Institution
University of Minnesota
Education•Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States•
About: University of Minnesota is a education organization based out in Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 117432 authors who have published 257986 publications receiving 11944239 citations. The organization is also known as: University of Minnesota, Twin Cities & University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.
Topics: Population, Transplantation, Poison control, Health care, Cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors develop a theoretical extension to the basic transaction cost model by combining insights from dependence theory with the TCA approach, and introduce offsetting investments as a means of reducing transaction costs.
Abstract: The authors develop a theoretical extension to the basic transaction cost model by combining insights from dependence theory with the TCA approach. They introduce offsetting investments as a means ...
1,526 citations
••
TL;DR: The authors developed consensus on the name of the construct, identified reliable measures of the dimensions of the concept, and completed the construct validation studies needed to move research and intervention forward to promote school completion and enhanced educational outcomes for all students.
Abstract: Research supports the connection between engagement, achievement, and school behavior across levels of economic and social advantage and disadvantage. Despite increasing interest and scientific findings, a number of interrelated conceptual and methodological issues must be addressed to advance this construct, particularly for designing data-supported interventions that promote school completion and enhanced educational outcomes for all students. Of particular concern is the need to (a) develop consensus on the name of the construct, (b) identify reliable measures of the dimensions of the construct, and (c) complete the construct validation studies needed to move research and intervention forward. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
1,521 citations
••
University of Oxford1, University of Minnesota2, International Food Policy Research Institute3, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation4, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research5, Technical University of Madrid6, Wageningen University and Research Centre7, Chatham House8, Stockholm Resilience Centre9, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences10, Bioversity International11, American University of Beirut12, Johns Hopkins University13, University of California, Santa Barbara14, Harvard University15
TL;DR: A global model finds that the environmental impacts of the food system could increase by 60–90% by 2050, and that dietary changes, improvements in technologies and management, and reductions in food loss and waste will all be needed to mitigate these impacts.
Abstract: The food system is a major driver of climate change, changes in land use, depletion of freshwater resources, and pollution of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems through excessive nitrogen and phosphorus inputs. Here we show that between 2010 and 2050, as a result of expected changes in population and income levels, the environmental effects of the food system could increase by 50–90% in the absence of technological changes and dedicated mitigation measures, reaching levels that are beyond the planetary boundaries that define a safe operating space for humanity. We analyse several options for reducing the environmental effects of the food system, including dietary changes towards healthier, more plant-based diets, improvements in technologies and management, and reductions in food loss and waste. We find that no single measure is enough to keep these effects within all planetary boundaries simultaneously, and that a synergistic combination of measures will be needed to sufficiently mitigate the projected increase in environmental pressures.
1,521 citations
••
TL;DR: More than 1,200 research studies have been conducted in the past 11 decades on cooperative, competitive, and individualistic efforts as mentioned in this paper, and the results from these studies have validated, modified, refined, and extended the theory.
Abstract: The widespread and increasing use of cooperative learning is one of the great success stories of social and educational psychology. Its success largely rests on the relationships among theory, research, and practice. Social interdependence theory provides a foundation on which cooperative learning is built. More than 1,200 research studies have been conducted in the past 11 decades on cooperative, competitive, and individualistic efforts. Findings from these studies have validated, modified, refined, and extended the theory. From the theory, procedures for the teacher’s role in using formal and informal cooperative learning and cooperative base groups have been operationalized. Those procedures are widely used by educators throughout the world. The applications have resulted in revisions of the theory and the generation of new research.
1,521 citations
•
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory1, University of Zurich2, Stanford University3, College of William & Mary4, University of Genoa5, University of Urbino6, CERN7, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics8, Cornell University9, Argonne National Laboratory10, ETH Zurich11, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research12, Hillsdale College13, Spanish National Research Council14, Tohoku University15, Ohio State University16, University of California, San Diego17, University of California, Berkeley18, Aix-Marseille University19, University of Minnesota20, University of Alabama21, University of Helsinki22, California Institute of Technology23, George Washington University24, University of Kansas25, RWTH Aachen University26, Boston University27, University of California, Los Angeles28, Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques29, University of Pennsylvania30, University of Tokyo31, University of Delaware32, Fermilab33, Carnegie Mellon University34, University of California, Santa Cruz35, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory36, University of Washington37, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology38, Heidelberg University39, Florida State University40, Carleton University41, National Science Foundation42, University of Mainz43, University of Edinburgh44, University of Chicago45, Brookhaven National Laboratory46, Kent State University47, Paul Scherrer Institute48, Max Planck Society49, Massachusetts Institute of Technology50, Nagoya University51, Harvard University52
TL;DR: In this article, a biennial review summarizes much of particle physics using data from previous editions., plus 2778 new measurements from 645 papers, including measurements of gauge bosons, leptons, quarks, mesons, and baryons.
Abstract: This biennial Review summarizes much of particle physics. Using data from previous editions., plus 2778 new measurements from 645 papers, we list, evaluate, and average measured properties of gauge bosons, leptons, quarks, mesons, and baryons. We also summarize searches for hypothetical particles such as Higgs bosons, heavy neutrinos, and supersymmetric particles. All the particle properties and search limits are listed in Summary Tables. We also give numerous tables, figures, formulae, and reviews of topics such as the Standard Model, particle detectors., probability, and statistics. Among the 108 reviews are many that are new or heavily revised including those on CKM quark-mixing matrix, V-ud & V-us, V-cb & V-ub, top quark, muon anomalous magnetic moment, extra dimensions, particle detectors, cosmic background radiation, dark matter, cosmological parameters, and big bang cosmology.
1,520 citations
Authors
Showing all 118112 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Walter C. Willett | 334 | 2399 | 413322 |
David J. Hunter | 213 | 1836 | 207050 |
David Miller | 203 | 2573 | 204840 |
Mark I. McCarthy | 200 | 1028 | 187898 |
Dennis W. Dickson | 191 | 1243 | 148488 |
David H. Weinberg | 183 | 700 | 171424 |
Eric Boerwinkle | 183 | 1321 | 170971 |
John C. Morris | 183 | 1441 | 168413 |
Aaron R. Folsom | 181 | 1118 | 134044 |
H. S. Chen | 179 | 2401 | 178529 |
Jie Zhang | 178 | 4857 | 221720 |
Jasvinder A. Singh | 176 | 2382 | 223370 |
Feng Zhang | 172 | 1278 | 181865 |
Gang Chen | 167 | 3372 | 149819 |
Hongfang Liu | 166 | 2356 | 156290 |