scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Rochester

EducationRochester, New York, United States
About: University of Rochester is a education organization based out in Rochester, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Laser. The organization has 63915 authors who have published 112762 publications receiving 5484122 citations. The organization is also known as: Rochester University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Nine areas for improvement in measuring patient-centered communication are proposed: developing theory-based operational definitions of PCC, clarifying what is being measured, validating of instruments, and examining pathways and mediators of links between PCC and outcomes.

1,073 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although rituximab therapy led to more responders and greater reductions in anti-dsDNA and C3/C4 levels, it did not improve clinical outcomes after 1 year of treatment.
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial in patients with lupus nephritis treated concomitantly with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids. Methods Patients (n = 144) with class III or class IV lupus nephritis were randomized 1:1 to receive rituximab (1,000 mg) or placebo on days 1, 15, 168, and 182. The primary end point was renal response status at week 52. Results Rituximab depleted peripheral CD19+ B cells in 71 of 72 patients. The overall (complete and partial) renal response rates were 45.8% among the 72 patients receiving placebo and 56.9% among the 72 patients receiving rituximab (P = 0.18); partial responses accounted for most of the difference. The primary end point (superior response rate with rituximab) was not achieved. Eight placebo-treated patients and no rituximab-treated patients required cyclophosphamide rescue therapy through week 52. Statistically significant improvements in serum complement C3, C4, and anti–double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) levels were observed among patients treated with rituximab. In both treatment groups, a reduction in anti-dsDNA levels greater than the median reduction was associated with reduced proteinuria. The rates of serious adverse events, including infections, were similar in both groups. Neutropenia, leukopenia, and hypotension occurred more frequently in the rituximab group. Conclusion Although rituximab therapy led to more responders and greater reductions in anti-dsDNA and C3/C4 levels, it did not improve clinical outcomes after 1 year of treatment. The combination of rituximab with MMF and corticosteroids did not result in any new or unexpected safety signals.

1,073 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider the problem of a price-setting monopolistic marketmaker in a dealership market where the stochastic demand and supply are depicted by price-dependent Poisson processes.

1,070 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
13 Jul 2003
TL;DR: A new form of software transactional memory designed to support dynamic-sized data structures, and a novel non-blocking implementation of this STM that uses modular contention managers to ensure progress in practice.
Abstract: We propose a new form of software transactional memory (STM) designed to support dynamic-sized data structures, and we describe a novel non-blocking implementation. The non-blocking property we consider is obstruction-freedom. Obstruction-freedom is weaker than lock-freedom; as a result, it admits substantially simpler and more efficient implementations. A novel feature of our obstruction-free STM implementation is its use of modular contention managers to ensure progress in practice. We illustrate the utility of our dynamic STM with a straightforward implementation of an obstruction-free red-black tree, thereby demonstrating a sophisticated non-blocking dynamic data structure that would be difficult to implement by other means. We also present the results of simple preliminary performance experiments that demonstrate that an "early release" feature of our STM is useful for reducing contention, and that our STM lends itself to the effective use of modular contention managers.

1,068 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An overview for the new classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions is presented, along with a condensed scheme for each of four workgroup sections, but readers are directed to the pertinent consensus reports and review papers for a thorough discussion of the rationale, criteria, and interpretation of the proposed classification.
Abstract: A classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions is necessary for clinicians to properly diagnose and treat patients as well as for scientists to investigate etiology, pathogenesis, natural history, and treatment of the diseases and conditions. This paper summarizes the proceedings of the World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions. The workshop was co-sponsored by the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) and the European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) and included expert participants from all over the world. Planning for the conference, which was held in Chicago on November 9 to 11, 2017, began in early 2015. An organizing committee from the AAP and EFP commissioned 19 review papers and four consensus reports covering relevant areas in periodontology and implant dentistry. The authors were charged with updating the 1999 classification of periodontal diseases and conditions and developing a similar scheme for peri-implant diseases and conditions. Reviewers and workgroups were also asked to establish pertinent case definitions and to provide diagnostic criteria to aid clinicians in the use of the new classification. All findings and recommendations of the workshop were agreed to by consensus. This introductory paper presents an overview for the new classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions, along with a condensed scheme for each of four workgroup sections, but readers are directed to the pertinent consensus reports and review papers for a thorough discussion of the rationale, criteria, and interpretation of the proposed classification. Changes to the 1999 classification are highlighted and discussed. Although the intent of the workshop was to base classification on the strongest available scientific evidence, lower level evidence and expert opinion were inevitably used whenever sufficient research data were unavailable. The scope of this workshop was to align and update the classification scheme to the current understanding of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. This introductory overview presents the schematic tables for the new classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions and briefly highlights changes made to the 1999 classification. It cannot present the wealth of information included in the reviews, case definition papers, and consensus reports that has guided the development of the new classification, and reference to the consensus and case definition papers is necessary to provide a thorough understanding of its use for either case management or scientific investigation. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that the reader use this overview as an introduction to these subjects. Accessing this publication online will allow the reader to use the links in this overview and the tables to view the source papers (Table 1).

1,066 citations


Authors

Showing all 64186 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Eugene Braunwald2301711264576
Cyrus Cooper2041869206782
Eric J. Topol1931373151025
Dennis W. Dickson1911243148488
Scott M. Grundy187841231821
John C. Morris1831441168413
Ronald C. Petersen1781091153067
David R. Williams1782034138789
John Hardy1771178171694
Russel J. Reiter1691646121010
Michael Snyder169840130225
Jiawei Han1681233143427
Gang Chen1673372149819
Marc A. Pfeffer166765133043
Salvador Moncada164495138030
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

97% related

University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

97% related

Stanford University
320.3K papers, 21.8M citations

97% related

Harvard University
530.3K papers, 38.1M citations

97% related

Johns Hopkins University
249.2K papers, 14M citations

97% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023101
2022383
20213,841
20203,895
20193,699
20183,541