scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Tübingen

EducationTübingen, Germany
About: University of Tübingen is a education organization based out in Tübingen, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 40555 authors who have published 84108 publications receiving 3015320 citations. The organization is also known as: Eberhard Karls University & Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Susanne Krege, Jörg Beyer, Rainer Souchon1, Peter Albers, Walter Albrecht, Ferran Algaba, Michael Bamberg2, István Bodrogi, Carsten Bokemeyer3, Eva Cavallin-Ståhl4, Johannes Classen, C Clemm, Gabriella Cohn-Cedermark5, Stéphane Culine, Gedske Daugaard6, Pieter H.M. De Mulder7, Maria De Santis, Maike de Wit, Ronald de Wit8, H. G. Derigs, Klaus Peter Dieckmann, Annette Dieing9, Jean Pierre Droz, Martin Fenner, Karim Fizazi10, Aude Flechon, Sophie D. Fosså, Xavier Garcia del Muro, Thomas Gauler11, Lajos Géczi, Arthur Gerl, Jose Ramon Germa-Lluch, Silke Gillessen2, Jörg T. Hartmann12, Michael Hartmann, Axel Heidenreich, Wolfgang Hoeltl, Alan Horwich13, Robert Huddart13, Michael Jewett, Johnathan Joffe, William G. Jones14, László Kisbenedek, Olbjørn Klepp, S. Kliesch15, Kai Uwe Koehrmann16, Christian K. Kollmannsberger17, Markus A. Kuczyk18, Pilar Laguna, Oscar Leiva Galvis, Volker Loy19, Malcolm David Mason12, Graham M. Mead20, Rolf Mueller, Craig R. Nichols21, Nicola Nicolai, Tim Oliver22, D. Ondruš, Gosse O N Oosterhof, Luis Paz Ares, Giorgio Pizzocaro21, Jörg Pont, Tobias Pottek, Thomas Powles, Oliver Rick2, Giovanni Rosti, Roberto Salvioni, Jutta Scheiderbauer2, Hans U. Schmelz9, Heinz Schmidberger23, Hans-Joachim Schmoll24, Mark Schrader9, Felix Sedlmayer, Niels E. Skakkebæk, Aslam Sohaib11, Sergei Tjulandin, Padraig Warde, Stefan Weinknecht, Lothar Weissbach, Christian Wittekind25, Eva Winter, Lori Wood, Hans von der Maase 
TL;DR: F refinements in the treatment of early- and advanced-stage testicular cancer have emerged from clinical trials, and expert clinical skills will continue to be one of the major determinants for the prognosis of patients with germ cell cancer.

569 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a class of finite-dimensional integrable systems that may be viewed as relativistic generalizations of the Calogero-Moser systems were studied.

568 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a simplified model of the phagocytic synapse and discuss the role of lysophosphatidylcholine as soluble attraction signal in the removal of apoptotic cells.

568 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
10 Jan 2019-Nature
TL;DR: In a phase I trial, highly individualized peptide vaccines against unmutated tumour antigens and neoepitopes elicited sustained responses in CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, respectively, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Abstract: Patients with glioblastoma currently do not sufficiently benefit from recent breakthroughs in cancer treatment that use checkpoint inhibitors1,2. For treatments using checkpoint inhibitors to be successful, a high mutational load and responses to neoepitopes are thought to be essential3. There is limited intratumoural infiltration of immune cells4 in glioblastoma and these tumours contain only 30–50 non-synonymous mutations5. Exploitation of the full repertoire of tumour antigens—that is, both unmutated antigens and neoepitopes—may offer more effective immunotherapies, especially for tumours with a low mutational load. Here, in the phase I trial GAPVAC-101 of the Glioma Actively Personalized Vaccine Consortium (GAPVAC), we integrated highly individualized vaccinations with both types of tumour antigens into standard care to optimally exploit the limited target space for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Fifteen patients with glioblastomas positive for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02:01 or HLA-A*24:02 were treated with a vaccine (APVAC1) derived from a premanufactured library of unmutated antigens followed by treatment with APVAC2, which preferentially targeted neoepitopes. Personalization was based on mutations and analyses of the transcriptomes and immunopeptidomes of the individual tumours. The GAPVAC approach was feasible and vaccines that had poly-ICLC (polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid-poly-l-lysine carboxymethylcellulose) and granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor as adjuvants displayed favourable safety and strong immunogenicity. Unmutated APVAC1 antigens elicited sustained responses of central memory CD8+ T cells. APVAC2 induced predominantly CD4+ T cell responses of T helper 1 type against predicted neoepitopes.

