scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Warwick

EducationCoventry, Warwickshire, United Kingdom
About: University of Warwick is a education organization based out in Coventry, Warwickshire, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & White dwarf. The organization has 26212 authors who have published 77127 publications receiving 2666552 citations. The organization is also known as: Warwick University & The University of Warwick.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The essay draws on a wide range of social science ideas to lay out a set of internally consistent insights and assumptions to guide thinking and empirical inquiry about the analysis of process issues in strategic management.
Abstract: This essay discusses the character and significance of strategy process research. Process research in strategic management is paradigmatically diverse and empirically complex. Strategy process research has been narrow in its focus and its undoubted contribution has sometimes been obscured by the lack of explicit discourse about its analytical foundations. The essay draws on a wide range of social science ideas to lay out a set of internally consistent insights and assumptions to guide thinking and empirical inquiry about the analysis of process issues in strategic management. The essay also provides a guide to the eight papers contained in this special issue.

1,103 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Aysu Okbay1, Jonathan P. Beauchamp2, Mark Alan Fontana3, James J. Lee4  +293 moreInstitutions (81)
26 May 2016-Nature
TL;DR: In this article, the results of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for educational attainment were reported, showing that single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with educational attainment disproportionately occur in genomic regions regulating gene expression in the fetal brain.
Abstract: Educational attainment is strongly influenced by social and other environmental factors, but genetic factors are estimated to account for at least 20% of the variation across individuals. Here we report the results of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for educational attainment that extends our earlier discovery sample of 101,069 individuals to 293,723 individuals, and a replication study in an independent sample of 111,349 individuals from the UK Biobank. We identify 74 genome-wide significant loci associated with the number of years of schooling completed. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with educational attainment are disproportionately found in genomic regions regulating gene expression in the fetal brain. Candidate genes are preferentially expressed in neural tissue, especially during the prenatal period, and enriched for biological pathways involved in neural development. Our findings demonstrate that, even for a behavioural phenotype that is mostly environmentally determined, a well-powered GWAS identifies replicable associated genetic variants that suggest biologically relevant pathways. Because educational attainment is measured in large numbers of individuals, it will continue to be useful as a proxy phenotype in efforts to characterize the genetic influences of related phenotypes, including cognition and neuropsychiatric diseases.

1,102 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper presents a symmetric generalised metric for such topologies, an approach which sheds new light on how metric tools such as Banach's Theorem can be extended to non‐Hausdorff topologies.
Abstract: Metric spaces are inevitably Hausdorff and so cannot, for example, be used to study non-Hausdorff topologies such as those required in the Tarskian approach to programming language semantics. This paper presents a symmetric generalised metric for such topologies, an approach which sheds new light on how metric tools such as Banach's Theorem can be extended to non-Hausdorff topologies.

1,090 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2014-Gut
TL;DR: These guidelines provide a practical and evidence-based resource for the management of patients with Barrett's oesophagus and related early neoplasia and suggested stratification of patients according to their estimated cancer risk based on clinical and histopathological criteria for the first time.
Abstract: These guidelines provide a practical and evidence-based resource for the management of patients with Barrett's oesophagus and related early neoplasia. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument was followed to provide a methodological strategy for the guideline development. A systematic review of the literature was performed for English language articles published up until December 2012 in order to address controversial issues in Barrett's oesophagus including definition, screening and diagnosis, surveillance, pathological grading for dysplasia, management of dysplasia, and early cancer including training requirements. The rigour and quality of the studies was evaluated using the SIGN checklist system. Recommendations on each topic were scored by each author using a five-tier system (A+, strong agreement, to D+, strongly disagree). Statements that failed to reach substantial agreement among authors, defined as >80% agreement (A or A+), were revisited and modified until substantial agreement (>80%) was reached. In formulating these guidelines, we took into consideration benefits and risks for the population and national health system, as well as patient perspectives. For the first time, we have suggested stratification of patients according to their estimated cancer risk based on clinical and histopathological criteria. In order to improve communication between clinicians, we recommend the use of minimum datasets for reporting endoscopic and pathological findings. We advocate endoscopic therapy for high-grade dysplasia and early cancer, which should be performed in high-volume centres. We hope that these guidelines will standardise and improve management for patients with Barrett's oesophagus and related neoplasia.

1,083 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors organize the existing work on trust development into four broad areas: the behavioral approach, three specific conceptualizations of the psychological approach (unidimensional, two-dimensional, and transformational models), and compare and contrast across these approaches and use this analysis to identify unanswered questions and formulate directions for future research.

1,079 citations


Authors

Showing all 26659 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
David Miller2032573204840
Daniel R. Weinberger177879128450
Kay-Tee Khaw1741389138782
Joseph E. Stiglitz1641142152469
Edmund T. Rolls15361277928
Thomas J. Smith1401775113919
Tim Jones135131491422
Ian Ford13467885769
Paul Harrison133140080539
Sinead Farrington133142291099
Peter Hall132164085019
Paul Brennan132122172748
G. T. Jones13186475491
Peter Simmonds13182362953
Tim Martin12987882390
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

95% related

University of Oxford
258.1K papers, 12.9M citations

95% related

University of Bristol
113.1K papers, 4.9M citations

94% related

University of Cambridge
282.2K papers, 14.4M citations

94% related

University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023195
2022734
20214,816
20204,927
20194,602
20184,132