scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Lisbon

EducationLisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
About: University of Lisbon is a education organization based out in Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 19122 authors who have published 48503 publications receiving 1102623 citations. The organization is also known as: Universidade de Lisboa & Lisbon University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is a persistent interest in extending cosmology beyond the standard model, ΛCDM, motivated by a range of apparently serious theoretical issues, involving such questions as the cosmological constant problem, the particle nature of dark matter, the validity of general relativity on large scales, the existence of anomalies in the CMB and on small scales, and the predictivity and testability of the inflationary paradigm as mentioned in this paper.

378 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results reveal the immense potential for translating the dispersed expertise in biological assays involving human pathogens into drug discovery starting points, by providing open access to new families of molecules, and emphasize how a small additional investment made to help acquire and distribute compounds, and sharing the data, can catalyze drug discovery for dozens of different indications.
Abstract: A major cause of the paucity of new starting points for drug discovery is the lack of interaction between academia and industry. Much of the global resource in biology is present in universities, whereas the focus of medicinal chemistry is still largely within industry. Open source drug discovery, with sharing of information, is clearly a first step towards overcoming this gap. But the interface could especially be bridged through a scale-up of open sharing of physical compounds, which would accelerate the finding of new starting points for drug discovery. The Medicines for Malaria Venture Malaria Box is a collection of over 400 compounds representing families of structures identified in phenotypic screens of pharmaceutical and academic libraries against the Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasite. The set has now been distributed to almost 200 research groups globally in the last two years, with the only stipulation that information from the screens is deposited in the public domain. This paper reports for the first time on 236 screens that have been carried out against the Malaria Box and compares these results with 55 assays that were previously published, in a format that allows a meta-analysis of the combined dataset. The combined biochemical and cellular assays presented here suggest mechanisms of action for 135 (34%) of the compounds active in killing multiple life-cycle stages of the malaria parasite, including asexual blood, liver, gametocyte, gametes and insect ookinete stages. In addition, many compounds demonstrated activity against other pathogens, showing hits in assays with 16 protozoa, 7 helminths, 9 bacterial and mycobacterial species, the dengue fever mosquito vector, and the NCI60 human cancer cell line panel of 60 human tumor cell lines. Toxicological, pharmacokinetic and metabolic properties were collected on all the compounds, assisting in the selection of the most promising candidates for murine proof-of-concept experiments and medicinal chemistry programs. The data for all of these assays are presented and analyzed to show how outstanding leads for many indications can be selected. These results reveal the immense potential for translating the dispersed expertise in biological assays involving human pathogens into drug discovery starting points, by providing open access to new families of molecules, and emphasize how a small additional investment made to help acquire and distribute compounds, and sharing the data, can catalyze drug discovery for dozens of different indications. Another lesson is that when multiple screens from different groups are run on the same library, results can be integrated quickly to select the most valuable starting points for subsequent medicinal chemistry efforts.

377 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Lorenzo Galluzzi, Erika Vacchelli1, José Manuel Bravo-San Pedro1, Aitziber Buqué1, Laura Senovilla1, Elisa E. Baracco, Norma Bloy, Francesca Castoldi, Jean Pierre Abastado, Patrizia Agostinis2, Ron N. Apte3, Fernando Aranda, Maha Ayyoub1, Philipp Beckhove4, Jean-Yves Blay, Laura Bracci5, Anne Caignard1, Chiara Castelli, Federica Cavallo6, Estaban Celis7, Vincenzo Cerundolo8, Aled Clayton9, Mario P. Colombo, Lisa M. Coussens10, Madhav V. Dhodapkar11, Alexander M.M. Eggermont, Douglas T. Fearon12, Wolf H. Fridman, Jitka Fucikova, Dmitry I. Gabrilovich13, Jérôme Galon, Abhishek D. Garg2, François Ghiringhelli1, François Ghiringhelli14, Giuseppe Giaccone15, Giuseppe Giaccone16, Eli Gilboa17, Sacha Gnjatic18, Axel Hoos19, Anne Hosmalin1, Anne Hosmalin20, Anne Hosmalin21, Dirk Jäger22, Pawel Kalinski23, Klas Kärre24, Oliver Kepp1, Rolf Kiessling24, John M. Kirkwood23, Eva Klein24, Alexander Knuth25, Claire E. Lewis26, Roland S. Liblau21, Roland S. Liblau27, Roland S. Liblau1, Michael T. Lotze23, Enrico Lugli, Jean-Pierre Mach28, Fabrizio Mattei5, Domenico Mavilio29, Ignacio Melero30, Cornelis J. M. Melief31, E. A. Mittendorf32, Lorenzo Moretta33, Adekunke Odunsi34, Hideho Okada35, Anna Karolina Palucka, Marcus E. Peter36, Kenneth J. Pienta37, Angel Porgador3, George C. Prendergast38, George C. Prendergast39, Gabriel A. Rabinovich40, Nicholas P. Restifo16, Naiyer A. Rizvi41, Catherine Sautès-Fridman, Hans Schreiber42, Barbara Seliger43, Hiroshi Shiku44, Bruno Silva-Santos45, Mark J. Smyth46, Mark J. Smyth47, Daniel E. Speiser28, Daniel E. Speiser48, Radek Spisek, Pramod K. Srivastava49, James E. Talmadge50, Eric Tartour, Sjoerd H. van der Burg31, Benoît Van den Eynde51, Benoît Van den Eynde48, Richard G. Vile52, Hermann Wagner53, Jeffrey S. Weber54, Theresa L. Whiteside23, Jedd D. Wolchok41, Jedd D. Wolchok55, Laurence Zitvogel, Weiping Zou56, Guido Kroemer 
French Institute of Health and Medical Research1, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven2, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev3, German Cancer Research Center4, Istituto Superiore di Sanità5, University of Turin6, Georgia Regents University7, University of Oxford8, Cardiff University9, Oregon Health & Science University10, Yale University11, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory12, University of Pennsylvania13, University of Burgundy14, Georgetown University15, National Institutes of Health16, University of Miami17, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai18, GlaxoSmithKline19, University of Paris20, Centre national de la recherche scientifique21, Heidelberg University22, University of Pittsburgh23, Karolinska Institutet24, Hamad Medical Corporation25, University of Sheffield26, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse27, University of Lausanne28, University of Milan29, University of Navarra30, Leiden University31, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston32, Istituto Giannina Gaslini33, Roswell Park Cancer Institute34, University of California, San Francisco35, Northwestern University36, Johns Hopkins University37, Thomas Jefferson University38, Main Line Health39, University of Buenos Aires40, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center41, University of Chicago42, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg43, Mie University44, University of Lisbon45, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute46, University of Queensland47, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research48, University of Connecticut49, University of Nebraska Medical Center50, Université catholique de Louvain51, Mayo Clinic52, Technische Universität München53, University of South Florida54, Cornell University55, University of Michigan56
TL;DR: A critical, integrated classification of anticancer immunotherapies is proposed and the clinical relevance of these approaches is discussed.
Abstract: During the past decades, anticancer immunotherapy has evolved from a promising therapeutic option to a robust clinical reality. Many immunotherapeutic regimens are now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for use in cancer patients, and many others are being investigated as standalone therapeutic interventions or combined with conventional treatments in clinical studies. Immunotherapies may be subdivided into "passive" and "active" based on their ability to engage the host immune system against cancer. Since the anticancer activity of most passive immunotherapeutics (including tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies) also relies on the host immune system, this classification does not properly reflect the complexity of the drug-host-tumor interaction. Alternatively, anticancer immunotherapeutics can be classified according to their antigen specificity. While some immunotherapies specifically target one (or a few) defined tumor-associated antigen(s), others operate in a relatively non-specific manner and boost natural or therapy-elicited anticancer immune responses of unknown and often broad specificity. Here, we propose a critical, integrated classification of anticancer immunotherapies and discuss the clinical relevance of these approaches.

