scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Texas Medical Branch

EducationGalveston, Texas, United States
About: University of Texas Medical Branch is a education organization based out in Galveston, Texas, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Virus. The organization has 22033 authors who have published 38268 publications receiving 1517502 citations. The organization is also known as: The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston & UTMB.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Nuno R. Faria1, Nuno R. Faria2, Raimunda do Socorro da Silva Azevedo2, Moritz U. G. Kraemer1, Renato Pereira de Souza3, Mariana Sequetin Cunha3, Sarah C. Hill1, Julien Thézé1, Michael B. Bonsall1, Thomas A. Bowden4, Ilona Rissanen4, Iray Maria Rocco3, Juliana Silva Nogueira3, Adriana Yurika Maeda3, Fernanda Giseli da Silva Vasami3, F. L. L. Macedo3, Akemi Suzuki3, Sueli Guerreiro Rodrigues2, Ana Cecília Ribeiro Cruz2, Bruno Tardeli Nunes2, Daniele Barbosa de Almeida Medeiros2, Daniela Sueli Guerreiro Rodrigues2, Alice Louize Nunes Queiroz2, Eliana Vieira Pinto da Silva2, Daniele Freitas Henriques2, Elisabeth Salbe Travassos da Rosa2, Consuelo Silva de Oliveira2, Lívia Carício Martins2, Helena Baldez Vasconcelos2, Livia Medeiros Neves Casseb2, Darlene B. Simith2, Jane P. Messina1, Leandro Abade1, José Lourenço1, Luiz Carlos Junior Alcantara5, Maricélia Maia de Lima6, Marta Giovanetti5, Simon I. Hay4, Simon I. Hay7, Rodrigo Santos de Oliveira2, Poliana da Silva Lemos2, Layanna Freitas de Oliveira2, Clayton Pereira Silva de Lima2, Sandro Patroca da Silva2, Janaina Mota de Vasconcelos2, L. C Franco2, Jedson Ferreira Cardoso2, João Lídio Silva Gonçalves Vianez-Júnior2, Daiana Mir5, Gonzalo Bello5, Edson Delatorre5, Kamran Khan8, Kamran Khan9, Marisa I Creatore8, Giovanini E. Coelho, Wanderson Kleber de Oliveira, Robert B. Tesh10, Oliver G. Pybus1, Márcio Roberto Teixeira Nunes10, Márcio Roberto Teixeira Nunes2, Pedro Fernando da Costa Vasconcelos2 
15 Apr 2016-Science
TL;DR: Results of phylogenetic and molecular clock analyses show a single introduction of ZikV into the Americas, which is estimated to have occurred between May and December 2013, more than 12 months before the detection of ZIKV in Brazil.
Abstract: Brazil has experienced an unprecedented epidemic of Zika virus (ZIKV), with ~30,000 cases reported to date. ZIKV was first detected in Brazil in May 2015, and cases of microcephaly potentially associated with ZIKV infection were identified in November 2015. We performed next-generation sequencing to generate seven Brazilian ZIKV genomes sampled from four self-limited cases, one blood donor, one fatal adult case, and one newborn with microcephaly and congenital malformations. Results of phylogenetic and molecular clock analyses show a single introduction of ZIKV into the Americas, which we estimated to have occurred between May and December 2013, more than 12 months before the detection of ZIKV in Brazil. The estimated date of origin coincides with an increase in air passengers to Brazil from ZIKV-endemic areas, as well as with reported outbreaks in the Pacific Islands. ZIKV genomes from Brazil are phylogenetically interspersed with those from other South American and Caribbean countries. Mapping mutations onto existing structural models revealed the context of viral amino acid changes present in the outbreak lineage; however, no shared amino acid changes were found among the three currently available virus genomes from microcephaly cases. Municipality-level incidence data indicate that reports of suspected microcephaly in Brazil best correlate with ZIKV incidence around week 17 of pregnancy, although this correlation does not demonstrate causation. Our genetic description and analysis of ZIKV isolates in Brazil provide a baseline for future studies of the evolution and molecular epidemiology of this emerging virus in the Americas.

921 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A multidisciplinary approach will most likely result in success in the pharmacology of zinc compounds as a promising area for translational research, and the current assumed range between safe and unsafe intakes of zinc is relatively narrow.

920 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Anterograde and retrograde transport methods were used to study the corticocortical connectivity of areas 3a, 3b, 1, 2, 5, 4 and 6 of the monkey cerebral cortex, finding possible multiple representations of the body surface in the component fields of the first somatic sensory area (SI).
Abstract: Anterograde and retrograde transport methods were used to study the corticocortical connectivity of areas 3a, 3b, 1, 2, 5, 4 and 6 of the monkey cerebral cortex. Fields were identified by cytoarchitectonic features and by thalamic connectivity in the same brains. Area 3a was identified by first recording a short latency group I afferent evoked potential. Attempts were made to analyze the data in terms of: (1) routes whereby somatic sensory input might influence the performance of motor cortex neurons; (2) possible multiple representations of the body surface in the component fields of the first somatic sensory area (SI). Apart from vertical interlaminar connections, two types of intracortical connectivity are recognized. The first, regarded as "non-specific," consists of axons spreading out in layers I, III and V-VI from all sides of an injection of isotope; these cross architectonic borders indiscrimininately. They are not unique to the regions studied. The second is formed by axons entering the white matter and re-entering other fields. In these, they terminate in layers I-IV in one or more mediolaterally oriented strips of fairly constant width (0.5--1 mm) and separated by gaps of comparable size. Though there is a broadly systematic topography in these projections, the strips are probably best regarded as representing some feature other than receptive field position. Separate representations are nevertheless implied in area 3b, in areas 1 and 2 (together), in areas 3a and 4 (together) and in area 5; with, in each case, the representations of the digits pointed at the central sulcus. Area 3b is not connected with areas 3a or 4, but projects to a combined areas 1 and 2. Area 1 is reciprocally connected with area 3a and area 2 reciprocally with area 4. The connectivity of area 3a, as conventionally identified, is such that it is probably best regarded not as an entity, but as a part of area 4. Areas identified by others as area 3a should probably be regraded as parts of area 3b. Parts of area 5 that should be more properly considered as area 2, and other parts that receive thalamic input not from the ventrobasal complex but from the lateral nuclear complex and anterior pulvinar, are also interconnected with area 4. More posterior parts of area 5 are connected with laterally placed parts of area 6. A more medial part of area 6, the supplementary motor area, occupies a pivotal position in the sensory-motor cortex, for it receives fibers from areas 3a, 4, 1, 2 and 5 (all parts), and projects back to areas 3a, 4 and 5.

