Institution
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Healthcare•Nashville, Tennessee, United States•
About: Vanderbilt University Medical Center is a healthcare organization based out in Nashville, Tennessee, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 20504 authors who have published 34612 publications receiving 1126649 citations.
Topics: Population, Transplantation, Cancer, Health care, Medicine
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: The Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) data management platform was developed in 2004 to address an institutional need at Vanderbilt University, then shared with a limited number of adopting sites beginning in 2006, and a broader consortium sharing and support model was created.
8,712 citations
TL;DR: This document summarizes current research, plans, and recommendations for future research, as well as providing a history of the field and some of the techniques used, currently in use, at the National Institutes of Health.
Abstract: Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair
Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect
Nancy M. Albert, PhD, RN, FAHA
Biykem Bozkurt, MD, PhD, FACC, FAHA
Ralph G. Brindis, MD, MPH, MACC
Mark A. Creager, MD, FACC, FAHA[#][1]
Lesley H. Curtis, PhD, FAHA
David DeMets, PhD[#][1]
Robert A
6,967 citations
St George's Hospital1, New York University2, McMaster University3, Brown University4, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart5, Hebron University6, University of Manitoba7, Emory University Hospital8, Hebrew University of Jerusalem9, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre10, University of Pittsburgh11, Saint Thomas - West Hospital12, University College London13, Vanderbilt University Medical Center14, Keio University15, Memorial Hospital of South Bend16, Cooper University Hospital17, University of Mississippi Medical Center18, Rush University Medical Center19, University of Ulsan20, Federal University of São Paulo21, Regions Hospital22, St. Michael's Hospital23, Washington University in St. Louis24, Ottawa Hospital25, University of Sydney26, Mount Sinai Hospital27, University of New South Wales28, Fujita Health University29, Christiana Care Health System30, Stanford University31, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology32, University of Kansas33, Harvard University34, California Pacific Medical Center35, University of Amsterdam36, Houston Methodist Hospital37
TL;DR: Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.
Abstract: To provide an update to “Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012”. A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development. The panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable. The Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions. Substantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.
4,303 citations
Imperial College London1, National Institutes of Health2, University of Alberta3, Boston Children's Hospital4, University of Sydney5, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital6, University of Giessen7, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre8, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign9, Medical University of Graz10, Vanderbilt University Medical Center11, University of São Paulo12
TL;DR: In this paper, a clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension (PH) was established, categorizing PH into groups which share similar pathological and hemodynamic characteristics and therapeutic approaches, and the main change was to withdraw persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) from Group 1 because this entity carries more differences than similarities with other PAH subgroups.
4,135 citations
Vanderbilt University Medical Center1, Medical University of Vienna2, University of Minnesota3, National Institutes of Health4, University of Regensburg5, Mayo Clinic6, Brigham and Women's Hospital7, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center8, BC Cancer Agency9, State University of Campinas10, Stanford University11, University of Michigan12, Harvard University13, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine14
TL;DR: The 2014 NIH consensus maintains the framework of the prior consensus with further refinement based on new evidence, and focuses attention on the causes of organ-specific abnormalities to chronic GVHD.
4,122 citations
Authors
Showing all 20810 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald C. Kessler | 274 | 1332 | 328983 |
| Eric Boerwinkle | 183 | 1321 | 170971 |
| Brenda W.J.H. Penninx | 170 | 1139 | 119082 |
| Marc A. Pfeffer | 166 | 765 | 133043 |
| Gerald I. Shulman | 164 | 579 | 109520 |
| Lex M. Bouter | 158 | 767 | 103034 |
| Frederik Barkhof | 154 | 1449 | 104982 |
| Wei Zheng | 151 | 1929 | 120209 |
| Robert O. Bonow | 149 | 808 | 114836 |
| Judy Garber | 147 | 756 | 79157 |
| Martin J. Blaser | 147 | 820 | 104104 |
| Peter J. Schwartz | 147 | 647 | 107695 |
| Philip Scheltens | 140 | 1175 | 107312 |
| Herbert Y. Meltzer | 137 | 1148 | 81371 |
| David G. Harrison | 137 | 492 | 72190 |