Institution
University of Mannheim
Education•Mannheim, Germany•
About: University of Mannheim is a education organization based out in Mannheim, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Context (language use) & Politics. The organization has 4448 authors who have published 12918 publications receiving 446557 citations. The organization is also known as: Uni Mannheim & UMA.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
University of Milan1, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil2, Curie Institute3, Leiden University Medical Center4, Vienna General Hospital5, University College London6, Leiden University7, Institut Jules Bordet8, Netherlands Cancer Institute9, Turku University Hospital10, University of Oxford11, University of Mannheim12, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich13, Helsinki University Central Hospital14, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust15, Institute of Cancer Research16, University Medical Center Groningen17, Radboud University Nijmegen18, Institut Gustave Roussy19, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center20, University Hospital of Lausanne21, University of Bologna22, University of Turin23, Weston Park Hospital24, Aarhus University Hospital25, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven26, Erasmus University Rotterdam27, Oslo University Hospital28, University College Hospital29, Claude Bernard University Lyon 130
1,150 citations
Harvard University1, University of Ulsan2, Claude Bernard University Lyon 13, Leiden University Medical Center4, University of Mannheim5, Fox Chase Cancer Center6, Helsinki University Central Hospital7, University of Palermo8, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto9, Institut Gustave Roussy10, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven11, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai12, University of Duisburg-Essen13, Academy of Military Medical Sciences14, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals15
TL;DR: The results of this study show that oral regorafenib can provide a significant improvement in progression-free survival compared with placebo in patients with metastatic GIST after progression on standard treatments.
1,079 citations
TL;DR: In this article, two experimental studies reveal the existence of a strong, positive impact of customer satisfaction on willingness to pay, and they provide support for a nonlinear, functional structure based on disappointment theory (i.e., an inverse S-shaped form).
Abstract: Two experimental studies (a lab experiment and a study involving a real usage experience over time) reveal the existence of a strong, positive impact of customer satisfaction on willingness to pay, and they provide support for a nonlinear, functional structure based on disappointment theory (i.e., an inverse S-shaped form). In addition, the second study examines dynamic aspects of the relationship and provides evidence for the stronger impact of cumulative satisfaction rather than of transaction-specific satisfaction on willingness to pay.
1,044 citations
TL;DR: A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the true correlation between attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance and to identify moderators of this correlation as mentioned in this paper, finding that the correlation was at least marginally significantly stronger for extra role performance as opposed to in-role performance.
Abstract: A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the true correlation between attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance and to identify moderators of this correlation. One-hundred and eleven samples from 93 published studies were included. The corrected mean correlation was 0.20. The correlation was at least marginally significantly stronger for: (a) extra-role performance as opposed to in-role performance; (b) white-collar workers as opposed to blue-collar workers; and (c) performance assessed by self ratings as opposed to supervisor ratings or objective indicators. Four other assumed moderators (commitment measure: Affective Commitment Scale versus Organizational Commitment Questionnaire, job level, age, and tenure) did not have at least marginally significant effects. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
1,014 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a simulation study compared maximum likelihood (ML) estimation with weighted least squares means and variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimation and found that with 2 and 3 categories the rejection rates corresponded much more to the expected rejection rates according to an alpha level of.
Abstract: This simulation study compared maximum likelihood (ML) estimation with weighted least squares means and variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimation. The study was based on confirmatory factor analyses with 1, 2, 4, and 8 factors, based on 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 cases, and on 5, 10, 20, and 40 variables with 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 categories. There was no model misspecification. The most important results were that with 2 and 3 categories the rejection rates of the WLSMV chi-square test corresponded much more to the expected rejection rates according to an alpha level of. 05 than the rejection rates of the ML chi-square test. The magnitude of the loadings was more precisely estimated by means of WLSMV when the variables had only 2 or 3 categories. The sample size for WLSMV estimation needed not to be larger than the sample size for ML estimation.
996 citations
Authors
Showing all 4522 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Kugel | 128 | 910 | 75529 |
| Jürgen Rehm | 126 | 1132 | 116037 |
| Norbert Schwarz | 117 | 488 | 71008 |
| Andreas Hochhaus | 117 | 923 | 68685 |
| Barry Eichengreen | 116 | 949 | 51073 |
| Herta Flor | 112 | 638 | 48175 |
| Eberhard Ritz | 111 | 1109 | 61530 |
| Marcella Rietschel | 110 | 765 | 65547 |
| Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg | 107 | 534 | 44592 |
| Daniel Cremers | 99 | 655 | 44957 |
| Thomas Brox | 99 | 329 | 94431 |
| Miles Hewstone | 88 | 418 | 26350 |
| Tobias Banaschewski | 85 | 692 | 31686 |
| Andreas Herrmann | 82 | 761 | 25274 |
| Axel Dreher | 78 | 350 | 20081 |