Institution
Wildlife Conservation Society
Nonprofit•New York, New York, United States•
About: Wildlife Conservation Society is a nonprofit organization based out in New York, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Biodiversity. The organization has 2245 authors who have published 4908 publications receiving 243858 citations. The organization is also known as: New York Zoological Society & WCS.
Topics: Population, Biodiversity, Coral reef, Threatened species, Animal ecology
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
State Street Corporation1, University of California, Santa Barbara2, University of Hawaii at Manoa3, Stanford University4, Arizona State University5, Wildlife Conservation Society6, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill7, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration8, Environmental Defense Fund9, Ocean Conservancy10, The Nature Conservancy11, University of Maine12, University of British Columbia13
TL;DR: This article developed an ecosystem-specific, multiscale spatial model to synthesize 17 global data sets of anthropogenic drivers of ecological change for 20 marine ecosystems and found that no area is unaffected by human influence and that a large fraction (41%) is strongly affected by multiple drivers.
Abstract: The management and conservation of the world's oceans require synthesis of spatial data on the distribution and intensity of human activities and the overlap of their impacts on marine ecosystems. We developed an ecosystem-specific, multiscale spatial model to synthesize 17 global data sets of anthropogenic drivers of ecological change for 20 marine ecosystems. Our analysis indicates that no area is unaffected by human influence and that a large fraction (41%) is strongly affected by multiple drivers. However, large areas of relatively little human impact remain, particularly near the poles. The analytical process and resulting maps provide flexible tools for regional and global efforts to allocate conservation resources; to implement ecosystem-based management; and to inform marine spatial planning, education, and basic research.
5,365 citations
••
TL;DR: Although estimates of the intensity and impact of edge effects in fragmented forests are urgently required, little can be done to ameliorate edge effects unless their mechanics are better understood.
Abstract: Edges are presumed to have deleterious consequences for the organisms that remain in forest fragments. However, there is substantial discrepancy among recent studies about the existence and intensity of edge effects. Most studies have focused on seeking simplistic and static patterns. Very few have tested mechanistic hypotheses or explored the factors that modulate edge effects. Consequently,studies are very site-specifci and their results cannot be generalized to produce a universal theory of edges. Although estimates of the intensity and impact of edge effects in fragmented forests are urgently required, little can be done to ameliorate edge effects unless their mechanics are better understood.
2,759 citations
••
University of Miami1, Wildlife Conservation Society2, Marine Sciences Research Center3, Scripps Institution of Oceanography4, University of Washington5, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science6, National Marine Fisheries Service7, University of California, Santa Cruz8, Royal School of Mines9, National Research Council10, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation11
TL;DR: Pikitch et al. as discussed by the authors describe the potential benefits of implementation of ecosystem-based fishery management that, in their view, far outweigh the difficulties of making the transition from a management system based on maximizing individual species.
Abstract: Ecosystem-based fishery management (EBFM) is a new direction for fishery management, essentially reversing the order of management priorities so that management starts with the ecosystem rather than a target species. EBFM aims to sustain healthy marine ecosystems and the fisheries they support.
Pikitch
et al .
describe the potential benefits of implementation of EBFM that, in their view, far outweigh the difficulties of making the transition from a management system based on maximizing individual species.
2,011 citations
••
Dalhousie University1, University of Washington2, University of California, San Diego3, University of Rhode Island4, University of California, Santa Barbara5, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration6, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation7, University of East Anglia8, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science9, Wellington Management Company10, Wildlife Conservation Society11, Stanford University12, University of New Hampshire13, University of British Columbia14
TL;DR: Current trends in world fisheries are analyzed from a fisheries and conservation perspective, finding that 63% of assessed fish stocks worldwide still require rebuilding, and even lower exploitation rates are needed to reverse the collapse of vulnerable species.
Abstract: After a long history of overexploitation, increasing efforts to restore marine ecosystems and rebuild fisheries are under way. Here, we analyze current trends from a fisheries and conservation perspective. In 5 of 10 well-studied ecosystems, the average exploitation rate has recently declined and is now at or below the rate predicted to achieve maximum sustainable yield for seven systems. Yet 63% of assessed fish stocks worldwide still require rebuilding, and even lower exploitation rates are needed to reverse the collapse of vulnerable species. Combined fisheries and conservation objectives can be achieved by merging diverse management actions, including catch restrictions, gear modification, and closed areas, depending on local context. Impacts of international fleets and the lack of alternatives to fishing complicate prospects for rebuilding fisheries in many poorer regions, highlighting the need for a global perspective on rebuilding marine resources.
2,009 citations
••
TL;DR: Advanced analysis topics covered include the use of multipliers to allow analysis of indirect surveys, the density surface modelling analysis engine for spatial and habitat modelling, and information about accessing the analysis engines directly from other software.
Abstract: Summary
1. Distance sampling is a widely used technique for estimating the size or density of biological populations. Many distance sampling designs and most analyses use the software Distance.
2. We briefly review distance sampling and its assumptions, outline the history, structure and capabilities of Distance, and provide hints on its use.
3. Good survey design is a crucial prerequisite for obtaining reliable results. Distance has a survey design engine, with a built-in geographic information system, that allows properties of different proposed designs to be examined via simulation, and survey plans to be generated.
4. A first step in analysis of distance sampling data is modelling the probability of detection. Distance contains three increasingly sophisticated analysis engines for this: conventional distance sampling, which models detection probability as a function of distance from the transect and assumes all objects at zero distance are detected; multiple-covariate distance sampling, which allows covariates in addition to distance; and mark–recapture distance sampling, which relaxes the assumption of certain detection at zero distance.
5. All three engines allow estimation of density or abundance, stratified if required, with associated measures of precision calculated either analytically or via the bootstrap.
6. Advanced analysis topics covered include the use of multipliers to allow analysis of indirect surveys (such as dung or nest surveys), the density surface modelling analysis engine for spatial and habitat modelling, and information about accessing the analysis engines directly from other software.
7.Synthesis and applications. Distance sampling is a key method for producing abundance and density estimates in challenging field conditions. The theory underlying the methods continues to expand to cope with realistic estimation situations. In step with theoretical developments, state-of-the-art software that implements these methods is described that makes the methods accessible to practising ecologists.
1,878 citations
Authors
Showing all 2254 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
David W. Macdonald | 111 | 1109 | 51334 |
John Hart | 108 | 1081 | 54283 |
Andrew P. Dobson | 98 | 322 | 44211 |
Tim R. McClanahan | 94 | 333 | 27849 |
Colin A. Chapman | 92 | 491 | 28217 |
Koji Nakanishi | 91 | 946 | 37048 |
Fernando Nottebohm | 90 | 155 | 26226 |
Claire Kremen | 85 | 190 | 41504 |
Peter Marler | 81 | 174 | 22070 |
David E. Wildt | 79 | 420 | 19974 |
Muhammad Iqbal | 77 | 961 | 23821 |
James E. M. Watson | 74 | 461 | 23362 |
Stuart Campbell | 69 | 313 | 18384 |
Joshua E. Cinner | 68 | 177 | 14384 |
Mauro Galetti | 67 | 275 | 17754 |