Institution
University of South Australia
Education•Adelaide, South Australia, Australia•
About: University of South Australia is a education organization based out in Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 10086 authors who have published 32587 publications receiving 913683 citations. The organization is also known as: The University of South Australia & UniSA.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Health care, Mental health, Adsorption
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
19 Apr 2018TL;DR: This work investigates precise, multimodal selection techniques using head motion and eye gaze for augmented reality applications, including compact menus with deep structure, and a proof-of-concept method for on-line correction of calibration drift.
Abstract: Head and eye movement can be leveraged to improve the user's interaction repertoire for wearable displays. Head movements are deliberate and accurate, and provide the current state-of-the-art pointing technique. Eye gaze can potentially be faster and more ergonomic, but suffers from low accuracy due to calibration errors and drift of wearable eye-tracking sensors. This work investigates precise, multimodal selection techniques using head motion and eye gaze. A comparison of speed and pointing accuracy reveals the relative merits of each method, including the achievable target size for robust selection. We demonstrate and discuss example applications for augmented reality, including compact menus with deep structure, and a proof-of-concept method for on-line correction of calibration drift.
189 citations
••
TL;DR: Estimating post-stroke fatigue prevalence and identifying the contributing factors to fatigue confirm that fatigue is a widespread issue for stroke survivors, although it may be less prevalent in Asia.
Abstract: BackgroundFatigue is a common and debilitating symptom after stroke. The last decade has seen rapid expansion of the research literature on post-stroke fatigue, but prevalence remains unclear.AimsTo estimate post-stroke fatigue prevalence and to identify the contributing factors to fatigue, by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.Summary of reviewWe included all studies of adult stroke survivors that used a recognized assessment scale for fatigue (search date September 2014). Two reviewers independently reviewed all full texts for inclusion. Data were extracted by one reviewer and independently cross-checked by a second. Risk of bias was evaluated using a critical appraisal tool. From an overall yield of 921 studies, 101 full text papers were screened, and 49 of these met inclusion criteria. The most widely used measure of fatigue was the Fatigue Severity Scale (n = 24 studies). Prevalence estimates at a cut-off score of > or ≥ 4 were available for 22 of these 24 studies (total n = 3491), and ...
189 citations
••
TL;DR: Figtree Place as mentioned in this paper is a water sensitive urban redevelopment consisting of 27 residential units located in Hamilton, an inner suburb of Newcastle, NSW, Australia, which uses rainwater tanks, infiltration trenches and a central basin where cleansed stormwater enters the unconfined aquifer for water retention and retrieval.
189 citations
••
University of Sydney1, University of South Australia2, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital3, University of Western Australia4, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital5, Curtin University6, Austin Hospital7, University of Newcastle8, Flinders University9, Repatriation General Hospital10, RMIT University11, Shoalhaven District Memorial Hospital12, Royal Hobart Hospital13, University of Tasmania14, Hobart Corporation15, Royal North Shore Hospital16, St. Vincent's Health System17, Royal Melbourne Hospital18, University of Melbourne19, Northern Health20, La Trobe University21, Concord Repatriation General Hospital22, Royal Adelaide Hospital23, Monash University24, Westmead Hospital25, Griffith University26
TL;DR: The aim of the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Guidelines (Guidelines) is to provide evidence‐based recommendations for the practice of pulmonary rehabilitation specific to Australian and New Zealand healthcare contexts.
Abstract: Background and objective
The aim of the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Guidelines (Guidelines) is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the practice of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) specific to Australian and New Zealand healthcare contexts.
Methods
The Guideline methodology adhered to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II criteria. Nine key questions were constructed in accordance with the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) format and reviewed by a COPD consumer group for appropriateness. Systematic reviews were undertaken for each question and recommendations made with the strength of each recommendation based on the GRADE (Gradings of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. The Guidelines were externally reviewed by a panel of experts.
Results
The Guideline panel recommended that patients with mild-to-severe COPD should undergo PR to improve quality of life and exercise capacity and to reduce hospital admissions; that PR could be offered in hospital gyms, community centres or at home and could be provided irrespective of the availability of a structured education programme; that PR should be offered to patients with bronchiectasis, interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension, with the latter in specialized centres. The Guideline panel was unable to make recommendations relating to PR programme length beyond 8 weeks, the optimal model for maintenance after PR, or the use of supplemental oxygen during exercise training. The strength of each recommendation and the quality of the evidence are presented in the summary.
Conclusion
The Australian and New Zealand Pulmonary Rehabilitation Guidelines present an evaluation of the evidence for nine PICO questions, with recommendations to provide guidance for clinicians and policymakers.
189 citations
••
TL;DR: Brand saliency is defined as the brand's propensity to be noticed or come to mind in buying situations as mentioned in this paper, which is a measure that reflects the quantity and quality of the network of memory structures buyers hold about the brands.
Abstract: Historically, brand salience has been considered synonymous with the brand being ‘top of mind’ (mentioned first) when the product category is used to cue retrieval from memory. In this article we argue that this conceptualization (and associated measure) is too narrow. We show that there is value in distinguishing salience from the concepts of awareness and attitude by conceptualizing brand salience as the brand’s propensity to be noticed or come to mind in buying situations. Brand salience reflects the quantity and quality of the network of memory structures buyers’ hold about the brands. This article offers guidelines to facilitate research on the role of brand salience in brand choice and buyer behaviour that are an important progression from the evaluation (attitude) focus of contemporary marketing theory.
189 citations
Authors
Showing all 10298 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Andrew P. McMahon | 162 | 415 | 90650 |
Timothy P. Hughes | 145 | 831 | 91357 |
Jeremy K. Nicholson | 141 | 773 | 80275 |
Peng Shi | 137 | 1371 | 65195 |
Daniel Thomas | 134 | 846 | 84224 |
Jian Li | 133 | 2863 | 87131 |
Matthew Jones | 125 | 1161 | 96909 |
Ulrich S. Schubert | 122 | 2229 | 85604 |
Elaine Holmes | 119 | 560 | 58975 |
Arne Astrup | 114 | 866 | 68877 |
Richard Gray | 109 | 808 | 78580 |
John B. Furness | 103 | 597 | 37668 |
Thomas J. Jentsch | 101 | 238 | 32810 |
Ben W.J. Mol | 101 | 1485 | 47733 |
John C. Lindon | 99 | 488 | 44063 |