Institution
University of Neuchâtel
Education•Neuchâtel, Switzerland•
About: University of Neuchâtel is a education organization based out in Neuchâtel, Switzerland. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Laser & Ruthenium. The organization has 2163 authors who have published 4052 publications receiving 123919 citations. The organization is also known as: Université de Neuchâtel & University of Neuchatel.
Topics: Laser, Ruthenium, Population, Semiconductor laser theory, Ligand
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of St Andrews1, University of Oldenburg2, Natural History Museum3, Naturalis4, Centre national de la recherche scientifique5, Michigan State University6, University of Lausanne7, University of Wyoming8, Queen Mary University of London9, University of Sheffield10, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis11, University of Oslo12, University of Vienna13, University of Vermont14, University of East Anglia15, Spanish National Research Council16, University of Cambridge17, University of Konstanz18, University of Zurich19, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh20, Harvard University21, Autonomous University of Madrid22, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology23, Boston University24, Max Planck Society25, University of Neuchâtel26, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill27, Lehigh University28, American Museum of Natural History29, University of Montpellier30, University of Liverpool31, Jagiellonian University32, Uppsala University33, German Primate Center34
TL;DR: A perspective on the context and evolutionary significance of hybridization during speciation is offered, highlighting issues of current interest and debate and suggesting that the Dobzhansky–Muller model of hybrid incompatibilities requires a broader interpretation.
Abstract: Hybridization has many and varied impacts on the process of speciation. Hybridization may slow or reverse differentiation by allowing gene flow and recombination. It may accelerate speciation via adaptive introgression or cause near-instantaneous speciation by allopolyploidization. It may have multiple effects at different stages and in different spatial contexts within a single speciation event. We offer a perspective on the context and evolutionary significance of hybridization during speciation, highlighting issues of current interest and debate. In secondary contact zones, it is uncertain if barriers to gene flow will be strengthened or broken down due to recombination and gene flow. Theory and empirical evidence suggest the latter is more likely, except within and around strongly selected genomic regions. Hybridization may contribute to speciation through the formation of new hybrid taxa, whereas introgression of a few loci may promote adaptive divergence and so facilitate speciation. Gene regulatory networks, epigenetic effects and the evolution of selfish genetic material in the genome suggest that the Dobzhansky-Muller model of hybrid incompatibilities requires a broader interpretation. Finally, although the incidence of reinforcement remains uncertain, this and other interactions in areas of sympatry may have knock-on effects on speciation both within and outside regions of hybridization.
1,715 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that γ-ray bursts are sensitive to an energy dispersion predicted by some approaches to quantum gravity, which is sufficient to test theories of quantum gravity.
Abstract: The recent confirmation that at least some γ-ray bursts originate at cosmological distances1,2,3,4 suggests that the radiation from them could be used to probe some of the fundamental laws of physics. Here we show that γ-ray bursts will be sensitive to an energy dispersion predicted by some approaches to quantum gravity. Many of the bursts have structure on relatively rapid timescales5, which means that in principle it is possible to look for energy-dependent dispersion of the radiation, manifested in the arrival times of the photons, if several different energy bands are observed simultaneously. A simple estimate indicates that, because of their high energies and distant origin, observations of these bursts should be sensitive to a dispersion scale that is comparable to the Planck energy scale (∼1019 GeV), which is sufficient to test theories of quantum gravity. Such observations are already possible using existing γ-ray burst detectors.
1,322 citations
••
TL;DR: The advantages and limitations of photovoltaic solar modules for energy generation are reviewed with their operation principles and physical efficiency limits, and recent developments suggest that thin-film crystalline silicon (especially microcrystalline silicon) is becoming a prime candidate for future photov electricity generation.
Abstract: The advantages and limitations of photovoltaic solar modules for energy generation are reviewed with their operation principles and physical efficiency limits. Although the main materials currently used or investigated and the associated fabrication technologies are individually described, emphasis is on silicon-based solar cells. Wafer-based crystalline silicon solar modules dominate in terms of production, but amorphous silicon solar cells have the potential to undercut costs owing, for example, to the roll-to-roll production possibilities for modules. Recent developments suggest that thin-film crystalline silicon (especially microcrystalline silicon) is becoming a prime candidate for future photovoltaics.
1,177 citations
••
Utrecht University1, Université catholique de Louvain2, Institut national de la recherche agronomique3, Centre national de la recherche scientifique4, Université du Québec à Montréal5, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds6, University of Cambridge7, University of Padua8, University of Sussex9, Natural Resources Canada10, Purdue University11, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ12, Smithsonian Institution13, University of Neuchâtel14, University of Saskatchewan15, Washington State University16, University of Bergen17, University of Stirling18
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of the global literature explores these risks and show a growing body of evidence that persistent, low concentrations of these insecticides pose serious risks of undesirable environmental impacts.
