Institution
World Bank Institute
About: World Bank Institute is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Accountability & Free trade. The organization has 77 authors who have published 166 publications receiving 23488 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
•
TL;DR: The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) project as mentioned in this paper is a collection of six dimensions of governance starting in 1996: Voice and Accountability, Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Rule of Law, and Control of Corruption.
Abstract: This paper summarizes the methodology of the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) project, and related analytical issues. The WGI cover over 200 countries and territories, measuring six dimensions of governance starting in 1996: Voice and Accountability, Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Rule of Law, and Control of Corruption. The aggregate indicators are based on several hundred individual underlying variables, taken from a wide variety of existing data sources. The data reflect the views on governance of survey respondents and public, private, and NGO sector experts worldwide. The WGI also explicitly report margins of error accompanying each country estimate. These reflect the inherent difficulties in measuring governance using any kind of data. Even after taking these margins of error into account, the WGI permit meaningful cross-country and over-time comparisons.
3,879 citations
••
TL;DR: The 2009 update of the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) research project, covering 212 countries and territories and measuring six dimensions of governance between 1996 and 2008: Voice and Accountability, Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Rule of Law, and Control of Corruption as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: This paper reports on the 2009 update of the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) research project, covering 212 countries and territories and measuring six dimensions of governance between 1996 and 2008: Voice and Accountability, Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Rule of Law, and Control of Corruption. These aggregate indicators are based on hundreds of specific and disaggregated individual variables measuring various dimensions of governance, taken from 35 data sources provided by 33 different organizations. The data reflect the views on governance of public sector, private sector and NGO experts, as well as thousands of citizen and firm survey respondents worldwide. The authors also explicitly report the margins of error accompanying each country estimate. These reflect the inherent difficulties in measuring governance using any kind of data. They find that even after taking margins of error into account, the WGI permit meaningful cross-country comparisons as well as monitoring progress over time. The aggregate indicators, together with the disaggregated underlying indicators, are available at www.govindicators.org.
3,059 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the latest update of their aggregate governance indicators, together with new analysis of several issues related to the use of these measures, and suggest a simple rule of thumb for identifying statistically significant changes in country governance over time.
Abstract: The authors present the latest update of their aggregate governance indicators, together with new analysis of several issues related to the use of these measures. The governance indicators measure the following six dimensions of governance: (1) voice and accountability; (2) political instability and violence; (3) government effectiveness; (4) regulatory quality; (5) rule of law, and (6) control of corruption. They cover 209 countries and territories for 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002, and 2004. They are based on several hundred individual variables measuring perceptions of governance, drawn from 37 separate data sources constructed by 31 organizations. The authors present estimates of the six dimensions of governance for each period, as well as margins of error capturing the range of likely values for each country. These margins of error are not unique to perceptions-based measures of governance, but are an important feature of all efforts to measure governance, including objective indicators. In fact, the authors give examples of how individual objective measures provide an incomplete picture of even the quite particular dimensions of governance that they are intended to measure. The authors also analyze in detail changes over time in their estimates of governance; provide a framework for assessing the statistical significance of changes in governance; and suggest a simple rule of thumb for identifying statistically significant changes in country governance over time. The ability to identify significant changes in governance over time is much higher for aggregate indicators than for any individual indicator. While the authors find that the quality of governance in a number of countries has changed significantly (in both directions), they also provide evidence suggesting that there are no trends, for better or worse, in global averages of governance. Finally, they interpret the strong observed correlation between income and governance, and argue against recent efforts to apply a discount to governance performance in low-income countries.
1,849 citations
••
TL;DR: Kaufmann, Kraay and Zoido-Lobat as mentioned in this paper presented estimates of six dimensions of governance covering 199 countries and territories for four time periods: 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002.
Abstract: The authors present estimates of six dimensions of governance covering 199 countries and territories for four time periods: 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002. These indicators are based on several hundred individual variables measuring perceptions of governance, drawn from 25 separate data sources constructed by 18 different organizations. The authors assign these individual measures of governance to categories capturing key dimensions of governance and use an unobserved components model to construct six aggregate governance indicators in each of the four periods. They present the point estimates of the dimensions of governance as well as the margins of errors for each country for the four periods. The governance indicators reported here are an update and expansion of previous research work on indicators initiated in 1998 (Kaufmann, Kraay, and Zoido-Lobat 1999a,b and 2002). The authors also address various methodological issues, including the interpretation and use of the data given the estimated margins of errors.
1,439 citations
••
Harvard University1, World Health Organization2, University of Oxford3, New York University4, Cayetano Heredia University5, World Bank Institute6, National Institutes of Health7, World Bank8, University of Cape Town9, Makerere University10, University of Chile11, Thailand Ministry of Public Health12
TL;DR: This analysis of the global workforce proposes that mobilisation and strengthening of human resources for health, neglected yet critical, is central to combating health crises in some of the world's poorest countries and for building sustainable health systems in all countries.
1,402 citations
Authors
Showing all 77 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Bernard Hoekman | 61 | 517 | 15556 |
Zhi Wang | 49 | 418 | 10488 |
Shahidur R. Khandker | 43 | 118 | 11982 |
Gilles Dussault | 30 | 119 | 4749 |
Anwar Shah | 30 | 120 | 3649 |
Shahid Yusuf | 29 | 96 | 3747 |
Philip Musgrove | 25 | 65 | 9321 |
Massimo Mastruzzi | 24 | 34 | 17506 |
Carsten Fink | 24 | 57 | 2485 |
Riccardo Pelizzo | 22 | 139 | 1497 |
Vinod Thomas | 18 | 60 | 1636 |
Anwar Shah | 16 | 64 | 1248 |
Audrey Sacks | 16 | 31 | 1386 |
Samuel Munzele Maimbo | 15 | 34 | 1251 |
Abdo S. Yazbeck | 15 | 31 | 1432 |