scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

World Bank

OtherWashington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
About: World Bank is a other organization based out in Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poverty. The organization has 7813 authors who have published 21594 publications receiving 1198361 citations. The organization is also known as: World Bank, WB & The World Bank.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The study used standardized patients recruited from the local community and trained to present consistent cases of illness to providers to measure quality, and found low overall levels of medical training among health care providers and adherence to clinical checklists.
Abstract: This article reports on the quality of care delivered by private and public providers of primary health care services in rural and urban India. To measure quality, the study used standardized patients recruited from the local community and trained to present consistent cases of illness to providers. We found low overall levels of medical training among health care providers; in rural Madhya Pradesh, for example, 67 percent of health care providers who were sampled reported no medical qualifications at all. What’s more, we found only small differences between trained and untrained doctors in such areas as adherence to clinical checklists. Correct diagnoses were rare, incorrect treatments were widely prescribed, and adherence to clinical checklists was higher in private than in public clinics. Our results suggest an urgent need to measure the quality of health care services systematically and to improve the quality of medical education and continuing education programs, among other policy changes.

344 citations

BookDOI
TL;DR: The authors found that empirical research strongly favors private ownership in competitive markets over a state-owned counterfactual, and that the choice confronting governments is between state ownership and privatization rather than between privatization and optimality.
Abstract: At the heart of the debate about public versus private ownership lie three questions: 1) Does competition matter more than ownership? 2) Are state enterprises more subject to welfare-reducing interventions by government than private firms are? 3) Do state enterprises suffer more from governance problems than private firms do? Even if the answers to these questions favor private ownership, the question must still be asked: Do distortions in the process of privatization mean that privatized firms perform worse than state enterprises? The author's review found greater ambiguity about the merits of privatization and private ownership in the theoretical literature than in the empirical literature. In most cases, empirical research strongly favors private ownership in competitive markets over a state-owned counterfactual (although construction of the counterfactual is itself a problem). Theory's ambiguity about ownership in monopoly markets seems better justified. Since the choice confronting governments is between state ownership and privatization rather than between privatization and optimality, theory has left a gap that empirical work has tried to fill. Further research is needed.

343 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a field experiment in Tanzania tested eight alternative methods to measure household consumption on a sample of 4,000 households and found significant differences between consumption reported by the benchmark personal diary and other diary and recall formats.

342 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide an overview of the recent international experience with active labor market programs (ALMPs) and focus on the impacts of ALMPs on the subsequent employment and earnings of participants.
Abstract: In this paper, the authors provide an overview of the recent international experience with active labor market programs (ALMPs). Basing the evidence on the growing body of program evaluations, it focuses on the impacts of ALMPs on the subsequent employment and earnings of participants. This paper provides an update to earlier assessments by incorporating the results of the more recent program evaluations. It also extends these previous reviews by explicitly considering the impacts of ALMPs in developing and transition countries. While most rigorous program evaluations continue to be undertaken in industrialized countries, this gives a significant number of evaluations from transition and, to a lesser extent, developing countries.

340 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Arne Drud1
TL;DR: The paper presents CONOPT, an optimization system for static and dynamic large-scale nonlinearly constrained optimization problems, based on the GRG algorithm, which uses sparse-matrix algorithms from linear programming, modified to deal with the nonlinearity and to take maximum advantage of the periodic structure in dynamic models.
Abstract: The paper presents CONOPT, an optimization system for static and dynamic large scale nonlinearly constrained optimization problems The system is based on the GRG algorithm All computations involving the Jacobian of the constraints use sparse matrix algorithm from linear programming modified to take optimal advantage of the nonlinearity The paper presents the main features of the system, especially the inversion routines and their data structures, the dynamic setting of tolerances in Newton's algorithm, and the user features in the overall packaging Computational experience with some medium to large models is presented

340 citations


Authors

Showing all 7881 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Joseph E. Stiglitz1641142152469
Barry M. Popkin15775190453
Dan J. Stein1421727132718
Asli Demirguc-Kunt13742978166
Elinor Ostrom126430104959
David Scott124156182554
Ross Levine122398108067
Barry Eichengreen11694951073
Martin Ravallion11557055380
Kenneth H. Mayer115135164698
Angus Deaton11036366325
Timothy Besley10336845988
Lawrence H. Summers10228558555
Shang-Jin Wei10141539112
Thorsten Beck9937362708
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
London School of Economics and Political Science
35K papers, 1.4M citations

89% related

National Bureau of Economic Research
34.1K papers, 2.8M citations

88% related

International Monetary Fund
20.1K papers, 737.5K citations

88% related

Economic Policy Institute
14.2K papers, 765.8K citations

87% related

Bocconi University
8.9K papers, 344.1K citations

87% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202330
202281
2021491
2020594
2019604
2018637