Institution
University of Paris
Education•Paris, France•
About: University of Paris is a education organization based out in Paris, France. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 102426 authors who have published 174180 publications receiving 5041753 citations. The organization is also known as: Sorbonne.
Topics: Population, Medicine, Context (language use), Transplantation, Gene
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Humboldt University of Berlin1, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory2, University of California, Berkeley3, University of Lisbon4, DSM5, University of Paris6, Harvard University7, University of Toronto8, Hamilton College9, Carnegie Institution for Science10, American Astronomical Society11, California Institute of Technology12, Centra13, University of California, Santa Cruz14, University of Arizona15, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign16, Dublin City University17, Stockholm University18, Université Paris-Saclay19, University of Oxford20, Fermilab21, Vanderbilt University22, European Southern Observatory23, University of Barcelona24, Southwestern College25, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute26, Louisiana State University27, Western Kentucky University28, Texas A&M University29, University of Cambridge30
TL;DR: A new compilation of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), a new data set of low-redshift nearby-Hubble-flow SNe, and new analysis procedures to work with these heterogeneous compilations is presented in this article.
Abstract: We present a new compilation of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), a new data set of low-redshift nearby-Hubble-flow SNe, and new analysis procedures to work with these heterogeneous compilations This "Union" compilation of 414 SNe Ia, which reduces to 307 SNe after selection cuts, includes the recent large samples of SNe Ia from the Supernova Legacy Survey and ESSENCE Survey, the older data sets, as well as the recently extended data set of distant supernovae observed with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) A single, consistent, and blind analysis procedure is used for all the various SN Ia subsamples, and a new procedure is implemented that consistently weights the heterogeneous data sets and rejects outliers We present the latest results from this Union compilation and discuss the cosmological constraints from this new compilation and its combination with other cosmological measurements (CMB and BAO) The constraint we obtain from supernovae on the dark energy density is ΩΛ = 0713+ 0027−0029(stat)+ 0036−0039(sys) , for a flat, ΛCDM universe Assuming a constant equation of state parameter, w, the combined constraints from SNe, BAO, and CMB give w = − 0969+ 0059−0063(stat)+ 0063−0066(sys) While our results are consistent with a cosmological constant, we obtain only relatively weak constraints on a w that varies with redshift In particular, the current SN data do not yet significantly constrain w at z > 1 With the addition of our new nearby Hubble-flow SNe Ia, these resulting cosmological constraints are currently the tightest available
1,420 citations
••
University of Toronto1, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center2, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile3, Kettering University4, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai5, University of Paris6, Salk Institute for Biological Studies7, Baylor College of Medicine8, University of Cincinnati9, University of Massachusetts Medical School10
TL;DR: DNA sequence preferences for >1,000 TFs encompassing 54 different DBD classes from 131 diverse eukaryotes are determined, finding that closely related DBDs almost always have very similar DNA sequence preferences, enabling inference of motifs for ∼34% of the ∼170,000 known or predicted eUKaryotic TFs.
1,419 citations
••
TL;DR: It is reported that a mutation of a single copy of SHANK3 on chromosome 22q13 can result in language and/or social communication disorders.
Abstract: SHANK3 (also known as ProSAP2) regulates the structural organization of dendritic spines and is a binding partner of neuroligins; genes encoding neuroligins are mutated in autism and Asperger syndrome. Here, we report that a mutation of a single copy of SHANK3 on chromosome 22q13 can result in language and/or social communication disorders. These mutations concern only a small number of individuals, but they shed light on one gene dosage-sensitive synaptic pathway that is involved in autism spectrum disorders.
1,410 citations
••
TL;DR: Pulsed wave time-reversal focusing is shown using reciprocity valid in inhomogeneous medium to be optimal in the sense that it realizes the spatial-temporal matched filter to the inhomogeneity propagation transfer function between the array and the target.
