scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Lisbon

EducationLisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
About: University of Lisbon is a education organization based out in Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 19122 authors who have published 48503 publications receiving 1102623 citations. The organization is also known as: Universidade de Lisboa & Lisbon University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper introduces two-step 1ST (TwIST) algorithms, exhibiting much faster convergence rate than 1ST for ill-conditioned problems, and introduces a monotonic version of TwIST (MTwIST); although the convergence proof does not apply, the effectiveness of the new methods are experimentally confirmed on problems of image deconvolution and of restoration with missing samples.
Abstract: Iterative shrinkage/thresholding (1ST) algorithms have been recently proposed to handle a class of convex unconstrained optimization problems arising in image restoration and other linear inverse problems. This class of problems results from combining a linear observation model with a nonquadratic regularizer (e.g., total variation or wavelet-based regularization). It happens that the convergence rate of these 1ST algorithms depends heavily on the linear observation operator, becoming very slow when this operator is ill-conditioned or ill-posed. In this paper, we introduce two-step 1ST (TwIST) algorithms, exhibiting much faster convergence rate than 1ST for ill-conditioned problems. For a vast class of nonquadratic convex regularizers (lscrP norms, some Besov norms, and total variation), we show that TwIST converges to a minimizer of the objective function, for a given range of values of its parameters. For noninvertible observation operators, we introduce a monotonic version of TwIST (MTwIST); although the convergence proof does not apply to this scenario, we give experimental evidence that MTwIST exhibits similar speed gains over IST. The effectiveness of the new methods are experimentally confirmed on problems of image deconvolution and of restoration with missing samples.

1,870 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Differences among species that can be traced to different capacities for water acquisition, rather than to differences in metabolism at a given water status, are described.

1,838 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors considered a modified theory of gravity, where the gravitational Lagrangian is given by an arbitrary function of the Ricci scalar and of the trace of the stress-energy tensor.
Abstract: We consider $f(R,T)$ modified theories of gravity, where the gravitational Lagrangian is given by an arbitrary function of the Ricci scalar $R$ and of the trace of the stress-energy tensor $T$. We obtain the gravitational field equations in the metric formalism, as well as the equations of motion for test particles, which follow from the covariant divergence of the stress-energy tensor. Generally, the gravitational field equations depend on the nature of the matter source. The field equations of several particular models, corresponding to some explicit forms of the function $f(R,T)$, are also presented. An important case, which is analyzed in detail, is represented by scalar field models. We write down the action and briefly consider the cosmological implications of the $f(R,{T}^{\ensuremath{\phi}})$ models, where ${T}^{\ensuremath{\phi}}$ is the trace of the stress-energy tensor of a self-interacting scalar field. The equations of motion of the test particles are also obtained from a variational principle. The motion of massive test particles is nongeodesic, and takes place in the presence of an extra-force orthogonal to the four velocity. The Newtonian limit of the equation of motion is further analyzed. Finally, we provide a constraint on the magnitude of the extra acceleration by analyzing the perihelion precession of the planet Mercury in the framework of the present model.

1,833 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: An overview of unmixing methods from the time of Keshava and Mustard's tutorial as mentioned in this paper to the present can be found in Section 2.2.1].
Abstract: Imaging spectrometers measure electromagnetic energy scattered in their instantaneous field view in hundreds or thousands of spectral channels with higher spectral resolution than multispectral cameras. Imaging spectrometers are therefore often referred to as hyperspectral cameras (HSCs). Higher spectral resolution enables material identification via spectroscopic analysis, which facilitates countless applications that require identifying materials in scenarios unsuitable for classical spectroscopic analysis. Due to low spatial resolution of HSCs, microscopic material mixing, and multiple scattering, spectra measured by HSCs are mixtures of spectra of materials in a scene. Thus, accurate estimation requires unmixing. Pixels are assumed to be mixtures of a few materials, called endmembers. Unmixing involves estimating all or some of: the number of endmembers, their spectral signatures, and their abundances at each pixel. Unmixing is a challenging, ill-posed inverse problem because of model inaccuracies, observation noise, environmental conditions, endmember variability, and data set size. Researchers have devised and investigated many models searching for robust, stable, tractable, and accurate unmixing algorithms. This paper presents an overview of unmixing methods from the time of Keshava and Mustard's unmixing tutorial [1] to the present. Mixing models are first discussed. Signal-subspace, geometrical, statistical, sparsity-based, and spatial-contextual unmixing algorithms are described. Mathematical problems and potential solutions are described. Algorithm characteristics are illustrated experimentally.

1,808 citations


Authors

Showing all 19716 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Joao Seixas1531538115070
A. Gomes1501862113951
Marco Costa1461458105096
António Amorim136147796519
Osamu Jinnouchi13588586104
P. Verdier133111183862
Andy Haas132109687742
Wendy Taylor131125289457
Steve McMahon13087878763
Timothy Andeen129106977593
Heather Gray12996680970
Filipe Veloso12888775496
Nuno Filipe Castro12896076945
Oliver Stelzer-Chilton128114179154
Isabel Marian Trigger12897477594
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
VU University Amsterdam
75.6K papers, 3.4M citations

91% related

University of Padua
114.8K papers, 3.6M citations

91% related

University of Bologna
115.1K papers, 3.4M citations

91% related

University of Groningen
69.1K papers, 2.9M citations

91% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023247
2022828
20214,521
20204,517
20193,810
20183,617