scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Prince Edward Island

EducationCharlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
About: University of Prince Edward Island is a education organization based out in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Salmo. The organization has 2284 authors who have published 4649 publications receiving 106305 citations. The organization is also known as: Prince of Wales College & Saint Dunstan's University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to sedentary behaviors.
Abstract: Background: The prominence of sedentary behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. Method: First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in sedentary behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Results: Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary behavior, sedentary behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, sedentary behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. Conclusion: It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to sedentary behaviors.

2,025 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

1,129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth: An Integration of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Sleep provide evidence-informed recommendations for a healthy day (24 h), comprising a combination of sleep, sedentary behaviours, light-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity physical activity.
Abstract: Leaders from the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology convened representatives of national organizations, content experts, methodologists, stakeholders, and end-users who followed rigorous and transparent guideline development procedures to create the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth: An Integration of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Sleep. These novel guidelines for children and youth aged 5-17 years respect the natural and intuitive integration of movement behaviours across the whole day (24-h period). The development process was guided by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument and systematic reviews of evidence informing the guidelines were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Four systematic reviews (physical activity, sedentary behaviour, sleep, integrated behaviours) examining the relationships between and among movement behaviours and several health indicators were completed and interpreted by expert consensus. Complementary compositional analyses were performed using Canadian Health Measures Survey data to examine the relationships between movement behaviours and health indicators. A stakeholder survey was employed (n = 590) and 28 focus groups/stakeholder interviews (n = 104) were completed to gather feedback on draft guidelines. Following an introductory preamble, the guidelines provide evidence-informed recommendations for a healthy day (24 h), comprising a combination of sleep, sedentary behaviours, light-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity physical activity. Proactive dissemination, promotion, implementation, and evaluation plans have been prepared in an effort to optimize uptake and activation of the new guidelines. Future research should consider the integrated relationships among movement behaviours, and similar integrated guidelines for other age groups should be developed.

1,114 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Patrick J. Keeling1, Patrick J. Keeling2, Fabien Burki1, Heather M. Wilcox3, Bassem Allam4, Eric E. Allen5, Linda A. Amaral-Zettler6, Linda A. Amaral-Zettler7, E. Virginia Armbrust8, John M. Archibald2, John M. Archibald9, Arvind K. Bharti10, Callum J. Bell10, Bank Beszteri11, Kay D. Bidle12, Connor Cameron10, Lisa Campbell13, David A. Caron14, Rose Ann Cattolico8, Jackie L. Collier4, Kathryn J. Coyne15, Simon K. Davy16, Phillipe Deschamps17, Sonya T. Dyhrman18, Bente Edvardsen19, Ruth D. Gates20, Christopher J. Gobler4, Spencer J. Greenwood21, Stephanie Guida10, Jennifer L. Jacobi10, Kjetill S. Jakobsen19, Erick R. James1, Bethany D. Jenkins22, Uwe John11, Matthew D. Johnson23, Andrew R. Juhl18, Anja Kamp24, Anja Kamp25, Laura A. Katz26, Ronald P. Kiene27, Alexander Kudryavtsev28, Alexander Kudryavtsev29, Brian S. Leander1, Senjie Lin30, Connie Lovejoy31, Denis H. Lynn32, Denis H. Lynn1, Adrian Marchetti33, George B. McManus30, Aurora M. Nedelcu34, Susanne Menden-Deuer22, Cristina Miceli35, Thomas Mock36, Marina Montresor37, Mary Ann Moran38, Shauna A. Murray39, Govind Nadathur40, Satoshi Nagai, Peter B. Ngam10, Brian Palenik5, Jan Pawlowski29, Giulio Petroni41, Gwenael Piganeau42, Matthew C. Posewitz43, Karin Rengefors44, Giovanna Romano37, Mary E. Rumpho30, Tatiana A. Rynearson22, Kelly B. Schilling10, Declan C. Schroeder, Alastair G. B. Simpson2, Alastair G. B. Simpson9, Claudio H. Slamovits2, Claudio H. Slamovits9, David Roy Smith45, G. Jason Smith46, Sarah R. Smith5, Heidi M. Sosik23, Peter Stief25, Edward C. Theriot47, Scott N. Twary48, Pooja E. Umale10, Daniel Vaulot49, Boris Wawrik50, Glen L. Wheeler51, William H. Wilson52, Yan Xu53, Adriana Zingone37, Alexandra Z. Worden3, Alexandra Z. Worden2 
University of British Columbia1, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research2, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute3, Stony Brook University4, University of California, San Diego5, Marine Biological Laboratory6, Brown University7, University of Washington8, Dalhousie University9, National Center for Genome Resources10, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research11, Rutgers University12, Texas A&M University13, University of Southern California14, University of Delaware15, Victoria University of Wellington16, University of Paris-Sud17, Columbia University18, University of Oslo19, University of Hawaii at Manoa20, University of Prince Edward Island21, University of Rhode Island22, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution23, Jacobs University Bremen24, Max Planck Society25, Smith College26, University of South Alabama27, Saint Petersburg State University28, University of Geneva29, University of Connecticut30, Laval University31, University of Guelph32, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill33, University of New Brunswick34, University of Camerino35, University of East Anglia36, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn37, University of Georgia38, University of Technology, Sydney39, University of Puerto Rico40, University of Pisa41, Centre national de la recherche scientifique42, Colorado School of Mines43, Lund University44, University of Western Ontario45, California State University46, University of Texas at Austin47, Los Alamos National Laboratory48, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University49, University of Oklahoma50, Plymouth Marine Laboratory51, Bigelow Laboratory For Ocean Sciences52, Princeton University53
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe a resource of 700 transcriptomes from marine microbial eukaryotes to help understand their role in the world's oceans and their biology, evolution, and ecology.
Abstract: Current sampling of genomic sequence data from eukaryotes is relatively poor, biased, and inadequate to address important questions about their biology, evolution, and ecology; this Community Page describes a resource of 700 transcriptomes from marine microbial eukaryotes to help understand their role in the world's oceans.

852 citations


Authors

Showing all 2312 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
James H. Brown12542372040
Kevin M. Smith114171178470
Javier Sánchez10865355257
Lyle J. Palmer9937247423
Michael J. Zaworotko9751944441
Shigeru Nagase7661722099
Herman W. Barkema7440822140
Michael Keane7143922654
John A. Downing7015327092
Ian A. Gardner6235812874
Takeshi Akasaka5744211619
Harold A. Robertson5614911972
Ian R. Dohoo522057815
Mourad E. H. Ismail5135910104
Peter G. Kevan512259293
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Université de Montréal
100.4K papers, 4M citations

88% related

University of California, Davis
180K papers, 8M citations

87% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

86% related

Michigan State University
137K papers, 5.6M citations

86% related

Ghent University
111K papers, 3.7M citations

86% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202311
202246
2021307
2020269
2019224
2018242