University of Texas at Austin

About: University of Texas at Austin is a education organization based out in Austin, Texas, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 94352 authors who have published 206297 publications receiving 9070052 citations. The organization is also known as: UT-Austin & UT Austin.

Design Experiments in Educational Research

Abstract: In this article, the authors first indicate the range of purposes and the variety of settings in which design experiments have been conducted and then delineate five crosscutting features that collectively differentiate design experiments from other methodologies. Design experiments have both a pragmatic bent—“engineering” particular forms of learning—and a theoretical orientation—developing domain-specific theories by systematically studying those forms of learning and the means of supporting them. The authors clarify what is involved in preparing for and carrying out a design experiment, and in conducting a retrospective analysis of the extensive, longitudinal data sets generated during an experiment. Logistical issues, issues of measure, the importance of working through the data systematically, and the need to be explicit about the criteria for making inferences are discussed.

Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability

Abstract: To clarify the role of decoding in reading and reading disability, a simple model of reading is proposed, which holds that reading equals the product of decoding and comprehension. It follows that there must be three types of reading disability, resulting from an inability to decode, an inability to comprehend, or both. It is argued that the first is dyslexia, the second hyperlexia, and the third common, or garden variety, reading disability.

Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity

Abstract: It is shown that the global charges of a gauge theory may yield a nontrivial central extension of the asymptotic symmetry algebra already at the classical level. This is done by studying three dimensional gravity with a negative cosmological constant. The asymptotic symmetry group in that case is eitherR×SO(2) or the pseudo-conformal group in two dimensions, depending on the boundary conditions adopted at spatial infinity. In the latter situation, a nontrivial central charge appears in the algebra of the canonical generators, which turns out to be just the Virasoro central charge.

Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses.

Abstract: A method for treating a complex structure as an assemblage of distinct regions, or substructures, is presented. Using basic mass and stiffness matrices for the substructures, together with conditions of geometrical compatibility along substructure boundaries, the method employs two forms of generalized coordinates. Boundary generalized coordinates give displacements and rotations of points along substructure boundaries and are related to the displacement modes of the substructures known as "constraint modes." All constraint modes are generated by matrix operations from substructure input data. Substructure normal-mode generalized coordinates are related to free vibration modes of the substructures relative to completely restrained boundaries. The definition of substructure modes and the requirement of compatibility along substructure boundaries lead to coordinate transformation matrices that are employed in obtaining system mass and stiffness matrices from the mass and stiffness matrices of the substructures. Provision is made, through a RayleighRitz procedure, for reducing the total number of degrees of freedom of a structure while retaining accurate description of its dynamic behavior. Substructure boundaries may have any degree of redundancy. An example is presented giving a free vibration analysis of a structure having a highly indeterminate substructure boundary.