Institution
University of Ljubljana
Education•Ljubljana, Slovenia•
About: University of Ljubljana is a education organization based out in Ljubljana, Slovenia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Liquid crystal. The organization has 17210 authors who have published 47013 publications receiving 1082684 citations. The organization is also known as: Univerza v Ljubljani.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The knotting of microscopic topological defect lines in chiral nematic liquid-crystal colloids are demonstrated by using laser tweezers as a micromanipulation tool, demonstrating how relevant the topology can be for the material engineering of soft matter.
Abstract: Tying knots and linking microscopic loops of polymers, macromolecules, or defect lines in complex materials is a challenging task for material scientists We demonstrate the knotting of microscopic topological defect lines in chiral nematic liquid-crystal colloids into knots and links of arbitrary complexity by using laser tweezers as a micromanipulation tool All knots and links with up to six crossings, including the Hopf link, the Star of David, and the Borromean rings, are demonstrated, stabilizing colloidal particles into an unusual soft matter The knots in chiral nematic colloids are classified by the quantized self-linking number, a direct measure of the geometric, or Berry’s, phase Forming arbitrary microscopic knots and links in chiral nematic colloids is a demonstration of how relevant the topology can be for the material engineering of soft matter
367 citations
••
ETH Zurich1, University of Ulm2, Royal Museum for Central Africa3, Vrije Universiteit Brussel4, University of Coimbra5, University of Helsinki6, University of Victoria7, University of Innsbruck8, University of Milan9, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague10, Spanish National Research Council11, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research12, Institut national de la recherche agronomique13, Laval University14, University of Ljubljana15, United States Geological Survey16, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev17, Center for International Forestry Research18, Technical University of Berlin19, Dresden University of Technology20, University of Kansas21, University of Arkansas22, Max Planck Society23, National Museum of Natural History24, Desert Botanical Garden25, Humboldt State University26, Sukachev Institute of Forest27, National Scientific and Technical Research Council28, National University of Comahue29, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center30, Wageningen University and Research Centre31, Naturalis32, Pablo de Olavide University33, Autonomous University of Barcelona34, University of Lisbon35, Mediterranean University36, Technical University of Madrid37, University of Western Sydney38, University of Debrecen39, Natural Resources Canada40, American Hotel & Lodging Educational Institute41, Open University of Cyprus42, University of Patras43, University of Cyprus44, University of Colorado Boulder45, Northern Arizona University46, University of Novi Sad47, European Forest Institute48, Estonian University of Life Sciences49, University of Alberta50, University of Minnesota51, University of Forestry, Sofia52
TL;DR: The results imply that growth-based mortality algorithms may be a powerful tool for predicting gymnosperm mortality induced by chronic stress, but not necessarily so for angiosperms and in case of intense drought or bark-beetle outbreaks.
Abstract: Tree mortality is a key factor influencing forest functions and dynamics, but our understanding of the mechanisms
leading to mortality and the associated changes in tree growth rates are still limited. We compiled a new pan-conti-
nental tree-ring width database from sites where both dead and living trees were sampled (2970 dead and 4224 living
trees from 190 sites, including 36 species), and compared early and recent growth rates between trees that died and
those that survived a given mortality event. We observed a decrease in radial growth before death in ca. 84% of the
mortality events. The extent and duration of these reductions were highly variable (1–100 years in 96% of events) due
to the complex interactions among study species and the source(s) of mortality. Strong and long-lasting declines were
found for gymnosperms, shade- and drought-tolerant species, and trees that died from competition. Angiosperms
and trees that died due to biotic attacks (especially bark-beetles) typically showed relatively small and short-term
growth reductions. Our analysis did not highlight any universal trade-off between early growth and tree longevity
within a species, although this result may also reflect high variability in sampling design among sites. The intersite
and interspecific variability in growth patterns before mortality provides valuable information on the nature of the
mortality process, which is consistent with our understanding of the physiological mechanisms leading to mortality.
Abrupt changes in growth immediately before death can be associated with generalized hydraulic failure and/or
bark-beetle attack, while long-term decrease in growth may be associated with a gradual decline in hydraulic performance coupled with depletion in carbon reserves. Our results imply that growth-based mortality algorithms may be
a powerful tool for predicting gymnosperm mortality induced by chronic stress, but not necessarily so for angiosperms and in case of intense drought or bark-beetle outbreaks.
367 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame has been studied using the N2 method, which is based on pushover analysis and the inelastic spectrum approach.
367 citations
••
TL;DR: It is proposed that transcribed target SNPs alter miRNA gene regulation and, consequently, protein expression, contributing to the likelihood of cancer susceptibility, by a novel mechanism of subtle gene regulation.
Abstract: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) associated with polygenetic disorders, such as breast cancer (BC), can create, destroy, or modify microRNA (miRNA) binding sites; however, the extent to which SNPs interfere with miRNA gene regulation and affect cancer susceptibility remains largely unknown. We hypothesize that disruption of miRNA target binding by SNPs is a widespread mechanism relevant to cancer susceptibility. To test this, we analyzed SNPs known to be associated with BC risk, in silico and in vitro, for their ability to modify miRNA binding sites and miRNA gene regulation and referred to these as target SNPs. We identified rs1982073-TGFB1 and rs1799782-XRCC1 as target SNPs, whose alleles could modulate gene expression by differential interaction with miR-187 and miR-138, respectively. Genome-wide bioinformatics analysis predicted ∼64% of transcribed SNPs as target SNPs that can modify (increase/decrease) the binding energy of putative miRNA::mRNA duplexes by >90%. To assess whether target SNPs are implicated in BC susceptibility, we conducted a case-control population study and observed that germline occurrence of rs799917-BRCA1 and rs334348-TGFR1 significantly varies among populations with different risks of developing BC. Luciferase activity of target SNPs, allelic variants, and protein levels in cancer cell lines with different genotypes showed differential regulation of target genes following overexpression of the two interacting miRNAs (miR-638 and miR-628-5p). Therefore, we propose that transcribed target SNPs alter miRNA gene regulation and, consequently, protein expression, contributing to the likelihood of cancer susceptibility, by a novel mechanism of subtle gene regulation. Cancer Res; 70(7); 2789–98
365 citations
••
TL;DR: This paper presents a comparison study of the efforts towards in-situ applicability of EMMARM, as to provide real-time information about the response of individual cells to EMTs.
Abstract: 1 Laboratory of Biophysics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology-Molecular Cell Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 3 Departamento de Biologia e CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal 4 Celica Biomedical Center, Tehnoloski Park 24, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 5 Department of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Vecna pot 111, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
364 citations
Authors
Showing all 17388 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
David Miller | 203 | 2573 | 204840 |
Hyun-Chul Kim | 176 | 4076 | 183227 |
James M. Tour | 143 | 859 | 91364 |
Carmen García | 139 | 1503 | 96925 |
Bernt Schiele | 130 | 568 | 70032 |
Vladimir Cindro | 129 | 1157 | 82000 |
Teresa Barillari | 129 | 984 | 78782 |
Sven Menke | 129 | 1121 | 82034 |
Horst Oberlack | 129 | 985 | 80069 |
Hubert Kroha | 129 | 1126 | 80746 |
Peter Schacht | 129 | 1030 | 80092 |
Siegfried Bethke | 129 | 1266 | 103520 |
Igor Mandić | 128 | 1065 | 79498 |
Stefan Kluth | 128 | 1261 | 84534 |
Andrej Gorišek | 128 | 951 | 67830 |