University of Southern Denmark

About: University of Southern Denmark is a education organization based out in Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Randomized controlled trial. The organization has 11928 authors who have published 37918 publications receiving 1258559 citations. The organization is also known as: SDU.

Good semen quality and life expectancy: a cohort study of 43,277 men.

Abstract: Fertility status may predict later mortality, but no studies have examined the effect of semen quality on subsequent mortality. Men referred to the Copenhagen Sperm Analysis Laboratory by general practitioners and urologists from 1963 to 2001 were, through a unique personal identification number, linked to the Danish central registers that hold information on all cases of cancer, causes of death, and number of children in the Danish population. The men were followed until December 31, 2001, death, or censoring, whichever occurred first, and the total mortality and cause-specific mortality of the cohort were compared with those of all age-standardized Danish men or according to semen characteristics. Among 43,277 men without azospermia referred for infertility problems, mortality decreased as the sperm concentration increased up to a threshold of 40 million/mL. As the percentages of motile and morphologically normal spermatozoa and semen volume increased, mortality decreased in a dose-response manner (P(trend) < 0.05). The decrease in mortality among men with good semen quality was due to a decrease in a wide range of diseases and was found among men both with and without children; therefore, the decrease in mortality could not be attributed solely to lifestyle and/or social factors. Semen quality may therefore be a fundamental biomarker of overall male health.

Comparison of long‐term drug survival and safety of biologic agents in patients with psoriasis vulgaris

Abstract: SummaryBackground Drug survival (time to drug discontinuation) has recently emerged as an important parameter reflecting the long-term therapeutic performance in a real-life setting. Biologic drug survival in psoriasis is mainly limited by a gradual loss of efficacy over time. Previous studies have been limited by small patient population size and short observation times and yielded discrepant survival times for different biologics. Objectives To calculate the long-term drug survival for adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab in a large cohort of real-life patients with psoriasis vulgaris and to analyse the factors that influence drug survival. Patients and methods Data were extracted from the prospective registry DERMBIO covering all patients with psoriasis vulgaris treated with biologic agents in the academic centres in Denmark. Drug survival was analysed using the Kaplan–Meier method. The influence of different covariates on drug survival was analysed by Cox regression. Results Included in the analysis were 1867 treatment series (adalimumab n = 774, etanercept n = 449, infliximab n = 253, ustekinumab n = 391) administered in 1277 patients for up to 10 years. Drug survival was significantly longer for ustekinumab than for anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents (P < 0·001). Etanercept had the shortest survival time [median survival 30 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 25·1–34·9] whereas adalimumab and infliximab had comparable survival rates (59 months, 95% CI 45·6–72·4; 44 months, 95% CI 33–54·9, respectively). Survival was longer in men [odds ratio (OR) 1·51, 95% CI 1·31–1·74 vs. women] and in patients who had not previously received any biologic agent (OR 1·24, 95% CI 1·05–1·46). Loss of efficacy accounted for 67% of all drug discontinuations. Conclusions Ustekinumab has a significantly longer drug survival than the anti-TNF-α agents. Switching from one biologic to another is associated with an impairment of drug survival. Preventing loss of efficacy is a major area of medical need in the biologic therapy of psoriasis and the strategies that improve drug survival should be further investigated.

A population-based study of neuromyelitis optica in Caucasians

Abstract: Background: Epidemiologic studies have suggested different prevalence of neuromyelitis optica (NMO) in different ethnic groups. However, data on the incidence and prevalence of NMO in Caucasians are scarce. Objective: To estimate the incidence and prevalence of NMO in a predominantly Caucasian population based on the Wingerchuk 2006 criteria. Methods: The study was a population-based retrospective case series with longitudinal follow-up. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), optic neuritis (ON), acute transverse myelitis (TM), and NMO from the 4 neurology and 3 ophthalmology departments in the Region of Southern Denmark having been diagnosed between 1998 and 2008 were investigated. Patients were included based on 1) episodes of ON or TM and 2) an initial brain MRI not diagnostic for MS. An immunofluorescence assay was used to determine aquaporin-4 (AQP-4) antibodies. Results: A total of 477 patients with MS, TM, or ON were evaluated: 163 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 42 (26%) qualified for the diagnosis of NMO, 26 (62.0%) of these were AQP4 antibody positive. All except one were Caucasian, the female:male ratio was 2.8:1, and mean age at onset was 35.6 years (range 15–64 years). The clinical presentation was heterogeneous including TM, longitudinally extensive TM, ON, and brainstem syndromes. The yearly incidence rate of NMO in the population was estimated to be 0.4 per 10 5 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.54) and the prevalence was 4.4 per 10 5 (95% CI 3.1–5.7). Conclusions: Despite being a rare disease, NMO is more common in a Caucasian population than earlier believed.

Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.

Abstract: The International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Working Group have evaluated and recommended best practices in the selection, administration, and interpretation of PROMs for hip and knee arthroplasty registries. The 2 generic PROMs in common use are the Short Form health surveys (SF-36 or SF-12) and EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D). The Working Group recommends that registries should choose specific PROMs that have been appropriately developed with good measurement properties for arthroplasty patients. The Working Group recommend the use of a 1-item pain question ("During the past 4 weeks, how would you describe the pain you usually have in your [right/left] [hip/knee]?"; response: none, very mild, mild, moderate, or severe) and a single-item satisfaction outcome ("How satisfied are you with your [right/left] [hip/knee] replacement?"; response: very unsatisfied, dissatisfied, neutral, satisfied, or very satisfied). Survey logistics include patient instructions, paper- and electronic-based data collection, reminders for follow-up, centralized as opposed to hospital-based follow-up, sample size, patient- or joint-specific evaluation, collection intervals, frequency of response, missing values, and factors in establishing a PROMs registry program. The Working Group recommends including age, sex, diagnosis at joint, general health status preoperatively, and joint pain and function score in case-mix adjustment models. Interpretation and statistical analysis should consider the absolute level of pain, function, and general health status as well as improvement, missing data, approaches to analysis and case-mix adjustment, minimal clinically important difference, and minimal detectable change. The Working Group recommends data collection immediately before and 1 year after surgery, a threshold of 60% for acceptable frequency of response, documentation of non-responders, and documentation of incomplete or missing data.