University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

About: University of Modena and Reggio Emilia is a education organization based out in Modena, Italy. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 8179 authors who have published 22418 publications receiving 671337 citations. The organization is also known as: Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia & Universita degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia.

Anti-Mullerian hormone plasma levels in spontaneous menstrual cycle and during treatment with FSH to induce ovulation

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is member of the transforming growth factor-b superfamily of growth factors. AMH is detected in serum from women of reproductive age and its levels vary slightly with the menstrual cycle, reaching the peak value in the late follicular phase. The present study was undertaken to assess the effect of controlled ovarian stimulation on AMH secretion by the ovary in healthy women in order to obtain more insight into the relationship between this peptide and gonadal steroids. METHODS: Twenty-four normally cycling women attending the infertility clinic volunteered for this study and AMH was measured in blood samples obtained during both spontaneous and FSH-treated cycles. RESULTS: AMH plasma levels did not change signifi- cantly from day 2 to day 6 in spontaneous cycles. On the contrary, AMH levels decreased progressively from day 2 to day 6 in FSH-treated cycles. A significant positive correlation was found between the decrease in AMH and the increase in estradiol plasma levels in FSH-treated cycles and between basal AMH and the peak estradiol (E2) during exogenous FSH administration. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that AMH plasma levels did not change during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle and that exogenous FSH administration is followed by a significant reduction in AMH levels which is probably secondary to the gonadotrophin effect on the process of follicular development.

Safety of retroviral gene marking with a truncated NGF receptor.

Abstract: To the editor—Random integration into the host cell genome and inappropriate transgene expression are major safety concerns for the clinical use of retroviral vectors. Li et al. recently reported a leukemic transformation of mouse bone marrow cells caused by integration of a transgene-carrying retroviral vector into the Evi1 proto-oncogene. They suggested that expression of the transgene, a truncated form of the p75 low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor (∆LNGFR) with most of the intracytoplasmic tail deleted (from residue 248), contributed to the leukemic progression. Because ∆LNGFR is used as a surface marker in gene therapy clinical trials aimed at controlling graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after bone marrow transplantation (BMT), a critical assessment of the potential risks associated with the use of such a molecule is essential. In a collaborative effort between 17 independent groups of investigators, we have accumulated both pre-clinical and clinical evidence supporting the safety of ∆LNGFR as a cell-marking molecule. Cumulative data obtained from >300 mice transplanted with bone marrow cells transduced with ∆LNGFR-expressing retroviral vectors showed normal engraftment, persistence and differentiation of ∆LNGFR-expressing hematopoietic stemprogenitor cells (HSCs) in primary, secondary and tertiary BMT recipients, with no adverse events (Table 1 and Supplementary Information online). Over 100 of these mice were monitored for >20 weeks after BMT; more than 70 animals, including 16 recipients of secondary or tertiary BMT, were monitored for >28 weeks. Considering that a total of >1 × 10 transduced cells were transplanted, and assuming an average of one retroviral integration per cell, we estimate the risk of oncogenic transformation after transduction with a ∆LNGFR-encoding retroviral vector to be <1 in 10 integration events. Therefore, expression of ∆LNGFR could not have increased the expected frequency of an insertional oncogenesis event, which has been previously estimated at 10 to 10 per insertion event. Expression of ∆LNGFR did not alter the function or survival of T lymphocytes derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells transduced with a variety of vectors and studied in different animal models. In pre-clinical models of post-BMT GVHD, no difference in the ability to induce donor chimerism or to mediate GVHD was observed for ∆LNGFR-expressing T cells, as compared with control T cells, in 356 mice, 200 rats and 3 dogs (Table 1 and Supplementary Information online), again with no adverse events. Analysis of 102 independent transductions of human peripheral lymphocytes with two different vectors (SFCMM-3 and SFCM) encoding the same ∆LNGFR detected no change in the expression of markers of lineage, activation or adhesion, or in the proliferative capacity of T cells, as assayed by limiting dilution after polyclonal in vitro stimulation. All cells remained strictly dependent on interleukin-2 for growth and survival, and the Safety of retroviral gene marking with a truncated NGF receptor

Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta‐analysis

Abstract: Background Different therapeutic strategies are available for the treatment of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), including immunomodulators, immunosuppressants and biologics. Although there is consensus that these therapies reduce the frequency of relapses, their relative benefit in delaying new relapses or disability worsening remains unclear due to the limited number of direct comparison trials. Objectives To compare the benefit and acceptability of interferon beta-1b, interferon beta-1a (Avonex, Rebif), glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, mitoxantrone, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, alemtuzumab, pegylated interferon beta-1a, daclizumab, laquinimod, azathioprine and immunoglobulins for the treatment of people with RRMS and to provide a ranking of these treatments according to their benefit and acceptability, defined as the proportion of participants who withdrew due to any adverse event. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS Group Trials Register, which contains trials from CENTRAL (2014, Issue 9), MEDLINE (1966 to 2014), EMBASE (1974 to 2014), CINAHL (1981 to 2014), LILACS (1982 to 2014), clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO trials registry, and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports. We ran the most recent search in September 2014. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that studied one or more of the 15 treatments as monotherapy, compared to placebo or to another active agent, for use in adults with RRMS. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently identified studies from the search results and performed data extraction. We performed data synthesis by pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. We assessed the quality of the body of evidence for outcomes within the network meta-analysis according to GRADE, as very low, low, moderate or high. Main results We included 39 studies in this review, in which 25,113 participants were randomised. The majority of the included trials were short-term studies, with a median duration of 24 months. Twenty-four (60%) were placebo-controlled and 15 (40%) were head-to-head studies.Network meta-analysis showed that, in terms of a protective effect against the recurrence of relapses in RRMS during the first 24 months of treatment, alemtuzumab, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, and fingolimod outperformed other drugs. The most effective drug was alemtuzumab (risk ratio (RR) versus placebo 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 0.55; surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) 96%; moderate quality evidence), followed by mitoxantrone (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.81; SUCRA 92%; very low quality evidence), natalizumab (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.66; SUCRA 88%; high quality evidence), and fingolimod (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.81; SUCRA 71%; moderate quality evidence).Disability worsening was based on a surrogate marker, defined as irreversible worsening confirmed at three-month follow-up, measured during the first 24 months in the majority of included studies. Both direct and indirect comparisons revealed that the most effective treatments were mitoxantrone (RR versus placebo 0.20, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.84; SUCRA 96%; low quality evidence), alemtuzumab (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.48; SUCRA 94%; low quality evidence), and natalizumab (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.85; SUCRA 74%; moderate quality evidence).Almost all of the agents included in this review were associated with a higher proportion of participants who withdrew due to any adverse event compared to placebo. Based on the network meta-analysis methodology, the corresponding RR estimates versus placebo over the first 24 months of follow-up were: mitoxantrone 9.92 (95% CI 0.54 to 168.84), fingolimod 1.69 (95% CI 1.32 to 2.17), natalizumab 1.53 (95% CI 0.93 to 2.53), and alemtuzumab 0.72 (95% CI 0.32 to 1.61).Information on serious adverse events (SAEs) was scanty, characterised by heterogeneous results and based on a very low number of events observed during the short-term duration of the trials included in this review. Authors' conclusions Conservative interpretation of these results is warranted, since most of the included treatments have been evaluated in few trials. The GRADE approach recommends providing implications for practice based on moderate to high quality evidence. Our review shows that alemtuzumab, natalizumab, and fingolimod are the best choices for preventing clinical relapses in people with RRMS, but this evidence is limited to the first 24 months of follow-up. For the prevention of disability worsening in the short term (24 months), only natalizumab shows a beneficial effect on the basis of moderate quality evidence (all of the other estimates were based on low to very low quality evidence). Currently, therefore, insufficient evidence is available to evaluate treatments for the prevention of irreversible disability worsening.There are two additional major concerns that have to be considered. First, the benefit of all of these treatments beyond two years is uncertain and this is a relevant issue for a disease with a duration of 30 to 40 years. Second, short-term trials provide scanty and poorly reported safety data and do not provide useful evidence in order to obtain a reliable risk profile of treatments. In order to provide long-term information on the safety of the treatments included in this review, it will be necessary also to evaluate non-randomised studies and post-marketing reports released from the regulatory agencies. Finally, more than 70% of the studies included in this review were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies and this may have influenced the results.There are three needs that the research agenda should address. First, randomised trials of direct comparisons between active agents would be useful, avoiding further placebo-controlled studies. Second, follow-up of the original trial cohorts should be mandatory. Third, more studies are needed to assess the medium and long-term benefit and safety of immunotherapies and the comparative safety of different agents.

Usutu virus infection in a patient who underwent orthotropic liver transplantation, italy, august-september 2009

Abstract: We report a case of Usutu virus (USUV)-related illness in a patient that underwent an orthotropic liver transplant (OLT). Post transplant, the patient developed clinical signs of a possible neuroinvasive disease with a significant loss of cerebral functions. USUV was isolated in Vero E6 cells from a plasma sample obtained immediately before the surgery, and USUV RNA was demonstrated by RT-PCR and sequencing. This report enlarges the panel of emerging mosquito-borne flavivirus-related disease in humans.