scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Texas at Arlington

EducationArlington, Texas, United States
About: University of Texas at Arlington is a education organization based out in Arlington, Texas, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Large Hadron Collider. The organization has 11758 authors who have published 28598 publications receiving 801626 citations. The organization is also known as: UT Arlington & University of Texas-Arlington.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a one-day-ahead PV power output forecasting model for a single station is derived based on the weather forecasting data, actual historical power output data, and the principle of SVM.
Abstract: Due to the growing demand on renewable energy, photovoltaic (PV) generation systems have increased considerably in recent years. However, the power output of PV systems is affected by different weather conditions. Accurate forecasting of PV power output is important for system reliability and promoting large-scale PV deployment. This paper proposes algorithms to forecast power output of PV systems based upon weather classification and support vector machines (SVM). In the process, the weather conditions are divided into four types which are clear sky, cloudy day, foggy day, and rainy day. In this paper, a one-day-ahead PV power output forecasting model for a single station is derived based on the weather forecasting data, actual historical power output data, and the principle of SVM. After applying it into a PV station in China (the capability is 20 kW), results show the proposed forecasting model for grid-connected PV systems is effective and promising.

547 citations

Proceedings Article
12 Feb 2016
TL;DR: This work develops two versions of the Constrained Laplacian Rank (CLR) method, based upon the L1-norm and the L2-norm, which yield two new graph-based clustering objectives and derives optimization algorithms to solve them.
Abstract: Graph-based clustering methods perform clustering on a fixed input data graph. If this initial construction is of low quality then the resulting clustering may also be of low quality. Moreover, existing graph-based clustering methods require post-processing on the data graph to extract the clustering indicators. We address both of these drawbacks by allowing the data graph itself to be adjusted as part of the clustering procedure. In particular, our Constrained Laplacian Rank (CLR) method learns a graph with exactly k connected components (where k is the number of clusters). We develop two versions of this method, based upon the L1-norm and the L2-norm, which yield two new graph-based clustering objectives. We derive optimization algorithms to solve these objectives. Experimental results on synthetic datasets and real-world benchmark datasets exhibit the effectiveness of this new graph-based clustering method.

546 citations

Book
01 Jan 2004
TL;DR: This book discusses smart environment technologies, applications, and how to design for the Human Experience in Smart Environments and address privacy, security, and Trust issues in smart environments.
Abstract: ContributorsForeword by (Howard E Shrobe)AcknowledgementsPART 1: INTRODUCTION1 Overview (D Cook & S Das)PART 2: TECHNOLOGIES FOR SMART ENVIRONMENTS2 Wireless Sensor Networks (F Lewis)3 Power Line Communication Technologies (H Latchman & A Mundi)4 Wireless Communications and Pervasive Technology (M Conti)5 Middleware (G Youngblood)6 Home Networking and Appliances (D Marples & S Moyer)PART 3: ALGORITHMS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SMART ENVIRONMENTS7 Designing for the Human Experience in Smart Environments (G Abowd & E Mynatt)8 Prediction Algorithms foor Smart Environments (D Cook)9 Location Estimation (Determination and Prediction) Techniques in Smart Environments (A Misra & S Das)10 Automated Decision Making (M Huber)11 Privacy, Security, and Trust Issues in Smart Environments (P Nixon, et al)PART 4: APPLICATIONS12 Lessons from an Adaptive Home (M Mozer)13 Smart Rooms (A Chen, et al)14 Smart Offices (C Gal)15 Perceptual Environments (A Pentland)16 Assistive Environments for Individuals with Special Needs (A Helal, et al)PART 5: CONCLUSIONS17 Ongoing Challenges and Future Directions (S Das & D Cook)Index

546 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
05 Jan 2016-JAMA
TL;DR: Among obese older patients with clinically stable HFPEF, caloric restriction or aerobic exercise training increased peak V̇O2, and the effects may be additive, and neither intervention had a significant effect on quality of life as measured by the MLHF Questionnaire.
Abstract: Importance More than 80% of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), the most common form of heart failure among older persons, are overweight or obese. Exercise intolerance is the primary symptom of chronic HFPEF and a major determinant of reduced quality of life (QOL). Objective To determine whether caloric restriction (diet) or aerobic exercise training (exercise) improves exercise capacity and QOL in obese older patients with HFPEF. Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized, attention-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial conducted from February 2009 through November 2014 in an urban academic medical center. Of 577 initially screened participants, 100 older obese participants (mean [SD]: age, 67 years [5]; body mass index, 39.3 [5.6]) with chronic, stable HFPEF were enrolled (366 excluded by inclusion and exclusion criteria, 31 for other reasons, and 80 declined participation). Interventions Twenty weeks of diet, exercise, or both; attention control consisted of telephone calls every 2 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Exercise capacity measured as peak oxygen consumption (Vo 2 , mL/kg/min; co–primary outcome) and QOL measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire (score range: 0–105, higher scores indicate worse heart failure–related QOL; co–primary outcome). Results Of the 100 enrolled participants, 26 participants were randomized to exercise; 24 to diet; 25 to exercise + diet; 25 to control. Of these, 92 participants completed the trial. Exercise attendance was 84% (SD, 14%) and diet adherence was 99% (SD, 1%). By main effects analysis, peak Vo 2 was increased significantly by both interventions: exercise, 1.2 mL/kg body mass/min (95% CI, 0.7 to 1.7), P P 2 (joint effect, 2.5 mL/kg/min). There was no statistically significant change in MLHF total score with exercise and with diet (main effect: exercise, −1 unit [95% CI, −8 to 5], P = .70; diet, −6 units [95% CI, −12 to 1], P = .08). The change in peak Vo 2 was positively correlated with the change in percent lean body mass ( r = 0.32; P = .003) and the change in thigh muscle:intermuscular fat ratio ( r = 0.27; P = .02). There were no study-related serious adverse events. Body weight decreased by 7% (7 kg [SD, 1]) in the diet group, 3% (4 kg [SD, 1]) in the exercise group, 10% (11 kg [SD, 1] in the exercise + diet group, and 1% (1 kg [SD, 1]) in the control group. Conclusions and Relevance Among obese older patients with clinically stable HFPEF, caloric restriction or aerobic exercise training increased peak Vo 2 , and the effects may be additive. Neither intervention had a significant effect on quality of life as measured by the MLHF Questionnaire. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT00959660

545 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Owing to their unique optical property, small size, low cost of production and low cytotoxicity, CuS nanoparticles are promising new nanomaterials for cancer photothermal ablation therapy.

542 citations


Authors

Showing all 11918 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Zhong Lin Wang2452529259003
Hyun-Chul Kim1764076183227
David H. Adams1551613117783
Andrew White1491494113874
Kaushik De1391625102058
Steven F. Maier13458860382
Andrew Brandt132124694676
Amir Farbin131112583388
Evangelos Gazis131114784159
Lee Sawyer130134088419
Fernando Barreiro130108283413
Stavros Maltezos12994379654
Elizabeth Gallas129115785027
Francois Vazeille12995279800
Sotirios Vlachos12878977317
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Georgia Institute of Technology
119K papers, 4.6M citations

95% related

University of Maryland, College Park
155.9K papers, 7.2M citations

95% related

Pennsylvania State University
196.8K papers, 8.3M citations

95% related

University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

94% related

University of Texas at Austin
206.2K papers, 9M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202353
2022243
20211,721
20201,664
20191,493
20181,462