Abstract: Since their discovery in the late 1980s, neonicotinoid pesticides have become the most widely used class of insecticides worldwide, with large-scale applications ranging from plant protection (crops, vegetables, fruits), veterinary products, and biocides to invertebrate pest control in fish farming. In this review, we address the phenyl-pyrazole fipronil together with neonicotinoids because of similarities in their toxicity, physicochemical profiles, and presence in the environment. Neonicotinoids and fipronil currently account for approximately one third of the world insecticide market; the annual world production of the archetype neonicotinoid, imidacloprid, was estimated to be ca. 20,000 tonnes active substance in 2010. There were several reasons for the initial success of neonicotinoids and fipronil: (1) there was no known pesticide resistance in target pests, mainly because of their recent development, (2) their physicochemical properties included many advantages over previous generations of insecticides (i.e., organophosphates, carbamates, pyrethroids, etc.), and (3) they shared an assumed reduced operator and consumer risk. Due to their systemic nature, they are taken up by the roots or leaves and translocated to all parts of the plant, which, in turn, makes them effectively toxic to herbivorous insects. The toxicity persists for a variable period of time—depending on the plant, its growth stage, and the amount of pesticide applied. A wide variety of applications are available, including the most common prophylactic non-Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) application by seed coating. As a result of their extensive use and physicochemical properties, these substances can be found in all environmental compartments including soil, water, and air. Neonicotinoids and fipronil operate by disrupting neural transmission in the central nervous system of invertebrates. Neonicotinoids mimic the action of neurotransmitters, while fipronil inhibits neuronal receptors. In doing so, they continuously stimulate neurons leading ultimately to death of target invertebrates. Like virtually all insecticides, they can also have lethal and sublethal impacts on non-target organisms, including insect predators and vertebrates. Furthermore, a range of synergistic effects with other stressors have been documented. Here, we review extensively their metabolic pathways, showing how they form both compound-specific and common metabolites which can themselves be toxic. These may result in prolonged toxicity. Considering their wide commercial expansion, mode of action, the systemic properties in plants, persistence and environmental fate, coupled with limited information about the toxicity profiles of these compounds and their metabolites, neonicotinoids and fipronil may entail significant risks to the environment. A global evaluation of the potential collateral effects of their use is therefore timely. The present paper and subsequent chapters in this review of the global literature explore these risks and show a growing body of evidence that persistent, low concentrations of these insecticides pose serious risks of undesirable environmental impacts.
1,131 citations
••
Smithsonian Institution1, Sun Yat-sen University2, University of California, Berkeley3, Naturalis4, Paris-Sorbonne University5, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais6, University of Vermont7, Federal University of Western Pará8, University of Florida9, James Cook University10, Duke University11, University of Bonn12, University of Neuchâtel13, University of Turku14, University of Alaska Fairbanks15, Missouri Botanical Garden16, National Taiwan University17, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa18, National University of Río Cuarto19, University of Arizona20, Council of Agriculture21, Kaohsiung Medical University22, Chongqing Normal University23, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora24, Nanjing Forestry University25, Iowa State University26, Complutense University of Madrid27, University of Kansas28, Denison University29, University of Zurich30
TL;DR: A modern, comprehensive classification for lycophytes and ferns, down to the genus level, utilizing a community‐based approach, that uses monophyly as the primary criterion for the recognition of taxa, but also aims to preserve existing taxa and circumscriptions that are both widely accepted and consistent with the understanding of pteridophyte phylogeny.
Abstract: Phylogeny has long informed pteridophyte classification. As our ability to infer evolutionary trees has improved, classifications aimed at recognizing natural groups have become increasingly predic ...
971 citations
Authors
Showing all 2232 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Didier Raoult | 173 | 3267 | 153016 |
Paul J. Dyson | 103 | 810 | 42095 |
Philippe Dubois | 101 | 1098 | 48086 |
Andreas Engel | 99 | 448 | 33494 |
Enrico Martinoia | 96 | 260 | 26702 |
Jérôme Faist | 91 | 970 | 37221 |
Antoine Guisan | 85 | 332 | 55475 |
David A. Ritchie | 84 | 1555 | 41123 |
Fernando Quevedo | 82 | 287 | 22879 |
Christophe Ballif | 82 | 696 | 26162 |
Ted C. J. Turlings | 75 | 228 | 20808 |
Bernard Testa | 71 | 437 | 18216 |
Gerta Keller | 71 | 294 | 14012 |
N. F. de Rooij | 67 | 544 | 15726 |
Leone Spiccia | 66 | 395 | 18915 |