Institution
University of Utah
Education•Salt Lake City, Utah, United States•
About: University of Utah is a education organization based out in Salt Lake City, Utah, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 52894 authors who have published 124076 publications receiving 5265834 citations. The organization is also known as: The U & The University of Utah.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Health care, Cancer, Transplantation
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
695 citations
••
TL;DR: The 'hourglass' model of remodeller function is proposed, in which each remodeller subfamily utilizes diverse specialized proteins and protein domains to assist in nucleosomes targeting or to differentially detect nucleosome epitopes.
Abstract: Cells utilize diverse ATP-dependent nucleosome-remodelling complexes to carry out histone sliding, ejection or the incorporation of histone variants, suggesting that different mechanisms of action are used by the various chromatin-remodelling complex subfamilies. However, all chromatin-remodelling complex subfamilies contain an ATPase-translocase 'motor' that translocates DNA from a common location within the nucleosome. In this Review, we discuss (and illustrate with animations) an alternative, unifying mechanism of chromatin remodelling, which is based on the regulation of DNA translocation. We propose the 'hourglass' model of remodeller function, in which each remodeller subfamily utilizes diverse specialized proteins and protein domains to assist in nucleosome targeting or to differentially detect nucleosome epitopes. These modules converge to regulate a common DNA translocation mechanism, to inform the conserved ATPase 'motor' on whether and how to apply DNA translocation, which together achieve the various outcomes of chromatin remodelling: nucleosome assembly, chromatin access and nucleosome editing.
695 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare and contrast the approaches taken by Greenberg, Zykov, Fife, Krinskii and others, with particular emphasis on the case of rotating spiral waves, and discuss some possible extensions of the singular perturbation approach to propagating wave surfaces in three-dimensional space.
694 citations
••
Northwestern University1, Harvard University2, Johns Hopkins University3, University of Zurich4, Case Western Reserve University5, Christchurch Hospital6, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill7, Thomas Jefferson University8, Kurume University9, University of Paris10, VU University Amsterdam11, Moorfields Eye Hospital12, University of California, San Francisco13, Stanford University14, United States Department of Veterans Affairs15, University of California, Los Angeles16, Mayo Clinic17, St Thomas' Hospital18, Churchill Hospital19, University of Southern California20, National Institutes of Health21, University of Würzburg22, University of Utah23
TL;DR: Specific consensus-based recommendations were made regarding the definition, diagnostic criteria, pathogenic factors, medical treatment, and prognostic indicators for mucous membrane pemphigoid.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop consensus-based recommendations for streamlining medical communication among various health care professionals, to improve accuracy of diagnosis and treatment, and to facilitate future investigations for mucous membrane pemphigoid. PARTICIPANTS: Because of the highly specific nature of this group of diseases, the 26 invited participants included either international scholars in the field of mucous membrane pemphigoid or experts in cutaneous pharmacology representing the 3 medical disciplines ophthalmology, oral medicine, and dermatology. EVIDENCE: The first author (L.S.C.) conducted a literature search. Based on the information obtained, international experts who had contributed to the literature in the clinical care, diagnosis, and laboratory investigation for mucous membrane pemphigoid were invited to participate in a consensus meeting aimed at developing a consensus statement. CONSENSUS PROCESS: A consensus meeting was convened and conducted on May 10, 1999, in Chicago, Ill, to discuss the relevant issues. The first author drafted the statement based on the consensus developed at the meeting and the participants' written comments. The draft was submitted to all participants for 3 separate rounds of review, and disagreements were reconciled based on literature evidence. The third and final statement incorporated all relevant evidence obtained in the literature search and the consensus developed by the participants. The final statement was approved and endorsed by all 26 participants. CONCLUSIONS: Specific consensus-based recommendations were made regarding the definition, diagnostic criteria, pathogenic factors, medical treatment, and prognostic indicators for mucous membrane pemphigoid. A system of standard reporting for these patients was proposed to facilitate a uniform data collection.
693 citations
••
TL;DR: It is recommended that individuals considering genetic testing be counseled regarding the unknown efficacy of measures to reduce risk and that care for individuals with cancer-predisposing mutations be provided whenever possible within the context of research protocols designed to evaluate clinical outcomes.
Abstract: Objective. —To provide recommendations for cancer surveillance and risk reduction for individuals carrying mutations associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). Participants. —A task force with expertise in medical genetics, oncology, primary care, gastroenterology, and epidemiology convened by the Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium (CGSC), organized by the National Human Genome Research Institute (previously the National Center for Human Genome Research). Evidence. —Studies evaluating cancer risk, surveillance, and risk reduction in individuals genetically susceptible to colon cancer were identified using MEDLINE and bibliographies of articles thus identified. Indexing terms used were "genetics" in combination with "colon cancer," and "screening" in combination with "cancer family" and "HNPCC." For studies evaluating specific interventions, quality of evidence was assessed using criteria of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Consensus Process. —The task force developed recommendations through discussions over a 14-month period. Conclusions. —Efficacy of cancer surveillance or other measures to reduce risk in individuals who carry cancer-predisposing mutations is unknown. Based on observational studies, colonoscopy every 1 to 3 years starting at age 25 years is recommended for individuals known to have HNPCC-associated mutations. Endometrial cancer screening is also recommended, based on expert opinion concerning presumptive benefit. No recommendation is made for or against prophylactic surgery (ie, colectomy, hysterectomy); these surgeries are an option for mutation carriers, but evidence of benefit is lacking. It is recommended that individuals considering genetic testing be counseled regarding the unknown efficacy of measures to reduce risk and that care for individuals with cancer-predisposing mutations be provided whenever possible within the context of research protocols designed to evaluate clinical outcomes.
693 citations
Authors
Showing all 53431 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Bert Vogelstein | 247 | 757 | 332094 |
George M. Whitesides | 240 | 1739 | 269833 |
Hongjie Dai | 197 | 570 | 182579 |
Robert M. Califf | 196 | 1561 | 167961 |
Frank E. Speizer | 193 | 636 | 135891 |
Yusuke Nakamura | 179 | 2076 | 160313 |
David L. Kaplan | 177 | 1944 | 146082 |
Marc G. Caron | 173 | 674 | 99802 |
George M. Church | 172 | 900 | 120514 |
Steven P. Gygi | 172 | 704 | 129173 |
Lily Yeh Jan | 162 | 467 | 73655 |
Tobin J. Marks | 159 | 1621 | 111604 |
David W. Bates | 159 | 1239 | 116698 |
Alfred L. Goldberg | 156 | 474 | 88296 |
Charles M. Perou | 156 | 573 | 202951 |