Institution
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Education•Charlotte, North Carolina, United States•
About: University of North Carolina at Charlotte is a education organization based out in Charlotte, North Carolina, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 8772 authors who have published 22239 publications receiving 562529 citations. The organization is also known as: UNC Charlotte & UNCC.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Health care, Visualization, Mental health
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Southern California1, University of Washington2, University of Michigan3, Harvard University4, University of Groningen5, Max Planck Society6, University of Maryland, Baltimore7, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai8, Xi'an Jiaotong University9, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center10, University of North Carolina at Charlotte11, Broad Institute12, European Bioinformatics Institute13, Yale University14, University of California, Davis15, University of Utah16, Pacific Biosciences17, University of California, San Diego18, Illumina19, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research20, Ewha Womans University21, Drexel University22, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston23, Washington University in St. Louis24, University of Malaya25, University of California, San Francisco26, University of British Columbia27, BC Cancer Agency28
TL;DR: A suite of long-read, short- read, strand-specific sequencing technologies, optical mapping, and variant discovery algorithms are applied to comprehensively analyze three trios to define the full spectrum of human genetic variation in a haplotype-resolved manner.
Abstract: The incomplete identification of structural variants (SVs) from whole-genome sequencing data limits studies of human genetic diversity and disease association. Here, we apply a suite of long-read, short-read, strand-specific sequencing technologies, optical mapping, and variant discovery algorithms to comprehensively analyze three trios to define the full spectrum of human genetic variation in a haplotype-resolved manner. We identify 818,054 indel variants (<50 bp) and 27,622 SVs (≥50 bp) per genome. We also discover 156 inversions per genome and 58 of the inversions intersect with the critical regions of recurrent microdeletion and microduplication syndromes. Taken together, our SV callsets represent a three to sevenfold increase in SV detection compared to most standard high-throughput sequencing studies, including those from the 1000 Genomes Project. The methods and the dataset presented serve as a gold standard for the scientific community allowing us to make recommendations for maximizing structural variation sensitivity for future genome sequencing studies.
606 citations
••
TL;DR: Best practices for applying standard PCA are reviewed, useful variants are described, why one may wish to make comparison studies, and a set of metrics that make comparisons possible are described.
Abstract: It has become commonplace to employ principal component analysis to reveal the most important motions in proteins. This method is more commonly known by its acronym, PCA. While most popular molecular dynamics packages inevitably provide PCA tools to analyze protein trajectories, researchers often make inferences of their results without having insight into how to make interpretations, and they are often unaware of limitations and generalizations of such analysis. Here we review best practices for applying standard PCA, describe useful variants, discuss why one may wish to make comparison studies, and describe a set of metrics that make comparisons possible. In practice, one will be forced to make inferences about the essential dynamics of a protein without having the desired amount of samples. Therefore, considerable time is spent on describing how to judge the significance of results, highlighting pitfalls. The topic of PCA is reviewed from the perspective of many practical considerations, and useful recipes are provided.
600 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conduct an application-oriented review of smart meter data analytics following the three stages of analytics, namely, descriptive, predictive and prescriptive analytics, identifying the key application areas as load analysis, load forecasting, and load management.
Abstract: The widespread popularity of smart meters enables an immense amount of fine-grained electricity consumption data to be collected Meanwhile, the deregulation of the power industry, particularly on the delivery side, has continuously been moving forward worldwide How to employ massive smart meter data to promote and enhance the efficiency and sustainability of the power grid is a pressing issue To date, substantial works have been conducted on smart meter data analytics To provide a comprehensive overview of the current research and to identify challenges for future research, this paper conducts an application-oriented review of smart meter data analytics Following the three stages of analytics, namely, descriptive, predictive and prescriptive analytics, we identify the key application areas as load analysis, load forecasting, and load management We also review the techniques and methodologies adopted or developed to address each application In addition, we also discuss some research trends, such as big data issues, novel machine learning technologies, new business models, the transition of energy systems, and data privacy and security
585 citations
••
04 Aug 2017
TL;DR: A Multi-modal Factorized Bilinear (MFB) pooling approach to efficiently and effectively combine multi- modal features, which results in superior performance for VQA compared with other bilinear pooling approaches.
Abstract: Visual question answering (VQA) is challenging because it requires a simultaneous understanding of both the visual content of images and the textual content of questions. The approaches used to represent the images and questions in a fine-grained manner and questions and to fuse these multimodal features play key roles in performance. Bilinear pooling based models have been shown to outperform traditional linear models for VQA, but their high-dimensional representations and high computational complexity may seriously limit their applicability in practice. For multimodal feature fusion, here we develop a Multi-modal Factorized Bilinear (MFB) pooling approach to efficiently and effectively combine multi-modal features, which results in superior performance for VQA compared with other bilinear pooling approaches. For fine-grained image and question representation, we develop a ‘co-attention’ mechanism using an end-to-end deep network architecture to jointly learn both the image and question attentions. Combining the proposed MFB approach with co-attention learning in a new network architecture provides a unified model for VQA. Our experimental results demonstrate that the single MFB with co-attention model achieves new state-of-theart performance on the real-world VQA dataset. Code available at https://github.com/yuzcccc/mfb.
581 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the optimal power flow problems (OPF) were reformulated into a semidefinite programming (SDP) model and developed an algorithm of interior point method (IPM) for SDP.
576 citations
Authors
Showing all 8936 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Chao Zhang | 127 | 3119 | 84711 |
E. Magnus Ohman | 124 | 622 | 68976 |
Staffan Kjelleberg | 114 | 425 | 44414 |
Kenneth L. Davis | 113 | 622 | 61120 |
David Wilson | 102 | 757 | 49388 |
Michael Bauer | 100 | 1052 | 56841 |
David A. B. Miller | 96 | 702 | 38717 |
Ashutosh Chilkoti | 95 | 414 | 32241 |
Chi-Wang Shu | 93 | 529 | 56205 |
Gang Li | 93 | 486 | 68181 |
Tiefu Zhao | 90 | 593 | 36856 |
Juan Carlos García-Pagán | 90 | 348 | 25573 |
Denise C. Park | 88 | 267 | 33158 |
Santosh Kumar | 80 | 1196 | 29391 |
Chen Chen | 76 | 853 | 24974 |