scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Vienna University of Technology

EducationVienna, Austria
About: Vienna University of Technology is a education organization based out in Vienna, Austria. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Laser & Cloud computing. The organization has 16723 authors who have published 49341 publications receiving 1302168 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors divide Edge Intelligence into two categories: Intelligence-enabled Edge Computing (IEC) and Artificial Intelligence on Edge (AI on Edge) to provide more optimal solutions to key problems in edge computing with the help of popular and effective AI technologies.
Abstract: Along with the rapid developments in communication technologies and the surge in the use of mobile devices, a brand-new computation paradigm, Edge Computing, is surging in popularity. Meanwhile, Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications are thriving with the breakthroughs in deep learning and the many improvements in hardware architectures. Billions of data bytes, generated at the network edge, put massive demands on data processing and structural optimization. Thus, there exists a strong demand to integrate Edge Computing and AI, which gives birth to Edge Intelligence. In this paper, we divide Edge Intelligence into AI for edge (Intelligence-enabled Edge Computing) and AI on edge (Artificial Intelligence on Edge). The former focuses on providing more optimal solutions to key problems in Edge Computing with the help of popular and effective AI technologies while the latter studies how to carry out the entire process of building AI models, i.e., model training and inference, on the edge. This paper provides insights into this new inter-disciplinary field from a broader perspective. It discusses the core concepts and the research road-map, which should provide the necessary background for potential future research initiatives in Edge Intelligence.

362 citations

Proceedings Article
31 Jul 1999
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare tractable classes of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) and introduce a new class of tractable CSPs based on the concept of hypertree decomposition.
Abstract: We compare tractable classes of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). We first give a uniform presentation of the major structural CSP decomposition methods. We then introduce a new class of tractable CSPs based on the concept of hypertree decomposition recently developed in Database Theory. We introduce a framework for comparing parametric decomposition-based methods according to tractability criteria and compare the most relevant methods. We show that the method of hypertree decomposition dominates the others in the case of general (nonbinary) CSPs.

362 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that the investigated biodegradable magnesium alloy not only achieves enhanced bone response but also excellent interfacial strength and thus fulfils two critical requirements for bone implant applications.

362 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Feb 1998
TL;DR: In this paper, the angular domain is considered for flat fading and frequency-selective fading channels and a generic channel model is introduced incorporating directions of arrival and a set of parameters is given for its configuration.
Abstract: The definition of flat fading and frequency-selective fading channels is extended to low-rank and high-rank channels to include the angular domain. By physical reasoning a generic channel model is introduced incorporating directions of arrival and a set of parameters is given for its configuration. The time evolution of the scattering processes and directions of arrival is taken into account. Analytical expressions are derived for space-correlation coefficients and frequency-correlation coefficients. Spatial correlation decreases with increasing angular spread and decreasing angle of incidence, measured from array broadside.

361 citations

DOI
01 Jun 2009
TL;DR: The paper gives an overview of different types of rankings, introduces an own approach called ‘Smart City ranking’ and shows how this approach can be used as an effective instrument for detecting strengths and weaknesses and improving a city’s competitiveness through relevant strategic efforts.
Abstract: Because of radical economic and technological changes cities are facing growing competition for investors, tourists, qualified labour or international events over the last decades (see Begg 1999). As a consequence city rankings have experienced a remarkable boom: On the one hand the comparison of cities can support investors in their choice of location, on the other hand it can be an important guide for the cities to judge their strengths and weaknesses and to define their goals and strategies for future development and better positioning in the urban system. However, there is some evidence that the discussion of city rankings is mainly concentrated on the final ranks totally neglecting (1) the methods and indicators used (see Schonert 2003) resp. (2) its purpose and effectiveness for strategic planning aiming at the strengthening of the position to be gained. In front of this development, this paper concentrates first on the question what are the basic characteristics of national and international city rankings. Correspondingly, a selected number of city rankings are analyzed in order to identify different types of such rankings. Thereby, the number and features of the indicators used in these rankings as well as their methods of sequencing is described systematically. The sample of indicators and the complexity of the ranking approach itself constitute the base for a quality assessment of city rankings discussed within this paper. In particular, an own ranking approach („European Smart Cities“) 1 is described.

358 citations


Authors

Showing all 16934 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Krzysztof Matyjaszewski1691431128585
Wolfgang Wagner1562342123391
Marco Zanetti1451439104610
Sridhara Dasu1401675103185
Duncan Carlsmith1381660103642
Ulrich Heintz136168899829
Matthew Herndon133173297466
Frank Würthwein133158494613
Alain Hervé132127987763
Manfred Jeitler132127889645
David Taylor131246993220
Roberto Covarelli131151689981
Patricia McBride129123081787
David Smith1292184100917
Lindsey Gray129117081317
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
98.2K papers, 4.3M citations

94% related

Delft University of Technology
94.4K papers, 2.7M citations

94% related

ETH Zurich
122.4K papers, 5.1M citations

94% related

Georgia Institute of Technology
119K papers, 4.6M citations

93% related

RWTH Aachen University
96.2K papers, 2.5M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023171
2022379
20212,527
20202,811
20192,846
20182,650