temperature, taking as reference MODIS data, mainly due to the contribution of coastal points where spatial resolution is important. Since January 2020, the ERA5-Land period available has extended from January 1981 to the near present, with a 2- to 3-month delay with respect to real time. The segment prior to 1981 is in production, aiming for a release of the whole dataset in summer/autumn 2021. The high spatial and temporal resolution of ERA5-Land, its extended period, and the consistency of the fields produced makes it a valuable dataset to support hydrological studies, to initialize NWP and climate models, and to support diverse applications dealing with water resource, land, and environmental management. The full ERA5-Land hourly ( Munoz-Sabater , 2019 a ) and monthly ( Munoz-Sabater , 2019 b ) averaged datasets presented in this paper are available through the C3S Climate Data Store at https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.e2161bac and https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.68d2bb30 , respectively.

704 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Structured interviews are provided and recommend their use in future controlled studies, in particular when trying to extend the parameters applied, to discuss recent regulatory issues, reporting practices and ethical issues.

699 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Roberto Abuter1, António Amorim2, Narsireddy Anugu3, M. Bauböck4, Myriam Benisty5, Jean-Philippe Berger1, Jean-Philippe Berger5, Nicolas Blind6, H. Bonnet1, Wolfgang Brandner4, A. Buron4, C. Collin7, F. Chapron7, Yann Clénet7, V. dCoudé u Foresto7, P. T. de Zeeuw8, P. T. de Zeeuw4, Casey Deen4, F. Delplancke-Ströbele1, Roderick Dembet7, Roderick Dembet1, Jason Dexter4, Gilles Duvert5, Andreas Eckart9, Andreas Eckart4, Frank Eisenhauer4, Gert Finger1, N. M. Förster Schreiber4, P. Fédou7, Paulo J. V. Garcia2, Paulo J. V. Garcia3, R. Garcia Lopez10, R. Garcia Lopez4, Feng Gao4, Eric Gendron7, Reinhard Genzel4, Reinhard Genzel11, Stefan Gillessen4, Paulo Gordo2, Maryam Habibi4, Xavier Haubois1, M. Haug1, F. Haußmann4, Th. Henning4, Stefan Hippler4, Matthew Horrobin9, Z. Hubert4, Z. Hubert7, Norbert Hubin1, A. Jimenez Rosales4, Lieselotte Jochum1, Laurent Jocou5, Andreas Kaufer1, S. Kellner4, Sarah Kendrew12, Sarah Kendrew4, Pierre Kervella7, Yitping Kok4, Martin Kulas4, Sylvestre Lacour7, V. Lapeyrère7, Bernard Lazareff5, J.-B. Le Bouquin5, Pierre Léna7, Magdalena Lippa4, Rainer Lenzen4, Antoine Mérand1, E. Müler1, E. Müler4, Udo Neumann4, Thomas Ott4, L. Palanca1, Thibaut Paumard7, Luca Pasquini1, Karine Perraut5, Guy Perrin7, Oliver Pfuhl4, P. M. Plewa4, Sebastian Rabien4, A. Ramirez1, Joany Andreina Manjarres Ramos4, C. Rau4, G. Rodríguez-Coira7, R.-R. Rohloff4, Gérard Rousset7, J. Sanchez-Bermudez1, J. Sanchez-Bermudez4, Silvia Scheithauer4, Markus Schöller1, N. Schuler1, Jason Spyromilio1, Odele Straub7, Christian Straubmeier9, Eckhard Sturm4, Linda J. Tacconi4, Konrad R. W. Tristram1, Frederic H. Vincent7, S. von Fellenberg4, Imke Wank9, Idel Waisberg4, Felix Widmann4, Ekkehard Wieprecht4, M. Wiest9, Erich Wiezorrek4, Julien Woillez1, S. Yazici9, S. Yazici4, D. Ziegler7, Gérard Zins1 
TL;DR: Eisenhauer et al. as mentioned in this paper detect the combined gravitational redshift and relativistic transverse Doppler effect for S2 of z = Δλ / λ ≈ 200 km s−1/c with different statistical analysis methods.
Abstract: The highly elliptical, 16-year-period orbit of the star S2 around the massive black hole candidate Sgr A✻ is a sensitive probe of the gravitational field in the Galactic centre. Near pericentre at 120 AU ≈ 1400 Schwarzschild radii, the star has an orbital speed of ≈7650 km s−1, such that the first-order effects of Special and General Relativity have now become detectable with current capabilities. Over the past 26 years, we have monitored the radial velocity and motion on the sky of S2, mainly with the SINFONI and NACO adaptive optics instruments on the ESO Very Large Telescope, and since 2016 and leading up to the pericentre approach in May 2018, with the four-telescope interferometric beam-combiner instrument GRAVITY. From data up to and including pericentre, we robustly detect the combined gravitational redshift and relativistic transverse Doppler effect for S2 of z = Δλ / λ ≈ 200 km s−1/c with different statistical analysis methods. When parameterising the post-Newtonian contribution from these effects by a factor f , with f = 0 and f = 1 corresponding to the Newtonian and general relativistic limits, respectively, we find from posterior fitting with different weighting schemes f = 0.90 ± 0.09|stat ± 0.15|sys. The S2 data are inconsistent with pure Newtonian dynamics.Key words: Galaxy: center / gravitation / black hole physics⋆ This paper is dedicated to Tal Alexander, who passed away about a week before the pericentre approach of S2.⋆⋆ GRAVITY is developed in a collaboration by the Max Planck Institute for extraterrestrial Physics, LESIA of Paris Observatory/CNRS/Sorbonne Universite/Univ. Paris Diderot and IPAG of Universite Grenoble Alpes/CNRS, the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, the University of Cologne, the CENTRA – Centro de Astrofisica e Gravitacao, and the European Southern Observatory.⋆⋆⋆ Corresponding author: F. Eisenhauer e-mail: eisenhau@mpe.mpg.de

693 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Sado Estuary in Portugal is a good example of a site where human pressures and ecological values collide with each other as mentioned in this paper, and an overall contamination assessment has never been conducted in a way that is comprehensible to estuary managers.

691 citations


Authors

Showing all 19716 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Joao Seixas1531538115070
A. Gomes1501862113951
Marco Costa1461458105096
António Amorim136147796519
Osamu Jinnouchi13588586104
P. Verdier133111183862
Andy Haas132109687742
Wendy Taylor131125289457
Steve McMahon13087878763
Timothy Andeen129106977593
Heather Gray12996680970
Filipe Veloso12888775496
Nuno Filipe Castro12896076945
Oliver Stelzer-Chilton128114179154
Isabel Marian Trigger12897477594
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
VU University Amsterdam
75.6K papers, 3.4M citations

91% related

University of Padua
114.8K papers, 3.6M citations

91% related

University of Bologna
115.1K papers, 3.4M citations

91% related

University of Groningen
69.1K papers, 2.9M citations

91% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023247
2022827
20214,520
20204,517
20193,810
20183,617