scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Vermont

EducationBurlington, Vermont, United States
About: University of Vermont is a education organization based out in Burlington, Vermont, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 17592 authors who have published 38251 publications receiving 1609874 citations. The organization is also known as: UVM & University of Vermont and State Agricultural College.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A theoretical framework is developed from a review of the literature and interpretations of completed research exploring the teaching practices of doctorally prepared Latina nursing faculty for analyzing how the authors engage with Others, those perceived as different from self.
Abstract: This article proposes a theoretical framework for analyzing how we engage with Others, those perceived as different from self. This engagement, termed Othering, is presented as two particular processes: Exclusionary and Inclusionary. A theoretical framework is developed from a review of the literature and interpretations of completed research exploring the teaching practices of doctorally prepared Latina nursing faculty. Conceptualizing Othering as both exclusive and inclusive processes expands the boundaries for understanding and interacting with those perceived as different. Exclusionary Othering often utilizes the power within relationships for domination and subordination, whereas Inclusionary Othering attempts to utilize power within relationships for transformation and coalition building. The implications of this framework for nursing practice are addressed.

277 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2007
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors classify the Fourier reconstruction methods into three groups: Fourier reconstructions, modified back-projection methods, and iterative direct space methods, where the second group includes convolution back projection as well as weighted back projection.
Abstract: Traditionally, three-dimensional reconstruction methods have been classified into two major groups, Fourier reconstruction methods and direct methods (e.g., Crowther et al., 1970; Gilbert, 1972). Fourier methods are defined as algorithms that restore the Fourier transform of the object from the Fourier transforms of the projections and then obtain the real-space distribution of the object by inverse Fourier transformation. Included in this group are also equivalent reconstruction schemes that use expansions of object and projections into orthogonal function systems (e.g., Cormack, 1963, 1964; Smith et al., 1973; Zeitler, Chapter 4). In contrast, direct methods are defined as those that carry out all calculations in real space. These include the convolution back-projection algorithms (Bracewell and Riddle, 1967; Ramachandran and Lakshminarayanan, 1971; Gilbert, 1972) and iterative algorithms (Gordon et al., 1970; Colsher, 1977). Weighted back-projection methods are difficult to classify in this scheme, since they are equivalent to convolution back-projection algorithms, but work on the real-space data as well as the Fourier transform data of either the object or the projections. Both convolution back-projection and weighted back-projection algorithms are based on the same theory as Fourier reconstruction methods, whereas iterative methods normally do not take into account the Fourier relations between object transform and projection transforms. Thus, it seems justified to classify the reconstruction algorithms into three groups: Fourier reconstruction methods, modified back-projection methods, and iterative direct space methods, where the second group includes convolution backprojection as well as weighted back-projection methods.

