scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Missouri

EducationColumbia, Missouri, United States
About: University of Missouri is a education organization based out in Columbia, Missouri, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 41427 authors who have published 83598 publications receiving 2911437 citations. The organization is also known as: Mizzou & Missouri-Columbia.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The interaction of EDCs with other factors that impact growth during fetal and neonatal life, such as placental blood flow and nutrient transport to fetuses, and how these influence fetal growth and abnormalities in homeostatic control systems required to maintain normal body weight throughout life are discussed.

398 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To better integrate behavioral and ecological data on amphibian movements with the use of spatially explicit demographic models and guide effective conservation solutions, a synopsis of the literature regarding behavior, ecology, and evolution of movement in pond-breeding amphibians possessing biphasic life cycles is presented.
Abstract: Understanding the movement of animals is critical to many aspects of conservation such as spread of emerging disease, proliferation of invasive species, changes in land-use patterns, and responses to global climate change. Movement processes are especially important for amphibian management and conservation as species declines and extinctions worldwide become ever more apparent. To better integrate behavioral and ecological data on amphibian movements with our use of spatially explicit demographic models and guide effective conservation solutions, I present 1) a synopsis of the literature regarding behavior, ecology, and evolution of movement in pond-breeding amphibians possessing biphasic life cycles to distinguish between migration and dispersal processes, 2) a working hypothesis of juvenile-based dispersal, and 3) a discussion of conservation issues that follow from distinguishing the spatial and temporal movements of amphibians at different scales. I define amphibian migration as intrapopulat...

398 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article presents a Bayes factor solution for inference in multiple regression, providing a web applet for convenient computation and guidance and context for use of these priors, and discusses the interpretation and advantages of the advocated Bayes factors evidence measures.
Abstract: In this article, we present a Bayes factor solution for inference in multiple regression. Bayes factors are principled measures of the relative evidence from data for various models or positions, including models that embed null hypotheses. In this regard, they may be used to state positive evidence for a lack of an effect, which is not possible in conventional significance testing. One obstacle to the adoption of Bayes factor in psychological science is a lack of guidance and software. Recently, Liang, Paulo, Molina, Clyde, and Berger (2008) developed computationally attractive default Bayes factors for multiple regression designs. We provide a web applet for convenient computation and guidance and context for use of these priors. We discuss the interpretation and advantages of the advocated Bayes factor evidence measures.

398 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors reported reduced sperm concentration and motility in fertile men in a U.S. agrarian area (Columbia, MO) relative to men from urban centers (Minneapolis, MN; Los Angeles, CA; New York, NY).
Abstract: We previously reported reduced sperm concentration and motility in fertile men in a U.S. agrarian area (Columbia, MO) relative to men from U.S. urban centers (Minneapolis, MN; Los Angeles, CA; New York, NY). In the present study we address the hypothesis that pesticides currently used in agriculture in the Midwest contributed to these differences in semen quality. We selected men in whom all semen parameters (concentration, percentage sperm with normal morphology, and percentage motile sperm) were low (cases) and men in whom all semen parameters were within normal limits (controls) within Missouri and Minnesota (sample sizes of 50 and 36, respectively) and measured metabolites of eight current-use pesticides in urine samples provided at the time of semen collection. All pesticide analyses were conducted blind with respect to center and case-control status. Pesticide metabolite levels were elevated in Missouri cases, compared with controls, for the herbicides alachlor and atrazine and for the insecticide diazinon [2-isopropoxy-4-methyl-pyrimidinol (IMPY)]; for Wilcoxon rank test, p = 0.0007, 0.012, and 0.0004 for alachlor, atrazine, and IMPY, respectively. Men from Missouri with high levels of alachlor or IMPY were significantly more likely to be cases than were men with low levels [odds ratios (ORs) = 30.0 and 16.7 for alachlor and IMPY, respectively], as were men with atrazine levels higher than the limit of detection (OR = 11.3). The herbicides 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) and metolachlor were also associated with poor semen quality in some analyses, whereas acetochlor levels were lower in cases than in controls (p = 0.04). No significant associations were seen for any pesticides within Minnesota, where levels of agricultural pesticides were low, or for the insect repellent DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide) or the malathion metabolite malathion dicarboxylic acid. These associations between current-use pesticides and reduced semen quality suggest that agricultural chemicals may have contributed to the reduction in semen quality in fertile men from mid-Missouri we reported previously.