Abstract: Time reversal of ultrasonic fields represents a way to focus through an inhomogeneous medium. This may be accomplished by a time-reversal mirror (TRM) made from an array of transmit-receive transducers that respond linearly and allow the incident acoustic pressure to be sampled. The pressure field is then time-reversed and re-emitted. This process can be used to focus through inhomogeneous media on a reflective target that behaves as an acoustic source after being insonified. The time-reversal approach is introduced in a discussion of the classical techniques used for focusing pulsed waves through inhomogeneous media (adaptive time-delay techniques). Pulsed wave time-reversal focusing is shown using reciprocity valid in inhomogeneous medium to be optimal in the sense that it realizes the spatial-temporal matched filter to the inhomogeneous propagation transfer function between the array and the target. The research on time-reversed wave fields has also led to the development of new concepts that are described: time-reversal cavity that extends the concept of the TRM, and iterative time-reversal processing for automatic sorting of targets according to their reflectivity and resonating of extended targets. >
1,407 citations
•
19 Apr 2008TL;DR: In this article, a weak variational evolution is proposed for 1D traction on a fiber reinforced matrix, and a variational formulation for fatigue is presented, which is based on the soft belly of Griffith's formulation.
Abstract: 1 Introduction 2 Going variational 2.1 Griffith's theory 2.2 The 1-homogeneous case - A variational equivalence 2.3 Smoothness - The soft belly of Griffith's formulation 2.4 The non 1-homogeneous case - A discrete variational evolution 2.5 Functional framework - A weak variational evolution 2.6 Cohesiveness and the variational evolution 3 Stationarity versus local or global minimality - A comparison 3.1 1d traction 3.1.1 The Griffith case - Soft device 3.1.2 The Griffith case - Hard device 3.1.3 Cohesive case - Soft device 3.1.4 Cohesive case - Hard device 3.2 A tearing experiment 4 Initiation 4.1 Initiation - The Griffith case 4.1.1 Initiation - The Griffith case - Global minimality 4.1.2 Initiation - The Griffith case - Local minimality 4.2 Initiation - The cohesive case 4.2.1 Initiation - The cohesive 1d case - Stationarity 4.2.2 Initiation - The cohesive 3d case - Stationarity 4.2.3 Initiation - The cohesive case - Global minimality 5 Irreversibility 5.1 Irreversibility - The Griffith case - Well-posedness of the variational evolution 5.1.1 Irreversibility - The Griffith case - Discrete evolution 5.1.2 Irreversibility - The Griffith case - Global minimality in the limit 5.1.3 Irreversibility - The Griffith case - Energy balance in the limit 5.1.4 Irreversibility - The Griffith case - The time-continuous evolution 5.2 Irreversibility - The cohesive case 6 Path 7 Griffith vs. Barenblatt 8 Numerics and Griffith 8.1 Numerical approximation of the energy 8.1.1 The first time step 8.1.2 Quasi-static evolution 8.2 Minimization algorithm 8.2.1 The alternate minimization algorithm 8.2.2 The backtracking algorithm 8.3 Numerical experiments 8.3.1 The 1D traction (hard device) 8.3.2 The Tearing experiment 8.3.3 Revisiting the 2D traction experiment on a fiber reinforced matrix 9 Fatigue 9.1 Peeling Evolution 9.2 The limitfatigue law when d tends to 0 9.3 A variational formulation for fatigue 9.3.1 Peeling revisited 9.3.2 Generalization Appendix Glossary References.
1,404 citations
Authors
Showing all 102613 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Guido Kroemer | 236 | 1404 | 246571 |
David H. Weinberg | 183 | 700 | 171424 |
Paul M. Thompson | 183 | 2271 | 146736 |
Chris Sander | 178 | 713 | 233287 |
Sophie Henrot-Versille | 171 | 957 | 157040 |
Richard H. Friend | 169 | 1182 | 140032 |
George P. Chrousos | 169 | 1612 | 120752 |
Mika Kivimäki | 166 | 1515 | 141468 |
Martin Karplus | 163 | 831 | 138492 |
William J. Sandborn | 162 | 1317 | 108564 |
Darien Wood | 160 | 2174 | 136596 |
Monique M.B. Breteler | 159 | 546 | 93762 |
Paul Emery | 158 | 1314 | 121293 |
Wolfgang Wagner | 156 | 2342 | 123391 |
Joao Seixas | 153 | 1538 | 115070 |