375 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper reviewed 276 published studies describing various effects of farmland abandonment on biodiversity and found that a study's geographic region, selected metrics, assessed taxa, and conservation focus significantly affected how those impacts were reported.
Abstract: Farmland abandonment is changing rural landscapes worldwide, but its impacts on biodiversity are still being debated in the scientific literature. While some researchers see it as a threat to biodiversity, others view it as an opportunity for habitat regeneration. We reviewed 276 published studies describing various effects of farmland abandonment on biodiversity and found that a study's geographic region, selected metrics, assessed taxa, and conservation focus significantly affected how those impacts were reported. Countries in Eurasia and the New World reported mainly negative and positive effects of farmland abandonment on biodiversity, respectively. Notably, contrasting impacts were recorded in different agricultural regions of the world that were otherwise similar in land-use and biodiversity characteristics. We showed that the conservation focus (pre- or post-abandonment) in different regions is an important factor influencing how scientists address the abandonment issue, and this may affect how lan...

375 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Richard J. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, Sheelu Abraham3, Fausto Acernese4  +1692 moreInstitutions (195)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reported the observation of gravitational waves from two compact binary coalescences in LIGO's and Virgo's third observing run with properties consistent with neutron star-black hole (NSBH) binaries.
Abstract: We report the observation of gravitational waves from two compact binary coalescences in LIGO’s and Virgo’s third observing run with properties consistent with neutron star–black hole (NSBH) binaries. The two events are named GW200105_162426 and GW200115_042309, abbreviated as GW200105 and GW200115; the first was observed by LIGO Livingston and Virgo and the second by all three LIGO–Virgo detectors. The source of GW200105 has component masses 8.9−1.5+1.2 and 1.9−0.2+0.3M⊙ , whereas the source of GW200115 has component masses 5.7−2.1+1.8 and 1.5−0.3+0.7M⊙ (all measurements quoted at the 90% credible level). The probability that the secondary’s mass is below the maximal mass of a neutron star is 89%–96% and 87%–98%, respectively, for GW200105 and GW200115, with the ranges arising from different astrophysical assumptions. The source luminosity distances are 280−110+110 and 300−100+150Mpc , respectively. The magnitude of the primary spin of GW200105 is less than 0.23 at the 90% credible level, and its orientation is unconstrained. For GW200115, the primary spin has a negative spin projection onto the orbital angular momentum at 88% probability. We are unable to constrain the spin or tidal deformation of the secondary component for either event. We infer an NSBH merger rate density of 45−33+75Gpc−3yr−1 when assuming that GW200105 and GW200115 are representative of the NSBH population or 130−69+112Gpc−3yr−1 under the assumption of a broader distribution of component masses.

374 citations


Authors

Showing all 19716 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Joao Seixas1531538115070
A. Gomes1501862113951
Marco Costa1461458105096
António Amorim136147796519
Osamu Jinnouchi13588586104
P. Verdier133111183862
Andy Haas132109687742
Wendy Taylor131125289457
Steve McMahon13087878763
Timothy Andeen129106977593
Heather Gray12996680970
Filipe Veloso12888775496
Nuno Filipe Castro12896076945
Oliver Stelzer-Chilton128114179154
Isabel Marian Trigger12897477594
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
VU University Amsterdam
75.6K papers, 3.4M citations

91% related

University of Padua
114.8K papers, 3.6M citations

91% related

University of Bologna
115.1K papers, 3.4M citations

91% related

University of Groningen
69.1K papers, 2.9M citations

91% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023247
2022828
20214,521
20204,517
20193,810
20183,617