397 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska1, Kari Alitalo2, Elizabeth Allen3, Andrey Anisimov2, Alfred C. Aplin4, Robert Auerbach5, Hellmut G. Augustin6, Hellmut G. Augustin7, David O. Bates8, Judy R. van Beijnum9, R. Hugh F. Bender10, Gabriele Bergers3, Gabriele Bergers11, Andreas Bikfalvi12, Joyce Bischoff13, Barbara C. Böck6, Barbara C. Böck7, Peter C. Brooks14, Federico Bussolino15, Bertan Cakir13, Peter Carmeliet3, Daniel Castranova16, Anca Maria Cimpean, Ondine Cleaver17, George Coukos18, George E. Davis19, Michele De Palma20, Anna Dimberg21, Ruud P.M. Dings22, Valentin Djonov23, Andrew C. Dudley24, Neil Dufton25, Sarah-Maria Fendt3, Napoleone Ferrara26, Marcus Fruttiger27, Dai Fukumura13, Bart Ghesquière3, Bart Ghesquière28, Yan Gong13, Robert J. Griffin22, Adrian L. Harris29, Christopher C.W. Hughes10, Nan W. Hultgren10, M. Luisa Iruela-Arispe30, Melita Irving18, Rakesh K. Jain13, Raghu Kalluri31, Joanna Kalucka3, Robert S. Kerbel32, Jan Kitajewski33, Ingeborg Klaassen34, Hynda K. Kleinmann35, Pieter Koolwijk18, Elisabeth Kuczynski32, Brenda R. Kwak1, Koen Marien, Juan M. Melero-Martin13, Lance L. Munn13, Roberto F. Nicosia4, Agnès Noël36, Jussi Nurro37, Anna-Karin Olsson21, Tatiana V. Petrova38, Kristian Pietras, Roberto Pili39, Jeffrey W. Pollard40, Mark J. Post41, Paul H.A. Quax42, Gabriel A. Rabinovich43, Marius Raica, Anna M. Randi25, Domenico Ribatti44, Curzio Rüegg45, Reinier O. Schlingemann34, Reinier O. Schlingemann18, Stefan Schulte-Merker, Lois E.H. Smith13, Jonathan W. Song46, Steven A. Stacker47, Jimmy Stalin, Amber N. Stratman16, Maureen Van de Velde36, Victor W.M. van Hinsbergh18, Peter B. Vermeulen48, Johannes Waltenberger49, Brant M. Weinstein16, Hong Xin26, Bahar Yetkin-Arik34, Seppo Ylä-Herttuala37, Mervin C. Yoder39, Arjan W. Griffioen9 
University of Geneva1, University of Helsinki2, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven3, University of Washington4, University of Wisconsin-Madison5, Heidelberg University6, German Cancer Research Center7, University of Nottingham8, VU University Amsterdam9, University of California, Irvine10, University of California, San Francisco11, French Institute of Health and Medical Research12, Harvard University13, Maine Medical Center14, University of Turin15, National Institutes of Health16, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center17, University of Lausanne18, University of Missouri19, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne20, Uppsala University21, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences22, University of Bern23, University of Virginia24, Imperial College London25, University of California, San Diego26, University College London27, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology28, University of Oxford29, University of California, Los Angeles30, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center31, University of Toronto32, University of Illinois at Chicago33, University of Amsterdam34, George Washington University35, University of Liège36, University of Eastern Finland37, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research38, Indiana University39, University of Edinburgh40, Maastricht University41, Loyola University Medical Center42, National Scientific and Technical Research Council43, University of Bari44, University of Fribourg45, Ohio State University46, University of Melbourne47, University of Antwerp48, University of Münster49
TL;DR: In vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro bioassays that are available for the evaluation of angiogenesis are described and critical aspects that are relevant for their execution and proper interpretation are highlighted.
Abstract: The formation of new blood vessels, or angiogenesis, is a complex process that plays important roles in growth and development, tissue and organ regeneration, as well as numerous pathological conditions. Angiogenesis undergoes multiple discrete steps that can be individually evaluated and quantified by a large number of bioassays. These independent assessments hold advantages but also have limitations. This article describes in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro bioassays that are available for the evaluation of angiogenesis and highlights critical aspects that are relevant for their execution and proper interpretation. As such, this collaborative work is the first edition of consensus guidelines on angiogenesis bioassays to serve for current and future reference.

397 citations


Authors

Showing all 41750 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Walter C. Willett3342399413322
Meir J. Stampfer2771414283776
Russel J. Reiter1691646121010
Chad A. Mirkin1641078134254
Robert Stone1601756167901
Howard I. Scher151944101737
Rajesh Kumar1494439140830
Joseph T. Hupp14173182647
Lihong V. Wang136111872482
Stephen R. Carpenter131464109624
Jan A. Staessen130113790057
Robert S. Brown130124365822
Mauro Giavalisco12841269967
Kenneth J. Pienta12767164531
Matthew W. Gillman12652955835
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Wisconsin-Madison
237.5K papers, 11.8M citations

97% related

University of Minnesota
257.9K papers, 11.9M citations

97% related

Cornell University
235.5K papers, 12.2M citations

97% related

Ohio State University
222.7K papers, 8.3M citations

96% related

University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023120
2022532
20213,697
20203,683
20193,339
20183,182