scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Washington State University

EducationPullman, Washington, United States
About: Washington State University is a education organization based out in Pullman, Washington, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Gene. The organization has 26947 authors who have published 57736 publications receiving 2341509 citations. The organization is also known as: WSU & Wazzu.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors predict that larger offices of Big 4 auditors will have higher quality audits for SEC registrants due to greater in-house experience in administering such audits.
Abstract: Larger offices of Big 4 auditors are predicted to have higher quality audits for SEC registrants due to greater in‐house experience in administering such audits. We test this prediction b...

981 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
23 Aug 1991-Science
TL;DR: It is established that a polypeptide factor can initiate signal transduction to regulate the synthesis of defensive proteins in plant tissues.
Abstract: Defensive genes in plants can be activated by several different types of nonpeptide signaling molecules. An endogenous polypeptide, consisting of 18 amino acids, was isolated from tomato leaves and was able at very low concentrations to induce the synthesis of two wound-inducible proteinase inhibitor proteins when supplied to young tomato plants. The sequence of the polypeptide was determined, and an identical polypeptide was synthesized that possessed full inducing activity. These data establish that a polypeptide factor can initiate signal transduction to regulate the synthesis of defensive proteins in plant tissues.

973 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: More studies are needed to connect the suspected mechanisms underlying both classes of hypotheses with quantitative changes in amphibian population sizes and species numbers, and to identify the hypotheses and conditions under which the various causes operate alone or together.
Abstract: Reports of malformed amphibians and global amphibian declines have led to public concern, particularly because amphibians are thought to be indicator species of overall envi- ronmental health. The topic also draws scientific attention because there is no obvious, simple answer to the question of what is causing amphi- bian declines? Complex interactions of several anthropogenic factors are probably at work, and understanding amphibian declines may thus serve as a model for understanding species declines in general. While we have fewer answers than we would like, there are six leading hypotheses that we sort into two classes. For class I hypotheses, alien species, over-exploitation and land use change, we have a good understanding of the ecological mechanisms underlying declines; these causes have affected amphibian populations negatively for more than a century. However, the question remains as to whether the magnitude of these negative effects increased in the 1980s, as scientists began to notice a global decline of amphibians. Further, remedies for these problems are not simple. For class II hypotheses, global change (including UV radiation and global climate change), contaminants and emerging infectious diseases we have a poor, but improving under- standing of how each might cause declines. Class II factors involve complex and subtle mechanistic underpinnings, with probable interactions among multiple ecological and evolutionary variables. They may also interact with class I hypotheses. Suspected mechanisms associated with class II hypotheses are relatively recent, dating from at least the middle of the 20th century. Did these causes act independently or in concert with pre- existing negative forces of class I hypotheses to increase the rate of amphibian declines to a level that drew global attention? We need more studies that connect the suspected mechanisms underlying both classes of hypotheses with quantitative changes in amphibian population sizes and species numbers. An important step forward in this task is clari- fying the hypotheses and conditions under which the various causes operate alone or together.

972 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Some of the genetic and genomic attributes of polyploids may have both biochemical and ecological benefits that contribute to the success ofpolyploid plants in nature.
Abstract: In 1950, G. Ledyard Stebbins devoted two chapters of his book Variation and Evolution in Plants (Columbia Univ. Press, New York) to polyploidy, one on occurrence and nature and one on distribution and significance. Fifty years later, many of the questions Stebbins posed have not been answered, and many new questions have arisen. In this paper, we review some of the genetic attributes of polyploids that have been suggested to account for the tremendous success of polyploid plants. Based on a limited number of studies, we conclude: (i) Polyploids, both individuals and populations, generally maintain higher levels of heterozygosity than do their diploid progenitors. (ii) Polyploids exhibit less inbreeding depression than do their diploid parents and can therefore tolerate higher levels of selfing; polyploid ferns indeed have higher levels of selfing than do their diploid parents, but polyploid angiosperms do not differ in outcrossing rates from their diploid parents. (iii) Most polyploid species are polyphyletic, having formed recurrently from genetically different diploid parents. This mode of formation incorporates genetic diversity from multiple progenitor populations into the polyploid “species”; thus, genetic diversity in polyploid species is much higher than expected by models of polyploid formation involving a single origin. (iv) Genome rearrangement may be a common attribute of polyploids, based on evidence from genome in situ hybridization (GISH), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, and chromosome mapping. (v) Several groups of plants may be ancient polyploids, with large regions of homologous DNA. These duplicated genes and genomes can undergo divergent evolution and evolve new functions. These genetic and genomic attributes of polyploids may have both biochemical and ecological benefits that contribute to the success of polyploids in nature.

970 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work reviews the current state of technology in terms of strain analysis using EBSD and the effects of both elastic and plastic strain on individual EBSD patterns will be considered.
Abstract: Since the automation of the electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) technique, EBSD systems have become commonplace in microscopy facilities within materials science and geology research laboratories around the world. The acceptance of the technique is primarily due to the capability of EBSD to aid the research scientist in understanding the crystallographic aspects of microstructure. There has been considerable interest in using EBSD to quantify strain at the submicron scale. To apply EBSD to the characterization of strain, it is important to understand what is practically possible and the underlying assumptions and limitations. This work reviews the current state of technology in terms of strain analysis using EBSD. First, the effects of both elastic and plastic strain on individual EBSD patterns will be considered. Second, the use of EBSD maps for characterizing plastic strain will be explored. Both the potential of the technique and its limitations will be discussed along with the sensitivity of various calculation and mapping parameters.

964 citations


Authors

Showing all 27183 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Anil K. Jain1831016192151
Martin Karplus163831138492
Herbert A. Simon157745194597
Suvadeep Bose154960129071
Rajesh Kumar1494439140830
Kevin Murphy146728120475
Jonathan D. G. Jones12941780908
Douglas E. Soltis12761267161
Peter W. Kalivas12342852445
Chris Somerville12228445742
Pamela S. Soltis12054361080
Yuehe Lin11864155399
Howard I. Maibach116182160765
Jizhong Zhou11576648708
Farshid Guilak11048041327
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

96% related

University of California, Davis
180K papers, 8M citations

95% related

Pennsylvania State University
196.8K papers, 8.3M citations

95% related

University of Wisconsin-Madison
237.5K papers, 11.8M citations

95% related

University of Florida
200K papers, 7.1M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202398
2022344
20212,786
20202,783
20192,691
20182,370