Institution
University of South Australia
Education•Adelaide, South Australia, Australia•
About: University of South Australia is a education organization based out in Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 10086 authors who have published 32587 publications receiving 913683 citations. The organization is also known as: The University of South Australia & UniSA.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Health care, Mental health, Adsorption
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: Results indicate that, in addition to sleep length, wakefulness and work hours, workload significantly influences fatigue, which has possible implications for bio-mathematical predictions of fatigue and for fatigue management more generally.
195 citations
TL;DR: A total of 129 Pseudomonas spp. and 90 Aeromonas Spp. were isolated from nine rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) farms in Australia.
195 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored the relationship between the diversification of sources of imported oil and energy security of oil-importing countries, and explained why oil importers implement oil diversification policy, and contextualized the oil import diversification strategy in the overall energy security policy of oil importing countries.
195 citations
TL;DR: In this article, a model based on hypothesized relationships among sport involvement, place evaluations, at the level of venue and host city, and event satisfaction as antecedents of behavioral intentions was explored among a sample of people attending the 2012 London Olympic Games (n = 603).
195 citations
TL;DR: The authors share their experience of using the metrics citation analysis and journal impact factor in the preparation of an application for funding to raise awareness about potential issues in the practical application of these metrics and offer critique about and, they hope, “quality” to the writing and rhetoric concerning how to measure publication impact and quality.
Abstract: One of the challenges facing qualitative researchers in a climate in which audit culture has permeated many facets of the institutions in which they research is how to establish the impact and quality of their research. When examining track records, granting institutions place significant emphasis on publication performance. Although the quality and impact of publications have traditionally been assessed by peer review, there is currently a global trend toward the development, refinement, and increased use of quantitative metrics, particularly citation analysis and journal impact factor. In this article, the authors share their experience of using the metrics citation analysis and journal impact factor in the preparation of an application for funding. Their aim is twofold: to raise awareness about potential issues in the practical application of these metrics; and to offer critique about and, they hope, “quality” to the writing and rhetoric concerning how to measure publication impact and quality.
195 citations
Authors
Showing all 10298 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew P. McMahon | 162 | 415 | 90650 |
| Timothy P. Hughes | 145 | 831 | 91357 |
| Jeremy K. Nicholson | 141 | 773 | 80275 |
| Peng Shi | 137 | 1371 | 65195 |
| Daniel Thomas | 134 | 846 | 84224 |
| Jian Li | 133 | 2863 | 87131 |
| Matthew Jones | 125 | 1161 | 96909 |
| Ulrich S. Schubert | 122 | 2229 | 85604 |
| Elaine Holmes | 119 | 560 | 58975 |
| Arne Astrup | 114 | 866 | 68877 |
| Richard Gray | 109 | 808 | 78580 |
| John B. Furness | 103 | 597 | 37668 |
| Thomas J. Jentsch | 101 | 238 | 32810 |
| Ben W.J. Mol | 101 | 1485 | 47733 |
| John C. Lindon | 99 | 488 | 44063 |