919 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
22 Jan 1997-JAMA
TL;DR: There is overwhelming evidence that individuals with depression are being seriously undertreated and the cost to individuals and society of this undertreatment is substantial.
Abstract: Objective. —A consensus conference on the reasons for the undertreatment of depression was organized by the National Depressive and Manic Depressive Association (NDMDA) on January 17-18, 1996. The target audience included health policymakers, clinicians, patients and their families, and the public at large. Six key questions were addressed: (1) Is depression undertreated in the community and in the clinic? (2) What is the economic cost to society of depression? (3) What have been the efforts in the past to redress undertreatment and how successful have they been? (4) What are the reasons for the gap between our knowledge of the diagnosis and treatment of depression and actual treatment received in this country? (5) What can we do to narrow this gap? (6) What can we do immediately to narrow this gap? Participants. —Consensus panel members were drawn from psychiatry, psychology, family practice, internal medicine, managed care and public health, consumers, and the general public. The panelists listened to a set of presentations with background papers from experts on diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment, and cost of treatment. Evidence. —Experts summarized relevant data from the world scientific literature on the 6 questions posed for the conference. Consensus Process. —Panel members discussed openly all material presented to them in executive session. Selected panelists prepared first drafts of the consensus statements for each question. All of these drafts were read by all panelists and were edited and reedited until consensus was achieved. Conclusions. —There is overwhelming evidence that individuals with depression are being seriously undertreated. Safe, effective, and economical treatments are available. The cost to individuals and society of this undertreatment is substantial. Long suffering, suicide, occupational impairment, and impairment in interpersonal and family relationships exist. Efforts to redress this gap have included provider educational programs and public educational programs. Reasons for the continuing gap include patient, provider, and health care system factors. Patient-based reasons include failure to recognize the symptoms, underestimating the severity, limited access, reluctance to see a mental health care specialist due to stigma, noncompliance with treatment, and lack of health insurance. Provider factors include poor professional school education about depression, limited training in interpersonal skills, stigma, inadequate time to evaluate and treat depression, failure to consider psychotherapeutic approaches, and prescription of inadequate doses of antidepressant medication for inadequate durations. Mental health care systems create barriers to receiving optimal treatment. Strategies to narrow the gap include enhancing the role of patients and families as participants in care and advocates; developing performance standards for behavioral health care systems, including incentives for positive identification, assessment, and treatment of depression; enhancing educational programs for providers and the public; enhancing collaboration among provider subtypes (eg, primary care providers and mental health professionals); and conducting research on development and testing of new treatments for depression.

917 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that structured hepatitis C virus (HCV) genomic RNA activates interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), thereby inducing Interferon in cultured cells, and RIG-I is a pathogen receptor that regulates cellular permissiveness to HCV replication and may play a key role inInterferon-based therapies for the treatment of HCV infection.
Abstract: Virus-responsive signaling pathways that induce alpha/beta interferon production and engage intracellular immune defenses influence the outcome of many viral infections. The processes that trigger these defenses and their effect upon host permissiveness for specific viral pathogens are not well understood. We show that structured hepatitis C virus (HCV) genomic RNA activates interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), thereby inducing interferon in cultured cells. This response is absent in cells selected for permissiveness for HCV RNA replication. Studies including genetic complementation revealed that permissiveness is due to mutational inactivation of RIG-I, an interferon-inducible cellular DExD/H box RNA helicase. Its helicase domain binds HCV RNA and transduces the activation signal for IRF3 by its caspase recruiting domain homolog. RIG-I is thus a pathogen receptor that regulates cellular permissiveness to HCV replication and, as an interferon-responsive gene, may play a key role in interferon-based therapies for the treatment of HCV infection.

916 citations


Authors

Showing all 22143 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Stuart H. Orkin186715112182
Eric R. Kandel184603113560
John C. Morris1831441168413
Joseph Biederman1791012117440
Richard A. Gibbs172889249708
Timothy A. Springer167669122421
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi1661374104845
Roberto Romero1511516108321
Charles B. Nemeroff14997990426
Peter J. Schwartz147647107695
Clifford J. Woolf14150986164
Thomas J. Smith1401775113919
Edward C. Holmes13882485748
Jun Lu135152699767
Henry T. Lynch13392586270
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Baylor College of Medicine
94.8K papers, 5M citations

97% related

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
79.2K papers, 4.7M citations

97% related

University of Alabama at Birmingham
86.7K papers, 3.9M citations

97% related

National Institutes of Health
297.8K papers, 21.3M citations

97% related

University of California, San Francisco
186.2K papers, 12M citations

97% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202330
2022196
20211,617
20201,487
20191,298
20181,152