Institution
University of Queensland
Education•Brisbane, Queensland, Australia•
About: University of Queensland is a education organization based out in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 51138 authors who have published 155721 publications receiving 5717659 citations. The organization is also known as: UQ & The University of Queensland.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
University of London1, University of Queensland2, Nagasaki University3, RMIT University4, Harvard University5, Spanish National Research Council6, Queensland University of Technology7, Umeå University8, Yale University9, National Taiwan University10, Fudan University11, Seoul National University12, University of São Paulo13, University of Tsukuba14
TL;DR: Most of the temperature-related mortality burden was attributable to the contribution of cold, and the effect of days of extreme temperature was substantially less than that attributable to milder but non-optimum weather.
1,569 citations
Alternatives1, John Innes Centre2, University of Bonn3, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill4, University of Wisconsin-Madison5, University of Utah6, University of Southern California7, University of Edinburgh8, University of Warwick9, Harvard University10, University College Cork11, University of Queensland12, University of Hertfordshire13, University of Potsdam14, University of California, San Diego15, Goethe University Frankfurt16, University of California, San Francisco17, University of Delaware18, Uppsala University19, Medical University of Vienna20, J. Craig Venter Institute21, University of Hawaii at Manoa22, Leibniz Association23, University of Iowa24, University of Aberdeen25, Georgia Institute of Technology26, University of California, Berkeley27, University of Groningen28, Princeton University29, University of Marburg30, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign31, Saarland University32, Norwegian University of Life Sciences33, Massey University34, Toyama Prefectural University35, ETH Zurich36, University of Saskatchewan37, Rutgers University38, Scripps Research Institute39, University of Helsinki40, Texas A&M University41, National Institutes of Health42, Technical University of Berlin43, University of Otago44, University of Cambridge45, University of Alberta46, Michigan State University47, Hofstra University48
TL;DR: This review presents recommended nomenclature for the biosynthesis of ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs), a rapidly growing class of natural products.
1,560 citations
TL;DR: In this article, a review on the science of the t-m transformation in ZrO2 and its application in the modeling of transformation-toughhening behavior, while also summarizing the microstructural control needed to use the benefits in ZRO2-toughened ceramics.
Abstract: The recognition of the potential for enhanced fracture toughness that can be derived from controlled, stress-activated tetragonal (t) to monoclinic (m) transformation in ZrO2-based ceramics ushered in a new era in the development of the mechanical properties of engineering ceramics and provided a major impetus for broader-ranging research into the toughening mechanisms available to enhance the fracture properties of brittle-matrix materials. ZrO2-based systems have remained a major focal point for research as developments in understanding of the crystallography of the t→m transformation have led to more-complete descriptions of the origins of transformation toughening and definition of the features required of a transformation-toughening system. In parallel, there have been significant advances in the design and control of microstructure required to optimize mechanical properties in materials developed commercially. This review concentrates on the science of the t→m transformation in ZrO2 and its application in the modeling of transformation-toughening behavior, while also summarizing the microstructural control needed to use the benefits in ZrO2-toughened ceramics.
1,552 citations
New York University1, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens2, University of Barcelona3, Texas Oncology4, Complutense University of Madrid5, Aix-Marseille University6, University of Toronto7, University of Oxford8, University of Queensland9, University of Colorado Denver10, Emory University11, Cross Cancer Institute12, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse13, Georgetown University14, University of Sydney15, University of Washington16, University of Paris17, Nagoya University18, Seoul National University19, Bristol-Myers Squibb20, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust21
TL;DR: Among patients undergoing resection of stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV melanoma, adjuvant therapy with nivolumab resulted in significantly longer recurrence‐free survival and a lower rate of grade 3 or 4 adverse events than adjuant therapy with ipilimumab.
Abstract: BackgroundNivolumab and ipilimumab are immune checkpoint inhibitors that have been approved for the treatment of advanced melanoma. In the United States, ipilimumab has also been approved as adjuvant therapy for melanoma on the basis of recurrence-free and overall survival rates that were higher than those with placebo in a phase 3 trial. We wanted to determine the efficacy of nivolumab versus ipilimumab for adjuvant therapy in patients with resected advanced melanoma. MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 906 patients (≥15 years of age) who were undergoing complete resection of stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV melanoma to receive an intravenous infusion of either nivolumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks (453 patients) or ipilimumab at a dose of 10 mg per kilogram every 3 weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks (453 patients). The patients were treated for a period of up to 1 year or until disease recurrence, a report of unacceptable toxic ef...
1,549 citations
TL;DR: In this article, a route for the controlled synthesis of mesoporous polymer nanospheres, which can be further converted into carbon nanosphere through carbonization, is presented.
Abstract: The controlled synthesis of monodisperse nanospheres faces a number of difficulties, such as extensive crosslinking during hydrothermal processes. Here, the authors show a route for the controlled synthesis of mesoporous polymer nanospheres, which can be further converted into carbon nanospheres through carbonization.
1,542 citations
Authors
Showing all 52145 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graham A. Colditz | 261 | 1542 | 256034 |
| George Davey Smith | 224 | 2540 | 248373 |
| David J. Hunter | 213 | 1836 | 207050 |
| Daniel Levy | 212 | 933 | 194778 |
| Christopher J L Murray | 209 | 754 | 310329 |
| Matthew Meyerson | 194 | 553 | 243726 |
| Luigi Ferrucci | 193 | 1601 | 181199 |
| Nicholas G. Martin | 192 | 1770 | 161952 |
| Paul M. Thompson | 183 | 2271 | 146736 |
| Jie Zhang | 178 | 4857 | 221720 |
| Alan D. Lopez | 172 | 863 | 259291 |
| Ian J. Deary | 166 | 1795 | 114161 |
| Steven N. Blair | 165 | 879 | 132929 |
| Carlos Bustamante | 161 | 770 | 106053 |
| David W. Johnson | 160 | 2714 | 140778 |