276 citations

Posted ContentDOI
Donald J. Hagler1, Sean N. Hatton1, Carolina Makowski2, M. Daniela Cornejo3, Damien A. Fair3, Anthony Steven Dick4, Matthew T. Sutherland4, B. J. Casey5, M Deanna6, Michael P. Harms6, Richard Watts5, James M. Bjork7, Hugh Garavan8, Laura Hilmer1, Christopher J. Pung1, Chelsea S. Sicat1, Joshua M. Kuperman1, Hauke Bartsch1, Feng Xue1, Mary M. Heitzeg9, Angela R. Laird4, Thanh T. Trinh1, Raul Gonzalez4, Susan F. Tapert1, Michael C. Riedel4, Lindsay M. Squeglia10, Luke W. Hyde9, Monica D. Rosenberg5, Eric Earl3, Katia D. Howlett11, Fiona C. Baker12, Mary E. Soules9, Jazmin Diaz1, Octavio Ruiz de Leon1, Wesley K. Thompson1, Michael C. Neale7, Megan M. Herting13, Elizabeth R. Sowell13, Ruben P. Alvarez14, Samuel W. Hawes4, Mariana Sanchez4, Jerzy Bodurka15, Florence J. Breslin15, Amanda Sheffield Morris15, Martin P. Paulus15, W. Kyle Simmons15, Jonathan R. Polimeni16, Andre van der Kouwe16, Andrew S. Nencka17, Kevin M. Gray10, Carlo Pierpaoli14, John A. Matochik14, Antonio Noronha14, Will M. Aklin11, Kevin P. Conway11, Meyer D. Glantz11, Elizabeth Hoffman11, Roger Little11, Marsha F. Lopez11, Vani Pariyadath11, Susan R.B. Weiss11, Dana L. Wolff-Hughes, Rebecca DelCarmen-Wiggins, Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing3, Oscar Miranda-Dominguez3, Bonnie J. Nagel3, Anders Perrone3, Darrick Sturgeon3, Aimee Goldstone12, Adolf Pfefferbaum12, Kilian M. Pohl12, Devin Prouty12, Kristina A. Uban1, Susan Y. Bookheimer1, Mirella Dapretto1, Adriana Galván1, Kara Bagot1, Jay N. Giedd1, M. Alejandra Infante1, Joanna Jacobus1, Kevin Patrick1, Paul D. Shilling1, Rahul S. Desikan1, Yi Li1, Leo P. Sugrue1, Marie T. Banich18, Naomi P. Friedman18, John K. Hewitt18, Christian J. Hopfer18, Joseph T. Sakai18, Jody Tanabe18, Linda B. Cottler19, Sara Jo Nixon19, Linda Chang20, Christine C. Cloak20, Thomas Ernst20, Gloria Reeves20, David N. Kennedy21, Steve Heeringa9, Scott Peltier9, John E. Schulenberg9, Chandra Sripada9, Robert A. Zucker9, William G. Iacono22, Monica Luciana22, Finnegan J. Calabro23, Duncan B. Clark23, David A. Lewis23, Beatriz Luna23, Claudiu Schirda23, Tufikameni Brima24, John J. Foxe24, Edward G. Freedman24, Daniel W. Mruzek24, Michael J. Mason25, Rebekah S. Huber26, Erin McGlade26, Andrew P. Prescot26, Perry F. Renshaw26, Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd26, Nicholas Allgaier8, Julie A. Dumas8, Masha Y. Ivanova8, Alexandra Potter8, Paul Florsheim27, Christine L. Larson27, Krista M. Lisdahl27, Michael E. Charness28, Bernard F. Fuemmeler7, John M. Hettema7, Joel L. Steinberg7, Andrey P. Anokhin6, Paul E.A. Glaser6, Andrew C. Heath6, Pamela A. F. Madden6, Arielle R. Baskin-Sommers5, R. Todd Constable5, Steven Grant11, Gayathri J. Dowling11, Sandra A. Brown1, Terry L. Jernigan1, Anders M. Dale1 
04 Nov 2018-bioRxiv
TL;DR: The baseline neuroimaging processing and subject-level analysis methods used by the ABCD DAIC in the centralized processing and extraction of neuroanatomical and functional imaging phenotypes are described.
Abstract: The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study is an ongoing, nationwide study of the effects of environmental influences on behavioral and brain development in adolescents. The ABCD Study is a collaborative effort, including a Coordinating Center, 21 data acquisition sites across the United States, and a Data Analysis and Informatics Center (DAIC). The main objective of the study is to recruit and assess over eleven thousand 9-10-year-olds and follow them over the course of 10 years to characterize normative brain and cognitive development, the many factors that influence brain development, and the effects of those factors on mental health and other outcomes. The study employs state-of-the-art multimodal brain imaging, cognitive and clinical assessments, bioassays, and careful assessment of substance use, environment, psychopathological symptoms, and social functioning. The data will provide a resource of unprecedented scale and depth for studying typical and atypical development. Here, we describe the baseline neuroimaging processing and subject-level analysis methods used by the ABCD DAIC in the centralized processing and extraction of neuroanatomical and functional imaging phenotypes. Neuroimaging processing and analyses include modality-specific corrections for distortions and motion, brain segmentation and cortical surface reconstruction derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), analysis of brain microstructure using diffusion MRI (dMRI), task-related analysis of functional MRI (fMRI), and functional connectivity analysis of resting-state fMRI.

