Institution
University of Würzburg
Education•Wurzburg, Bayern, Germany•
About: University of Würzburg is a education organization based out in Wurzburg, Bayern, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Gene. The organization has 31437 authors who have published 62203 publications receiving 2337033 citations. The organization is also known as: Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg & Würzburg University.
Topics: Population, Gene, Immune system, Receptor, CAS Registry Number
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The data confirm that the quantum transport through the (helical) edge channels is dissipationless and that the contacts lead to equilibration between the counterpropagating spin states at the edge, which agree quantitatively with the theory of the quantum spin Hall effect.
Abstract: Nonlocal transport through edge channels holds great promise for low-power information processing. However, edge channels have so far only been demonstrated to occur in the quantum Hall regime, at high magnetic fields. We found that mercury telluride quantum wells in the quantum spin Hall regime exhibit nonlocal edge channel transport at zero external magnetic field. The data confirm that the quantum transport through the (helical) edge channels is dissipationless and that the contacts lead to equilibration between the counterpropagating spin states at the edge. The experimental data agree quantitatively with the theory of the quantum spin Hall effect. The edge channel transport paves the way for a new generation of spintronic devices for low-power information processing.
688 citations
••
TL;DR: In response to the gain or loss of these key molecular determinants, significant adaptation reactions can modify the cell's shape, pattern, and migration mechanism; examples of this include the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and collective-amoeboid transition.
685 citations
••
TL;DR: Butyrate has been shown to be the preferred energy substrate for the colonocyte and to be a potent differentiating agent in cell culture, and may also have a role in preventing certain types of colitis.
Abstract: Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are the products of colonic bacterial degradation of unabsorbed starch and non-starch polysaccharide (fibre). They are important anions in the colonic lumen, affecting both colonocyte morphology and function. The three main acids (acetate, propionate, and butyrate) stimulate colonic sodium and fluid absorption and exert proliferative effects on the colonocyte. Experimental animal studies have shown that they promote adaptive responses to small intestinal resection and colonic anastomosis. Acetate increases colonic blood flow and enhances ileal motility. Butyrate has been shown to be the preferred energy substrate for the colonocyte and to be a potent differentiating agent in cell culture. Butyrate may also have a role in preventing certain types of colitis. A diet low in resistant starch and fibre, which will result in a low production of SCFAs in the colon, may explain the high occurrence of colonic disorders seen in the Western civilization.
685 citations
••
University of Navarra1, Seoul National University Hospital2, Ankara University3, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens4, Alexandria University5, Medical University of Warsaw6, University of Kiel7, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital8, Siriraj Hospital9, University of Milan10, Mahidol University11, Chonnam National University12, Harvard University13, University College London14, Singapore General Hospital15, St Bartholomew's Hospital16, Université de Montréal17, Karolinska University Hospital18, Peking Union Medical College19, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre20, University of Barcelona21, Capital Medical University22, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir23, University of Copenhagen24, Emory University25, University of Salamanca26, Sahlgrenska University Hospital27, Kyungpook National University28, Memorial Hospital of South Bend29, Gachon University30, University of Würzburg31, Novartis32
TL;DR: Panobinostat is a potent oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor that in preclinical studies has synergistic anti-myeloma activity when combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone and the proportion of patients achieving an overall response did not differ between treatment groups.
Abstract: Summary Background Panobinostat is a potent oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor that in preclinical studies has synergistic anti-myeloma activity when combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone. We aimed to compare panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with placebo, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Methods PANORAMA1 is a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial of patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have received between one and three previous treatment regimens. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web-based and voice response system, stratified by number of previous treatment lines and by previous use of bortezomib, to receive 21 day cycles of placebo or panobinostat (20 mg; on days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, orally), both in combination with bortezomib (1·3 mg/m 2 on days 1, 4, 8, 11, intravenously) and dexamethasone (20 mg on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, orally). Patients, physicians, and the investigators who did the data analysis were masked to treatment allocation; crossover was not permitted. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (in accordance with modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria and based on investigators' assessment) and was analysed by intention to treat. The study is ongoing, but no longer recruiting, and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01023308. Findings 768 patients were enrolled between Jan 21, 2010, and Feb 29, 2012, with 387 randomly assigned to panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone and 381 to placebo, bortezomib, and dexamethasone. Median follow-up was 6·47 months (IQR 1·81–13·47) in the panobinostat group and 5·59 months (2·14–11·30) in the placebo group. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the panobinostat group than in the placebo group (11·99 months [95% CI 10·33–12·94] vs 8·08 months [7·56–9·23]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·63, 95% CI 0·52–0·76; p vs 208 [54·6%, 49·4–59·7] for placebo; p=0·09); however, the proportion of patients with a complete or near complete response was significantly higher in the panobinostat group than in the placebo group (107 [27·6%, 95% CI 23·2–32·4] vs 60 [15·7%, 12·2–19·8]; p=0·00006). Minimal responses were noted in 23 (6%) patients in the panobinostat group and in 42 (11%) in the placebo group. Median duration of response (partial response or better) was 13·14 months (95% CI 11·76–14·92) in the panobinostat group and 10·87 months (9·23–11·76) in the placebo group, and median time to response (partial response or better) was 1·51 months (1·41–1·64) in the panobinostat group and 2·00 months (1·61–2·79) in the placebo group. Serious adverse events were reported in 228 (60%) of 381 patients in the panobinostat group and 157 (42%) of 377 patients in the placebo group. Common grade 3–4 laboratory abnormalities and adverse events (irrespective of association with study drug) included thrombocytopenia (256 [67%] in the panobinostat group vs 118 [31%] in the placebo group), lymphopenia (202 [53%] vs 150 [40%]), diarrhoea (97 [26%] vs 30 [8%]), asthenia or fatigue (91 [24%] vs 45 [12%]), and peripheral neuropathy (67 [18%] vs 55 [15%]). Interpretation Our results suggest that panobinostat could be a useful addition to the treatment armamentarium for patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Longer follow up will be necessary to determine whether there is any effect on overall survival. Funding Novartis Pharmaceuticals.
685 citations
••
TL;DR: Although known for over 90 years, only in the past two decades has the chemistry of diboron(4) compounds been extensively explored and these compounds now feature prominently in both metal-catalyzed and metal-free methodologies for the formation of B-C bonds and other processes.
Abstract: Although known for over 90 years, only in the past two decades has the chemistry of diboron(4) compounds been extensively explored. Many interesting structural features and reaction patterns have emerged, and more importantly, these compounds now feature prominently in both metal-catalyzed and metal-free methodologies for the formation of B–C bonds and other processes.
684 citations
Authors
Showing all 31653 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Peer Bork | 206 | 697 | 245427 |
Cyrus Cooper | 204 | 1869 | 206782 |
D. M. Strom | 176 | 3167 | 194314 |
George P. Chrousos | 169 | 1612 | 120752 |
David A. Bennett | 167 | 1142 | 109844 |
Marc W. Kirschner | 162 | 457 | 102145 |
Josef M. Penninger | 154 | 700 | 107295 |
William A. Catterall | 154 | 536 | 83561 |
Rui Zhang | 151 | 2625 | 107917 |
Niels Birbaumer | 142 | 835 | 77853 |
Kim Nasmyth | 142 | 294 | 59231 |
James J. Gross | 139 | 529 | 100206 |
Michael Schmitt | 134 | 2007 | 114667 |
Jean-Luc Brédas | 134 | 1026 | 85803 |
Alexander Schmidt | 134 | 1185 | 83879 |