Institution
University of Montpellier
Education•Montpellier, Languedoc-Roussillon, France•
About: University of Montpellier is a(n) education organization based out in Montpellier, Languedoc-Roussillon, France. It is known for research contribution in the topic(s): Population & Membrane. The organization has 26816 authors who have published 53843 publication(s) receiving 1646905 citation(s). The organization is also known as: Université de Montpellier.
Topics: Population, Membrane, Stars, Raman spectroscopy, Adsorption
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
15,376 citations
TL;DR: UNLABELLED Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution (APE) is a package written in the R language for use in molecular evolution and phylogenetics that provides both utility functions for reading and writing data and manipulating phylogenetic trees.
Abstract: Summary: Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution (APE) is a package written in the R language for use in molecular evolution and phylogenetics. APE provides both utility functions for reading and writing data and manipulating phylogenetic trees, as well as several advanced methods for phylogenetic and evolutionary analysis (e.g. comparative and population genetic methods). APE takes advantage of the many R functions for statistics and graphics, and also provides a flexible framework for developing and implementing further statistical methods for the analysis of evolutionary processes.
Availability: The program is free and available from the official R package archive at http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES.html#ape. APE is licensed under the GNU General Public License.
9,729 citations
TL;DR: This note summarizes developments of the genepop software since its first description in 1995, and in particular those new to version 4.0: an extended input format, several estimators of neighbourhood size under isolation by distance, new estimators and confidence intervals for null allele frequency, and less important extensions to previous options.
Abstract: This note summarizes developments of the genepop software since its first description in 1995, and in particular those new to version 4.0: an extended input format, several estimators of neighbourhood size under isolation by distance, new estimators and confidence intervals for null allele frequency, and less important extensions to previous options. genepop now runs under Linux as well as under Windows, and can be entirely controlled by batch calls.
7,572 citations
TL;DR: It is proposed that bivalent domains silence developmental genes in ES cells while keeping them poised for activation, highlighting the importance of DNA sequence in defining the initial epigenetic landscape and suggesting a novel chromatin-based mechanism for maintaining pluripotency.
Abstract: The most highly conserved noncoding elements (HCNEs) in mammalian genomes cluster within regions enriched for genes encoding developmentally important transcription factors (TFs). This suggests that HCNE-rich regions may contain key regulatory controls involved in development. We explored this by examining histone methylation in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells across 56 large HCNE-rich loci. We identified a specific modification pattern, termed "bivalent domains," consisting of large regions of H3 lysine 27 methylation harboring smaller regions of H3 lysine 4 methylation. Bivalent domains tend to coincide with TF genes expressed at low levels. We propose that bivalent domains silence developmental genes in ES cells while keeping them poised for activation. We also found striking correspondences between genome sequence and histone methylation in ES cells, which become notably weaker in differentiated cells. These results highlight the importance of DNA sequence in defining the initial epigenetic landscape and suggest a novel chromatin-based mechanism for maintaining pluripotency.
4,800 citations
Medical University of Vienna1, University of Amsterdam2, Leiden University Medical Center3, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust4, Chapel Allerton Hospital5, Humboldt State University6, Oregon Health & Science University7, Utrecht University8, VU University Medical Center9, University of Montpellier10, University of Belgrade11, Erasmus University Rotterdam12, University of Paris-Sud13, Charles University in Prague14, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre15, University of Cologne16, Weston Education Centre17, Tufts University18
TL;DR: These recommendations intend informing rheumatologists, patients, national rheumology societies, hospital officials, social security agencies and regulators about EULAR's most recent consensus on the management of RA, aimed at attaining best outcomes with current therapies.
Abstract: In this article, the 2010 European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs and bDMARDs, respectively) have been updated. The 2013 update has been developed by an international task force, which based its decisions mostly on evidence from three systematic literature reviews (one each on sDMARDs, including glucocorticoids, bDMARDs and safety aspects of DMARD therapy); treatment strategies were also covered by the searches. The evidence presented was discussed and summarised by the experts in the course of a consensus finding and voting process. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were derived and levels of agreement (strengths of recommendations) were determined. Fourteen recommendations were developed (instead of 15 in 2010). Some of the 2010 recommendations were deleted, and others were amended or split. The recommendations cover general aspects, such as attainment of remission or low disease activity using a treat-to-target approach, and the need for shared decision-making between rheumatologists and patients. The more specific items relate to starting DMARD therapy using a conventional sDMARD (csDMARD) strategy in combination with glucocorticoids, followed by the addition of a bDMARD or another csDMARD strategy (after stratification by presence or absence of adverse risk factors) if the treatment target is not reached within 6 months (or improvement not seen at
4,046 citations
Authors
Showing all 26816 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Jean Bousquet | 145 | 1288 | 96769 |
Tomas Ganz | 141 | 480 | 73316 |
Jean-Marie Tarascon | 136 | 853 | 137673 |
Johann Cohen-Tanugi | 132 | 434 | 58881 |
Beatrice H. Hahn | 129 | 458 | 69206 |
Nicholas A. Kotov | 123 | 574 | 55210 |
F. Piron | 118 | 270 | 47676 |
Robert H. Crabtree | 113 | 678 | 48634 |
Christian Serre | 110 | 419 | 56800 |
Alan Cooper | 108 | 746 | 45772 |
Serge Hercberg | 106 | 942 | 56791 |
Louis Bernatchez | 106 | 568 | 35682 |
Joël Bockaert | 105 | 480 | 39464 |
E. Nuss | 104 | 220 | 38488 |
Jordi Rello | 103 | 694 | 35994 |