568 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Angela Cox1, Alison M. Dunning2, Montserrat Garcia-Closas3, Sabapathy P. Balasubramanian1, Malcolm W.R. Reed1, Karen A. Pooley2, Serena Scollen2, Caroline Baynes2, Bruce A.J. Ponder2, Stephen J. Chanock3, Jolanta Lissowska4, Louise A. Brinton3, Beata Peplonska5, Melissa C. Southey6, John L. Hopper6, Margaret R. E. McCredie7, Graham G. Giles8, Olivia Fletcher9, Nichola Johnson9, Isabel dos Santos Silva9, Lorna Gibson9, Stig E. Bojesen10, Børge G. Nordestgaard10, C K Axelsson10, Diana Torres11, Ute Hamann11, Christina Justenhoven12, Christina Justenhoven13, Hiltrud Brauch13, Hiltrud Brauch12, Jenny Chang-Claude11, Silke Kropp11, Angela Risch11, Shan Wang-Gohrke14, Peter Schürmann15, Natalia Bogdanova15, Thilo Dörk15, Rainer Fagerholm16, Kirsimari Aaltonen16, Carl Blomqvist16, Heli Nevanlinna16, Sheila Seal, Anthony Renwick, Michael R. Stratton, Nazneen Rahman, Suleeporn Sangrajrang, David J. Hughes17, Fabrice Odefrey17, Paul Brennan17, Amanda B. Spurdle18, Georgia Chenevix-Trench18, Jonathan Beesley18, Arto Mannermaa19, Jaana M. Hartikainen19, Vesa Kataja19, Veli-Matti Kosma19, Fergus J. Couch20, Janet E. Olson20, Ellen L. Goode20, Annegien Broeks21, Marjanka K. Schmidt21, Frans B. L. Hogervorst21, Laura J. van't Veer21, Daehee Kang22, Keun-Young Yoo22, Dong Young Noh22, Sei Hyun Ahn23, Sara Wedrén24, Per Hall24, Yen-Ling Low25, Jianjun Liu25, Roger L. Milne26, Gloria Ribas26, Anna González-Neira26, Javier Benitez26, Alice J. Sigurdson27, Alice J. Sigurdson3, Denise L. Stredrick3, Denise L. Stredrick27, Bruce H. Alexander3, Bruce H. Alexander27, Jeffery P. Struewing3, Jeffery P. Struewing27, Paul D.P. Pharoah2, Douglas F. Easton2 
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that common breast cancer susceptibility alleles with small effects on risk can be identified, given sufficiently powerful studies, as well as the need for further studies to confirm putative genetic associations with breast cancer.
Abstract: The Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) has been established to conduct combined case-control analyses with augmented statistical power to try to confirm putative genetic associations with breast cancer. We genotyped nine SNPs for which there was some prior evidence of an association with breast cancer: CASP8 D302H (rs1045485), IGFBP3 -202 C --> A (rs2854744), SOD2 V16A (rs1799725), TGFB1 L10P (rs1982073), ATM S49C (rs1800054), ADH1B 3' UTR A --> G (rs1042026), CDKN1A S31R (rs1801270), ICAM5 V301I (rs1056538) and NUMA1 A794G (rs3750913). We included data from 9-15 studies, comprising 11,391-18,290 cases and 14,753-22,670 controls. We found evidence of an association with breast cancer for CASP8 D302H (with odds ratios (OR) of 0.89 (95% confidence interval (c.i.): 0.85-0.94) and 0.74 (95% c.i.: 0.62-0.87) for heterozygotes and rare homozygotes, respectively, compared with common homozygotes; P(trend) = 1.1 x 10(-7)) and weaker evidence for TGFB1 L10P (OR = 1.07 (95% c.i.: 1.02-1.13) and 1.16 (95% c.i.: 1.08-1.25), respectively; P(trend) = 2.8 x 10(-5)). These results demonstrate that common breast cancer susceptibility alleles with small effects on risk can be identified, given sufficiently powerful studies.

567 citations


Authors

Showing all 41039 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
John Q. Trojanowski2261467213948
Lily Yeh Jan16246773655
Monique M.B. Breteler15954693762
Wolfgang Wagner1562342123391
Thomas Meitinger155716108491
Hermann Brenner1511765145655
Amartya Sen149689141907
Bernhard Schölkopf1481092149492
Niels Birbaumer14283577853
Detlef Weigel14251684670
Peter Lang140113698592
Marco Colonna13951271166
António Amorim136147796519
Alexis Brice13587083466
Elias Campo13576185160
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Heidelberg University
119.1K papers, 4.6M citations

98% related

Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
161.5K papers, 5.7M citations

98% related

University of Zurich
124K papers, 5.3M citations

95% related

Technische Universität München
123.4K papers, 4M citations

95% related

Radboud University Nijmegen
83K papers, 3.2M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023206
2022854
20214,700
20204,480
20194,045
20183,634