scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Texas at Austin

EducationAustin, Texas, United States
About: University of Texas at Austin is a education organization based out in Austin, Texas, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 94352 authors who have published 206297 publications receiving 9070052 citations. The organization is also known as: UT-Austin & UT Austin.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The research discussed here is based on the assumption that targets play an active role in the identity negotiation process, and suggests that perceivers and targets enter their interactions with independent and sometimes conflicting agendas that are resolved through a process of identity negotiation.
Abstract: This article traces a program of research on the interplay between social thought and social interaction. Early investigations of the impact of perceivers' expectancies on the actions of target individuals illuminated the contribution of perceivers to the identity negotiation process but overlooked the role of targets. The research discussed here is based on the assumption that targets play an active role in the identity negotiation process. Specifically, just as perceivers strive to validate their expectancies, targets seek to verify their self-views. The nature and antecedents of the processes through which people verify their self-conceptions as well as the relationship of these activities to self-concept change and self-enhancement processes are discussed. This research suggests that perceivers and targets enter their interactions with independent and sometimes conflicting agendas that are resolved through a process of identity negotiation. The identity negotiation process therefore provides a theoretical context in which the interplay between other-perception and self-perception can be understood.

1,168 citations

Posted ContentDOI
Spyridon Bakas1, Mauricio Reyes, Andras Jakab2, Stefan Bauer3  +435 moreInstitutions (111)
TL;DR: This study assesses the state-of-the-art machine learning methods used for brain tumor image analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018, and investigates the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks.
Abstract: Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by varying intensity profiles disseminated across multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans, reflecting varying biological properties. Their heterogeneous shape, extent, and location are some of the factors that make these tumors difficult to resect, and in some cases inoperable. The amount of resected tumoris a factor also considered in longitudinal scans, when evaluating the apparent tumor for potential diagnosis of progression. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that accurate segmentation of the various tumor sub-regions can offer the basis for quantitative image analysis towards prediction of patient overall survival. This study assesses thestate-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods used for brain tumor image analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018. Specifically, we focus on i) evaluating segmentations of the various glioma sub-regions in pre-operative mpMRI scans, ii) assessing potential tumor progression by virtue of longitudinal growth of tumor sub-regions, beyond use of the RECIST/RANO criteria, and iii) predicting the overall survival from pre-operative mpMRI scans of patients that underwent gross tota lresection. Finally, we investigate the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks, considering that apart from being diverse on each instance of the challenge, the multi-institutional mpMRI BraTS dataset has also been a continuously evolving/growing dataset.

1,165 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A Generalized Reduced Gradient algorithm for nonlinear programming, its implementation as a FORTRAN program for solving small to medium size problems, and some computational results are described.
Abstract: : The purpose of this paper is to describe a Generalized Reduced Gradient (GRG) algorithm for nonlinear programming, its implementation as a FORTRAN program for solving small to medium size problems, and some computational results. Our focus is more on the software implementation of the algorithm than on its mathematical properties. This is in line with the premise that robust, efficient, easy to use NLP software must be written and made accessible if nonlinear programming is to progress, both in theory and in practice.

1,165 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors studied 111 publicly traded firms that either file for bankruptcy or privately restructure their debt between 1979 and 1985 and found that corporate default leads to significant changes in the ownership of firms' residual claims and in the allocation of rights to manage corporate resources.

1,163 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article suggests an alternative mechanism for coordinating the movement of autonomous vehicles through intersections and demonstrates in simulation that this new mechanism has the potential to significantly outperform current intersection control technology--traffic lights and stop signs.
Abstract: Artificial intelligence research is ushering in a new era of sophisticated, mass-market transportation technology. While computers can already fly a passenger jet better than a trained human pilot, people are still faced with the dangerous yet tedious task of driving automobiles. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) is the field that focuses on integrating information technology with vehicles and transportation infrastructure to make transportation safer, cheaper, and more efficient. Recent advances in ITS point to a future in which vehicles themselves handle the vast majority of the driving task. Once autonomous vehicles become popular, autonomous interactions amongst multiple vehicles will be possible. Current methods of vehicle coordination, which are all designed to work with human drivers, will be outdated. The bottleneck for roadway efficiency will no longer be the drivers, but rather the mechanism by which those drivers' actions are coordinated. While open-road driving is a well-studied and more-or-less-solved problem, urban traffic scenarios, especially intersections, are much more challenging. We believe current methods for controlling traffic, specifically at intersections, will not be able to take advantage of the increased sensitivity and precision of autonomous vehicles as compared to human drivers. In this article, we suggest an alternative mechanism for coordinating the movement of autonomous vehicles through intersections. Drivers and intersections in this mechanism are treated as autonomous agents in a multiagent system. In this multiagent system, intersections use a new reservation-based approach built around a detailed communication protocol, which we also present. We demonstrate in simulation that our new mechanism has the potential to significantly outperform current intersection control technology--traffic lights and stop signs. Because our mechanism can emulate a traffic light or stop sign, it subsumes the most popular current methods of intersection control. This article also presents two extensions to the mechanism. The first extension allows the system to control human-driven vehicles in addition to autonomous vehicles. The second gives priority to emergency vehicles without significant cost to civilian vehicles. The mechanism, including both extensions, is implemented and tested in simulation, and we present experimental results that strongly attest to the efficacy of this approach.

1,163 citations


Authors

Showing all 95138 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
George M. Whitesides2401739269833
Eugene Braunwald2301711264576
Yi Chen2174342293080
Robert J. Lefkowitz214860147995
Joseph L. Goldstein207556149527
Eric N. Olson206814144586
Hagop M. Kantarjian2043708210208
Rakesh K. Jain2001467177727
Francis S. Collins196743250787
Gordon B. Mills1871273186451
Scott M. Grundy187841231821
Michael S. Brown185422123723
Eric Boerwinkle1831321170971
Aaron R. Folsom1811118134044
Jiaguo Yu178730113300
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Stanford University
320.3K papers, 21.8M citations

97% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

96% related

University of California, San Diego
204.5K papers, 12.3M citations

96% related

University of Michigan
342.3K papers, 17.6M citations

96% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023304
20221,210
202110,141
202010,331
20199,727
20188,973