Institution
University of Salford
Education•Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom•
About: University of Salford is a education organization based out in Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 13049 authors who have published 22957 publications receiving 537330 citations. The organization is also known as: University of Salford Manchester & The University of Salford Manchester.
Topics: Population, Context (language use), Health care, Thin film, Ion
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: In this article, a comparative analysis of British and American parties and candidate election campaigning on the World Wide Web during the Presidential and General Elections of 2000 and 2001, is presented, with a focus on the United Kingdom.
Abstract: This article is a comparative analysis of British and American parties and candidate election campaigning on the World Wide Web during the Presidential and General Elections of 2000 and 2001, respe...
203 citations
TL;DR: A new BIM Oriented Modeling methodology is presented resulting in the definition of a new B IM based model (BO-IDM) dedicated for facilitating indoor navigation that provides highly detailed semantic information for indoor navigation.
202 citations
TL;DR: This review assesses the impact of 13 of the hydatid control programmes implemented, since the first was introduced in Iceland in 1863, and concludes that two countries, Iceland and New Zealand, and one island-state, Tasmania, had already declared that hyd atid disease had been eliminated from their territories.
Abstract: Echinococcosis/hydatidosis, caused by Echinococcus granulosus, is a chronic and debilitating zoonotic larval cestode infection in humans, which is principally transmitted between dogs and domestic livestock, particularly sheep Human hydatid disease occurs in almost all pastoral communities and rangeland areas of the underdeveloped and developed world Control programmes against hydatidosis have been implemented in several endemic countries, states, provinces, districts or regions to reduce or eliminate cystic echinococcosis (CE) as a public health problem This review assesses the impact of 13 of the hydatid control programmes implemented, since the first was introduced in Iceland in 1863 Five island-based control programmes (Iceland, New Zealand, Tasmania, Falklands and Cyprus) resulted, over various intervention periods (from 50 years), in successful control of transmission as evidenced by major reduction in incidence rates of human CE, and prevalence levels in sheep and dogs By 2002, two countries, Iceland and New Zealand, and one island-state, Tasmania, had already declared that hydatid disease had been eliminated from their territories Other hydatid programmes implemented in South America (Argentina, Chile, Uruguay), in Europe (mid-Wales, Sardinia) and in East Africa (northwest Kenya), showed varying degrees of success, but some were considered as having failed Reasons for the eventual success of certain hydatid control programmes and the problems encountered in others are analysed and discussed, and recommendations for likely optimal approaches considered The application of new control tools, including use of a hydatid vaccine, are also considered
201 citations
Institute of Cancer Research1, University of Salford2, Cardiff University3, Copenhagen University Hospital4, University Health Network5, St James's University Hospital6, Queen's University7, University College London8, Université de Montréal9, University of Wolverhampton10, East Kent Hospitals University Nhs Foundation Trust11, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust12, Royal Surrey County Hospital13, Southampton General Hospital14, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust15, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust16, Maidstone Hospital17, Guy's Hospital18, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust19, Northwood University20, Hillingdon Hospital21, Mount Vernon Hospital22, University of Hull23
TL;DR: The initial results do not support routine administration of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy, and an observation policy with salvage radiotherapy for PSA biochemical progression should be the current standard after radical Prostate cancer.
200 citations
TL;DR: The value of including in-depth, qualitative validation techniques in the development and testing of surveys used to collect subjective assessments of health is clearly demonstrated by the findings of the study.
200 citations
Authors
Showing all 13134 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hongjie Dai | 197 | 570 | 182579 |
| Michael P. Lisanti | 151 | 631 | 85150 |
| Matthew Jones | 125 | 1161 | 96909 |
| David W. Denning | 113 | 736 | 66604 |
| Wayne Hall | 111 | 1260 | 75606 |
| Richard Gray | 109 | 808 | 78580 |
| Christopher E.M. Griffiths | 108 | 671 | 47675 |
| Thomas P. Davis | 107 | 724 | 41495 |
| Nicholas Tarrier | 92 | 326 | 25881 |
| David M. A. Mann | 88 | 338 | 43292 |
| Ajith Abraham | 86 | 1113 | 31834 |
| Federica Sotgia | 85 | 247 | 28751 |
| Mike Hulme | 84 | 300 | 35436 |
| Robert N. Foley | 84 | 260 | 31580 |
| Richard Baker | 83 | 514 | 22970 |