scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Massachusetts Boston

EducationBoston, Massachusetts, United States
About: University of Massachusetts Boston is a education organization based out in Boston, Massachusetts, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 6541 authors who have published 12918 publications receiving 411731 citations. The organization is also known as: UMass Boston.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
14 Dec 2018
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss a five-nodes definition of a nexus and propose perspectives that may lead to a reload of climate policy with buy-in from supply-chain managers and resource-rich developing countries.
Abstract: Debate around increasing demand for natural resources is often framed in terms of a ‘nexus’, which is perhaps at risk of becoming a buzz word. A nexus between what? Over what scales? And what are the consequences of such a nexus? This article analyses why readers should care about the nexus concept in relation to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We discuss a five-nodes definition and propose perspectives that may lead to a reload of climate policy with buy-in from supply-chain managers and resource-rich developing countries. Our research perspectives address modelling approaches and scenarios at the interface of bio-physical inputs and the human dimensions of security and governance.

193 citations

Book
01 Jan 1998
TL;DR: The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which barred practically all Chinese from American shores for ten years, was the first federal law that banned a group of immigrants solely on the basis of race or nationality as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which barred practically all Chinese from American shores for ten years, was the first federal law that banned a group of immigrants solely on the basis of race or nationality. By changing America's traditional policy of open immigration, this landmark legislation set a precedent for future restrictions against Asian immigrants in the early 1900s and against Europeans in the 1920s. Tracing the origins of the Chinese Exclusion Act, Andrew Gyory presents a bold new interpretation of American politics during Reconstruction and the Gilded Age. Rather than directly confront such divisive problems as class conflict, economic depression, and rising unemployment, he contends, politicians sought a safe, nonideological solution to the nation's industrial crisis--and latched onto Chinese exclusion. Ignoring workers' demands for an end simply to imported contract labor, they claimed instead that working people would be better off if there were no Chinese immigrants. By playing the race card, Gyory argues, national politicians--not California, not organized labor, and not a general racist atmosphere--provided the motive force behind the era's most racist legislation. |Analyzes the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 from a national perspective. By playing the race card, national politicians--not California, not organized labor, and not a general racist atmosphere--were responsible for this law.

193 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, an analysis of OLI's absolute radiometric performance over bodies of water using benchmark observations, namely the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) ocean color observations and marine in situ radiometric measurements, is performed to derive gain factors from near-concurrent observations in TOA radiance and reflectance domains.

192 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A conceptual model of police response to persons with mental illness is presented that accounts for officer, organizational, mental health system and community level factors likely to influence implementation and effectiveness of CIT and other approaches.

192 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results indicate that evaluation of survey questions to identify key terms that are not consistently understood and defining unclear terms are ways to reduce systematic error in survey measurement.
Abstract: Although writing clear questions is accepted as a gen- eral goal in surveys, procedures to ensure that each key term is consistently understood are not routine. Researchers who do not adequately test respondent understanding of questions must as- sume that ambiguity will not have a large or systematic effect on their results. Seven questions that were drawn from questions used in national health surveys were subjected to special pretest procedures and found to contain one or more poorly defined terms. When the questions were revised to clarify the definition of key terms, significantly different estimates resulted. The impli- cation is that unclear terms are likely to produce biased esti- mates. The results indicate that evaluation of survey questions to identify key terms that are not consistently understood and defining unclear terms are ways to reduce systematic error in survey measurement.

191 citations


Authors

Showing all 6667 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Derek R. Lovley16858295315
Wei Li1581855124748
Susan E. Hankinson15178988297
Roger J. Davis147498103478
Thomas P. Russell141101280055
George Alverson1401653105074
Robert H. Brown136117479247
C. Dallapiccola1361717101947
Paul T. Costa13340688454
Robert R. McCrae13231390960
David Julian McClements131113771123
Mauro Giavalisco12841269967
Benjamin Brau12897172704
Douglas T. Golenbock12331761267
Zhifeng Ren12269571212
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
185.3K papers, 9.9M citations

88% related

Rutgers University
159.4K papers, 6.7M citations

87% related

Boston University
119.6K papers, 6.2M citations

87% related

Arizona State University
109.6K papers, 4.4M citations

87% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

86% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202367
2022131
2021833
2020851
2019823
2018776