scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Nebraska Omaha

EducationOmaha, Nebraska, United States
About: University of Nebraska Omaha is a education organization based out in Omaha, Nebraska, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 4526 authors who have published 8905 publications receiving 213914 citations. The organization is also known as: UNO & University of Omaha.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors found that bereaved parents experienced a dialectical contradiction between trying to grieve their child's death together as a couple and apart as individuals, and that they experienced a contradiction between being both open and closed when talking with one another about their children's death.
Abstract: The researchers adopted relational dialectics theory (Baxter & Montgomery, 1996) to examine the discourse of 37 bereaved parents. Research questions guiding the study were what dialectical contradictions do bereaved parents experience when communicating with their marital partner after their child's death and how do bereaved parents and their marital partners communicatively negotiate the dialectical contradictions they experience? Our analysis revealed that bereaved parents experienced a dialectical contradiction between trying to grieve their child's death together as a couple and apart as individuals. Likewise, parents experienced a contradiction between being both open and closed when talking with one another about their child's death. Results describe how parents negotiated these contradictions, and implications for professionals are discussed.

68 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that older-appearing faces are less attractive, but more distinctive and memorable than younger-appearance faces, those closer to the average face.
Abstract: A standard facial caricature algorithm has been applied to a three-dimensional (3-D) representation of human heads, those of Caucasian male and female young adults. Observers viewed unfamiliar faces at four levels of caricature—anticaricature, veridical, moderate caricature, and extreme caricature—and made ratings of attractiveness and distinctiveness (experiment 1) or learned to identify them (experiment 2). There were linear increases in perceived distinctiveness and linear decreases in perceived attractiveness as the degree of facial caricature (Euclidean distance from the average face in 3-D-grounded face space) increased. Observers learned to identify faces presented at either level of positive caricature more efficiently than they did with either uncaricatured or anticaricatured faces. Using the same faces, 3-D representation, and caricature levels, O'Toole, Vetter, Volz, and Salter (1997, Perception 26 719–732) had shown a linear increase in judgments of face age as a function of degree of caricatu...

67 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: From 1987 until 2000, Division I college football players in general have become bigger, stronger, faster, and more powerful.
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare normative data from present Division I National Collegiate Athletic Association football teams to those from 1987. Players were divided into 8 positions for comparisons: quarterbacks (QB), running backs (RB), receivers (WR), tight ends (TE), offensive linemen (OL), defensive linemen (DL), linebackers (LB), and defensive backs (DB). Comparisons included height, body mass, bench press and squat strength, vertical jump, vertical jump power, 40-yd-dash speed, and body composition. Independent t-tests were used to analyze the data with level of significance set at p < 0.01. Significant differences (p < 0.01) were found in 50 of 88 comparisons. From 1987 until 2000, Division I college football players in general have become bigger, stronger, faster, and more powerful. Further research is warranted to investigate if these trends will continue.

67 citations


Authors

Showing all 4588 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Darell D. Bigner13081990558
Dan L. Longo12569756085
William B. Dobyns10543038956
Eamonn Martin Quigley10368539585
Howard E. Gendelman10156739460
Alexander V. Kabanov9944734519
Douglas T. Fearon9427835140
Dapeng Yu9474533613
John E. Wagner9448835586
Zbigniew K. Wszolek9357639943
Surinder K. Batra8756430653
Frank L. Graham8525539619
Jing Zhou8453337101
Manish Sharma82140733361
Peter F. Wright7725221498
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
George Mason University
39.9K papers, 1.3M citations

90% related

Arizona State University
109.6K papers, 4.4M citations

89% related

University of South Florida
72.6K papers, 2.5M citations

89% related

University of South Carolina
59.9K papers, 2.2M citations

88% related

George Washington University
56.9K papers, 1.8M citations

88% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202323
2022108
2021585
2020537
2019492
2018421