University of Maine

About: University of Maine is a education organization based out in Orono, Maine, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Ice sheet. The organization has 8637 authors who have published 16932 publications receiving 590124 citations. The organization is also known as: University of Maine at Orono.

Lakes and reservoirs as sentinels, integrators, and regulators of climate change

Abstract: Climate change is generating complex responses in both natural and human ecosystems that vary in their geographic distribution, magnitude, and timing across the global landscape. One of the major issues that scientists and policy makers now confront is how to assess such massive changes over multiple scales of space and time. Lakes and reservoirs comprise a geographically distributed network of the lowest points in the surrounding landscape that make them important sentinels of climate change. Their physical, chemical, and biological responses to climate provide a variety of information-rich signals. Their sediments archive and integrate these signals, enabling paleolimnologists to document changes over years to millennia. Lakes are also hot spots of carbon cycling in the landscape and as such are important regulators of climate change, processing terrestrial and atmospheric as well as aquatic carbon. We provide an overview of this concept of lakes and reservoirs as sentinels, integrators, and regulators of climate change, as well as of the need for scaling and modeling these responses in the context of global climate change. We conclude by providing a brief look to the future and the creation of globally networked sensors in lakes and reservoirs around the world.

Feeding capabilities and limitation of herbivorous molluscs: A functional group approach

Abstract: The susceptibility of an alga to an herbivorous mollusc depends, in part, upon the size and toughness of the plant relative to the feeding ability of the mollusc. In this study, algae are subdivided into seven functional groups based on these and other physiological characteristics. Herbivorous prosobranchs and chitons are subdivided into four functional groups based on the structure of their feeding apparatus. Distinct patterns in the diets of these molluscs are evident when feeding data, based on these functional groups, are examined. Most herbivorous mollusc species eat algal forms that are either minute (i.e., micro- and filamentous algae) or very large and expansive (kelp-like or crustose algae). Algae of intermediate size (erect forms 1- to 10-cm tall) are eaten to a lesser extent, possibly because they are too large to be rasped from the substratum and too small for most herbivores to occupy. Herbivorous archaeogastropods (excluding limpets) and mesogastropods tend to eat filamentous and microscopic algal forms predominantly, whereas limpets and chitons feed on large, leathery and crustose algae. These dietary differences reflect functional differences in the feeding apparatus of these herbivore groups. Radulae of herbivorous mesogastropods function like rakes and can ingest larger, tougher algae than can radulae of nonlimpet archaeogastropods. The latter function more like brooms by sweeping the substratum broadly, but exerting little force. Limpets and chitons have superior excavating abilities because their radulae have: robust buccal muscles surrounding them, a reduced number of points of contact on the substratum, and minerally hardened teeth. The feeding apparatus of chitons is most versatile since it possesses features found in all herbivorous gastropod functional groups, and thus, it can sweep and excavate simultaneously. This functional group approach suggests various hypotheses concerning algal community structure, plant/herbivore and herbivore/herbivore interactions, the relative importance of structural defenses in algae, and the evolution of specialized grazers. These hypotheses are examined using data from published accounts.

The causes of project failure

Abstract: A study was conducted of 97 projects identified as failures by the projects' managers or parent organizations. Using the project implementation profile, a set of managerially controllable factors is identified as associated with project failure. The factors differed according to three contingency variables: the precise way in which failure was defined; the type of project, and the stage of the project in its life cycle. Implications for project management and for future research on failed projects are discussed. The results demonstrated empirical justification for a multidimensional construct of project failure, encompassing both internal efficiency and external effectiveness aspects. The fact that the critical factors associated with failure depended on the way in which failure is defined suggests that it is necessary to know considerably more about how project managers define failure (and success) and, indeed how the parent organization makes judgments on the matter. >