scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

World Health Organization

GovernmentIslamabad, Pakistan
About: World Health Organization is a government organization based out in Islamabad, Pakistan. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Public health. The organization has 13330 authors who have published 22232 publications receiving 1322023 citations. The organization is also known as: World Health Organisation & WHO.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Wildlife and exotic pets represent large reservoirs for emerging zoonoses and need to be managed more effectively to protect them from extinction.
Abstract: Most emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic; wildlife constitutes a large and often unknown reservoir. Wildlife can also be a source for reemergence of previously controlled zoonoses. Although the discovery of such zoonoses is often related to better diagnostic tools, the leading causes of their emergence are human behavior and modifications to natural habitats (expansion of human populations and their encroachment on wildlife habitat), changes in agricultural practices, and globalization of trade. However, other factors include wildlife trade and translocation, live animal and bushmeat markets, consumption of exotic foods, development of ecotourism, access to petting zoos, and ownership of exotic pets. To reduce risk for emerging zoonoses, the public should be educated about the risks associated with wildlife, bushmeat, and exotic pet trades; and proper surveillance systems should be implemented.

428 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
17 Mar 2016-BMJ
TL;DR: This paper presents the resulting 16 item checklist and a detailed explanation and elaboration for each item, with illustrative reporting examples, and expects that the use of these guidelines will standardise thequality of mHealth evidence reporting, and indirectly improve the quality of m health evidence.
Abstract: To improve the completeness of reporting of mobile health (mHealth) interventions, the WHO mHealth Technical Evidence Review Group developed the mHealth evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist. The development process for mERA consisted of convening an expert group to recommend an appropriate approach, convening a global expert review panel for checklist development, and pilot testing the checklist. The guiding principle for the development of these criteria was to identify a minimum set of information needed to define what the mHealth intervention is (content), where it is being implemented (context), and how it was implemented (technical features), to support replication of the intervention. This paper presents the resulting 16 item checklist and a detailed explanation and elaboration for each item, with illustrative reporting examples. Through widespread adoption, we expect that the use of these guidelines will standardise the quality of mHealth evidence reporting, and indirectly improve the quality of mHealth evidence.

427 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Ryan M Barber1, Nancy Fullman1, Reed J D Sorensen1, Thomas J. Bollyky  +757 moreInstitutions (314)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors use the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) to improve and expand the quantification of personal health-care access and quality for 195 countries and territories from 1990 to 2015.

427 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
18 Nov 2000-BMJ
TL;DR: Interpregnancy intervals less than 6 months and longer than 59 months are associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes.
Abstract: Objective: To study the impact of interpregnancy interval on maternal morbidity and mortality. Design: Retrospective cross sectional study with data from the Perinatal Information System database of the Latin American Centre for Perinatology and Human Development, Montevideo, Uruguay. Setting: Latin America and the Caribbean, 1985-97. Participants: 456 889 parous women delivering singleton infants. Main outcome measures: Crude and adjusted odds ratios of the effects of short and long interpregnancy intervals on maternal death, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, third trimester bleeding, premature rupture of membranes, postpartum haemorrhage, puerperal endometritis, and anaemia. Results: Short ( 59 months) interpregnancy intervals were observed for 2.8% and 19.5% of women, respectively. After adjustment for major confounding factors, compared with those conceiving at 18 to 23 months after a previous birth, women with interpregnancy intervals of 5 months or less had higher risks for maternal death (odds ratio 2.54; 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 5.38), third trimester bleeding (1.73; 1.42 to 2.24), premature rupture of membranes (1.72; 1.53 to 1.93), puerperal endometritis (1.33; 1.22 to 1.45), and anaemia (1.30; 1.18 to 1.43). Compared with women with interpregnancy intervals of 18 to 23 months, women with interpregnancy intervals longer than 59 months had significantly increased risks of pre-eclampsia (1.83; 1.72 to 1.94) and eclampsia (1.80; 1.38 to 2.32). Conclusions: Interpregnancy intervals less than 6 months and longer than 59 months are associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes.

427 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Recommendations vary by transmission pattern, pandemic phase, and disease severity, so as to not overwhelm efforts to protect against disease severity.
Abstract: The World Health Organization’s recommended pandemic influenza interventions, based on limited data, vary by transmission pattern, pandemic phase, and illness severity and extent. In the pandemic alert period, recommendations include isolation of patients and quarantine of contacts, accompanied by antiviral therapy. During the pandemic period, the focus shifts to delaying spread and reducing effects through population-based measures. Ill persons should remain home when they first became symptomatic, but forced isolation and quarantine are ineffective and impractical. If the pandemic is severe, social distancing measures such as school closures should be considered. Nonessential domestic travel to affected areas should be deferred. Hand and respiratory hygiene should be routine; mask use should be based on setting and risk, and contaminated household surfaces should be disinfected. Additional research and field assessments during pandemics are essential to update recommendations. Legal authority and procedures for implementing interventions should be understood in advance and should respect cultural differences and human rights.

425 citations


Authors

Showing all 13385 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Christopher J L Murray209754310329
Michael Marmot1931147170338
Didier Raoult1733267153016
Alan D. Lopez172863259291
Zulfiqar A Bhutta1651231169329
Simon I. Hay165557153307
Robert G. Webster15884390776
Ali H. Mokdad156634160599
Matthias Egger152901184176
Paolo Boffetta148145593876
Jean Bousquet145128896769
Igor Rudan142658103659
Holger J. Schünemann141810113169
Richard M. Myers134496137791
Majid Ezzati133443137171
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
82.5K papers, 4.4M citations

92% related

Public Health Research Institute
8.1K papers, 276.9K citations

91% related

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
8.6K papers, 325K citations

90% related

Norwegian Institute of Public Health
8.1K papers, 362.8K citations

90% related

University of London
88K papers, 4M citations

89% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202319
202279
20211,792
20201,612
20191,402
20181,360