Institution
University of New Hampshire
Education•Durham, New Hampshire, United States•
About: University of New Hampshire is a education organization based out in Durham, New Hampshire, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Solar wind. The organization has 9379 authors who have published 24025 publications receiving 1020112 citations. The organization is also known as: UNH.
Topics: Population, Solar wind, Poison control, Magnetosphere, Heliosphere
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Harvard University1, University of Montana2, McMaster University3, Environment Canada4, Ohio State University5, Auburn University6, University of Toronto7, Centre national de la recherche scientifique8, Pennsylvania State University9, University of Wisconsin-Madison10, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign11, Indiana University12, Virginia Commonwealth University13, University of Alberta14, United States Forest Service15, Laval University16, Queen's University17, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences18, Oak Ridge National Laboratory19, Princeton University20, University of Colorado Boulder21, Ensenada Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education22, Ghent University23, University of New Hampshire24, University of California, Los Angeles25
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluate the representation of phenology, and the associated seasonality of ecosystem-scale CO2 exchange, in 14 models participating in the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis.
Abstract: Phenology, by controlling the seasonal activity of vegetation on the land surface, plays a fundamental role in regulating photosynthesis and other ecosystem processes, as well as competitive interactions and feedbacks to the climate system. We conducted an analysis to evaluate the representation of phenology, and the associated seasonality of ecosystem-scale CO2 exchange, in 14 models participating in the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis. Model predictions were evaluated using long-term measurements (emphasizing the period 2000–2006) from 10 forested sites within the AmeriFlux and Fluxnet-Canada networks. In deciduous forests, almost all models consistently predicted that the growing season started earlier, and ended later, than was actually observed; biases of 2 weeks or more were
578 citations
••
TL;DR: This work states that agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating Targets for Sustainable Intensification should be considered as a priority for policy-makers as well as the private sector.
Abstract: http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org XXXX XXXX / Vol. XX No. X BioScience 1 BioScience XX: 1–6. © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Institute of Biological Sciences. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix010 Advance Access publication XXXX XX, XXXX Agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating Targets for Sustainable Intensification
577 citations
••
TL;DR: PNET has been validated against field data from 10 well-studied temperate and boreal forest ecosystems, supporting the central hypothesis that aggregation of climatic data to the monthly scale and biological data such as foliar characteristics to the ecosystem level does not cause a significant loss of information relative to long-term, mean ecosystem responses.
Abstract: PnET is a simple, lumped-parameter, monthlytime-step model of carbon and water balances of forests built on two principal relationships: 1) maximum photosynthetic rate is a function of foliar nitrogen concentration, and 2) stomatal conductance is a function of realized photosynthetic rate. Monthyly leaf area display and carbon and water balances are predicted by combining these with standard equations describing light attenuation in canopies and photosynthetic response to diminishing radiation intensity, along with effects of soil water stress and vapor pressure deficit (VPD). PnET has been validated against field data from 10 well-studied temperate and boreal forest ecosystems, supporting our central hypothesis that aggregation of climatic data to the monthly scale and biological data such as foliar characteristics to the ecosystem level does not cause a significant loss of information relative to long-term, mean ecosystem responses. Sensitivity analyses reveal a diversity of responses among systems to identical alterations in climatic drivers. This suggests that great care should be used in developing generalizations as to how forests will respond to a changing climate. Also critical is the degree to which the temperature responses of photosynthesis and respiration might acclimate to changes in mean temperatures at decadal time scales. An extreme climate change simulation (+3° C maximum temperature, −25% precipitation with no change in minimum temperature or radiation, direct effects of increased atmospheric CO2 ignored) suggests that major increases in water stress, and reductions in biomass production (net carbon gain) and water yield would follow such a change.
573 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors measured the temperature response of microbial efficiency in soils amended with substrates varying in lability, and found that the efficiency with which soil microorganisms use organic matter is dependent on both temperature and substrate quality, with efficiency declining with increasing temperatures for more recalcitrant substrates.
Abstract: Soils are the largest repository of organic carbon in the terrestrial biosphere. Nevertheless, relatively little is known about the factors controlling the efficiency with which microbial communities utilize carbon, and its effect on soil–atmosphere CO2 exchange. Now research using long-term experimental plots suggests that climate warming could alter the decay dynamics of more stable organic-matter compounds with implications for carbon storage in soils and ultimately climate warming. Soils are the largest repository of organic carbon (C) in the terrestrial biosphere and represent an important source of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere, releasing 60–75 Pg C annually through microbial decomposition of organic materials1,2. A primary control on soil CO2 flux is the efficiency with which the microbial community uses C. Despite its critical importance to soil–atmosphere CO2 exchange, relatively few studies have examined the factors controlling soil microbial efficiency. Here, we measured the temperature response of microbial efficiency in soils amended with substrates varying in lability. We also examined the temperature sensitivity of microbial efficiency in response to chronic soil warming in situ. We find that the efficiency with which soil microorganisms use organic matter is dependent on both temperature and substrate quality, with efficiency declining with increasing temperatures for more recalcitrant substrates. However, the utilization efficiency of a more recalcitrant substrate increased at higher temperatures in soils exposed to almost two decades of warming 5 °C above ambient. Our work suggests that climate warming could alter the decay dynamics of more stable organic matter compounds, thereby having a positive feedback to climate that is attenuated by a shift towards a more efficient microbial community in the longer term.
571 citations
••
TL;DR: Current understanding of plant spectral properties with respect to sources of uncertainty at leaf to canopy scales is reviewed and a pattern that emerges suggests a synergy among the scattering effects of leaf-, stem- and canopy-level traits that becomes most apparent in the near-infrared (NIR) region.
Abstract: How plants interact with sunlight is central to the existence of life and provides a window to the functioning of ecosystems. Although the basic properties of leaf spectra have been known for decades, interpreting canopy-level spectra is more challenging because leaf-level effects are complicated by a host of stem- and canopy-level traits. Progress has been made through empirical analyses and models, although both methods have been hampered by a series of persistent challenges. Here, I review current understanding of plant spectral properties with respect to sources of uncertainty at leaf to canopy scales. I also discuss the role of evolutionary convergence in plant functioning and the difficulty of identifying individual properties among a suite of interrelated traits. A pattern that emerges suggests a synergy among the scattering effects of leaf-, stem- and canopy-level traits that becomes most apparent in the near-infrared (NIR) region. This explains the widespread and well-known importance of the NIR region in vegetation remote sensing, but presents an interesting paradox that has yet to be fully explored: that we can often gain more insight about the functioning of plants by examining wavelengths that are not used in photosynthesis than by examining those that are.
571 citations
Authors
Showing all 9489 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Derek R. Lovley | 168 | 582 | 95315 |
Peter B. Reich | 159 | 790 | 110377 |
Jerry M. Melillo | 134 | 383 | 68894 |
Katja Klein | 129 | 1499 | 87817 |
David Finkelhor | 117 | 382 | 58094 |
Howard A. Stone | 114 | 1033 | 64855 |
James O. Hill | 113 | 532 | 69636 |
Tadayuki Takahashi | 112 | 932 | 57501 |
Howard Eichenbaum | 108 | 279 | 44172 |
John D. Aber | 107 | 204 | 48500 |
Andrew W. Strong | 99 | 563 | 42475 |
Charles T. Driscoll | 97 | 554 | 37355 |
Andrew D. Richardson | 94 | 282 | 32850 |
Colin A. Chapman | 92 | 491 | 28217 |
Nicholas W. Lukacs | 91 | 367 | 34057 |