276 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An important role for context is suggested in the extinction process of fear extinction and conditioning and has a number of novel implications for exposure therapy and relapse after treatment.

276 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: From 2005 to 2014, rates of death prior to discharge and serious morbidities decreased among the NICUs in this study, providing a novel way to quantify the magnitude and pace of improvement in neonatology.
Abstract: Importance Hospitals use rates from the best quartile or decile as benchmarks for quality improvement aims, but to what extent these aims are achievable is uncertain. Objective To determine the proportion of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in 2014 that achieved rates for death and major morbidities as low as the shrunken adjusted rates from the best quartile and decile in 2005 and the time it took to achieve those rates. Design, Setting, and Participants A total of 408 164 infants with a birth weight of 501 to 1500 g born from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2014, and cared for at 756 Vermont Oxford Network member NICUs in the United States were evaluated. Logistic regression models with empirical Bayes factors were used to estimate standardized morbidity ratios for each NICU. Each ratio was multiplied by the overall network rate to calculate the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles of the shrunken adjusted rates for each year. The proportion in 2014 that achieved the 10th and 25th percentile rates from 2005 and the number of years it took for 75% of NICUs to achieve the 2005 rates from the best quartile were estimated. Main Outcomes and Measures Death prior to hospital discharge, infection more than 3 days after birth, severe retinopathy of prematurity, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and chronic lung disease among infants less than 33 weeks’ gestational age at birth. Results Of the 756 hospitals, 695 provided data for 2014. The mean unadjusted infant-level rate of death before hospital discharge decreased from 14.0% in 2005 to 10.9% in 2014. In 2014, 689 of 695 NICUs (99.1%; 95% CI, 97.4%-100.0%) achieved the 2005 shrunken adjusted rates from the best quartile for death prior to discharge, 678 of 695 (97.6%; 95% CI, 95.8%-99.6%) for late-onset infection, 558 of 681 (81.9%; 95% CI, 77.2%-86.6%) for severe retinopathy of prematurity, 611 of 693 (88.2%; 95% CI, 81.7%-97.0%) for severe intraventricular hemorrhage, 529 of 696 (76.0%; 95% CI, 71.8%-81.2%) for necrotizing enterocolitis, and 286 of 693 (41.3%; 95% CI, 36.1%-45.6%) for chronic lung disease. It took 3 years before 445 NICUs (75.0%) achieved the 2005 shrunken adjusted rate from the best quartile for death prior to discharge, 5 years to achieve the rate from the best quartile for late-onset infection, 6 years to achieve the rate from the best quartile for severe retinopathy of prematurity and severe intraventricular hemorrhage, and 8 years to achieve the rate from the best quartile for necrotizing enterocolitis. Conclusions and Relevance From 2005 to 2014, rates of death prior to discharge and serious morbidities decreased among the NICUs in this study. Within 8 years, 75% of NICUs achieved rates of performance from the best quartile of the 2005 benchmark for all outcomes except chronic lung disease. These findings provide a novel way to quantify the magnitude and pace of improvement in neonatology.

276 citations


Authors

Showing all 17727 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Albert Hofman2672530321405
Ralph B. D'Agostino2261287229636
George Davey Smith2242540248373
Stephen V. Faraone1881427140298
Valentin Fuster1791462185164
Dennis J. Selkoe177607145825
Anders Björklund16576984268
Alfred L. Goldberg15647488296
Christopher P. Cannon1511118108906
Debbie A Lawlor1471114101123
Roger J. Davis147498103478
Andrew S. Levey144600156845
Jonathan G. Seidman13756389782
Yu Huang136149289209
Christine E. Seidman13451967895
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Minnesota
257.9K papers, 11.9M citations

97% related

Duke University
200.3K papers, 10.7M citations

96% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

96% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

96% related

Cornell University
235.5K papers, 12.2M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202359
2022177
20211,841
20201,762
20191,653
20181,569