scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Vermont

EducationBurlington, Vermont, United States
About: University of Vermont is a education organization based out in Burlington, Vermont, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 17592 authors who have published 38251 publications receiving 1609874 citations. The organization is also known as: UVM & University of Vermont and State Agricultural College.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review examines the fundamentals of neurogastroenterology that may underlie the pathophysiology of functional GI disorders (FGIDs) and emphasizes recent advances in understanding of the enteric nervous system, sensory physiology underlying pain, and stress signaling pathways.

315 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A clinically important withdrawal syndrome associated with cannabis dependence has been established and additional research must determine how cannabis withdrawal affects cessation attempts and the best way to treat its symptoms.
Abstract: Purpose of reviewThe demand for treatment for cannabis dependence has grown dramatically. The majority of the people who enter the treatment have difficulty in achieving and maintaining abstinence from cannabis. Understanding the impact of cannabis withdrawal syndrome on quit attempts is of obvious

314 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that species richness and species density can generate opposite patterns of community response to disturbance, which provides some support for Huston’s dynamic-equilibrium model but does not support the intermediate-disturbance hypothesis.
Abstract: Disturbance frequency, intensity, and areal extent may influence the effects of disturbance on biological communities. Furthermore, these three factors may have interacting effects on biological diversity. We manipulated the frequency, intensity, and area of disturbance in a full-factorial design on artificial substrates and measured responses of benthic macroinvertebrates in a northern Vermont stream. Macroinvertebrate abundance was lower in all disturbance treatments than in the undisturbed control. As in most other studies in streams, species density (number of species/sample) was lower in disturbed treatments than in undisturbed controls. However, species density is very sensitive to total abundance of a sample, which is usually reduced by disturbance. We used a rarefaction method to compare species richness based on an equivalent number of individuals. In rarefied samples, species richness was higher in all eight disturbed treatments than in the undisturbed control, with significant increases in species richness for larger areas and greater intensities of disturbance. Increases in species richness in response to disturbance were consistent within patches, among patches with similar disturbance histories, and among patches with differing disturbance histories. These results provide some support for Huston’s dynamic-equilibrium model but do not support the intermediate-disturbance hypothesis. Our analyses demonstrate that species richness and species density can generate opposite patterns of community response to disturbance. The interplay of abundance, species richness, and species density has been neglected in previous tests of disturbance models.

313 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
28 Sep 2010-Chaos
TL;DR: It is concluded that evaluating vulnerability in power networks using purely topological metrics can be misleading, and the vulnerability metrics for individual simulations show only a mild correlation.
Abstract: In order to identify the extent to which results from topological graph models are useful for modeling vulnerability in electricity infrastructure, we measure the susceptibility of power networks to random failures and directed attacks using three measures of vulnerability: characteristic path lengths, connectivity loss, and blackout sizes. The first two are purely topological metrics. The blackout size calculation results from a model of cascading failure in power networks. Testing the response of 40 areas within the Eastern U.S. power grid and a standard IEEE test case to a variety of attack/failure vectors indicates that directed attacks result in larger failures using all three vulnerability measures, but the attack-vectors that appear to cause the most damage depend on the measure chosen. While the topological metrics and the power grid model show some similar trends, the vulnerability metrics for individual simulations show only a mild correlation. We conclude that evaluating vulnerability in power networks using purely topological metrics can be misleading.

313 citations


Authors

Showing all 17727 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Albert Hofman2672530321405
Ralph B. D'Agostino2261287229636
George Davey Smith2242540248373
Stephen V. Faraone1881427140298
Valentin Fuster1791462185164
Dennis J. Selkoe177607145825
Anders Björklund16576984268
Alfred L. Goldberg15647488296
Christopher P. Cannon1511118108906
Debbie A Lawlor1471114101123
Roger J. Davis147498103478
Andrew S. Levey144600156845
Jonathan G. Seidman13756389782
Yu Huang136149289209
Christine E. Seidman13451967895
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Minnesota
257.9K papers, 11.9M citations

97% related

Duke University
200.3K papers, 10.7M citations

96% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

96% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

96% related

Cornell University
235.5K papers, 12.2M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202359
2022177
20211,840
20201,762
20191,653
20181,569