scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Yale Cancer Center

FacilityNew Haven, Connecticut, United States
About: Yale Cancer Center is a facility organization based out in New Haven, Connecticut, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Population. The organization has 708 authors who have published 1609 publications receiving 78697 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Among previously untreated patients with metastatic melanoma, nivolumab alone or combined with ipilimumab resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than ipILimumab alone, and in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors, the combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade was more effective than either agent alone.
Abstract: The median progression-free survival was 11.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.9 to 16.7) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, as compared with 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 3.4) with ipilimumab (hazard ratio for death or disease progression, 0.42; 99.5% CI, 0.31 to 0.57; P<0.001), and 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.3 to 9.5) with nivolumab (hazard ratio for the comparison with ipilimumab, 0.57; 99.5% CI, 0.43 to 0.76; P<0.001). In patients with tumors positive for the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1), the median progression-free survival was 14.0 months in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and in the nivolumab group, but in patients with PD-L1–negative tumors, progression-free survival was longer with the combination therapy than with nivolumab alone (11.2 months [95% CI, 8.0 to not reached] vs. 5.3 months [95% CI, 2.8 to 7.1]). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 16.3% of the patients in the nivolumab group, 55.0% of those in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group, and 27.3% of those in the ipilimumab group. CONCLUSIONS Among previously untreated patients with metastatic melanoma, nivolumab alone or combined with ipilimumab resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than ipilimumab alone. In patients with PD-L1–negative tumors, the combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade was more effective than either agent alone. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 067 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01844505.)

6,318 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Michael S. Lawrence1, Petar Stojanov1, Petar Stojanov2, Paz Polak3, Paz Polak2, Paz Polak1, Gregory V. Kryukov1, Gregory V. Kryukov2, Gregory V. Kryukov3, Kristian Cibulskis1, Andrey Sivachenko1, Scott L. Carter1, Chip Stewart1, Craig H. Mermel1, Craig H. Mermel2, Steven A. Roberts4, Adam Kiezun1, Peter S. Hammerman2, Peter S. Hammerman1, Aaron McKenna1, Aaron McKenna5, Yotam Drier, Lihua Zou1, Alex H. Ramos1, Trevor J. Pugh2, Trevor J. Pugh1, Nicolas Stransky1, Elena Helman1, Elena Helman6, Jaegil Kim1, Carrie Sougnez1, Lauren Ambrogio1, Elizabeth Nickerson1, Erica Shefler1, Maria L. Cortes1, Daniel Auclair1, Gordon Saksena1, Douglas Voet1, Michael S. Noble1, Daniel DiCara1, Pei Lin1, Lee Lichtenstein1, David I. Heiman1, Timothy Fennell1, Marcin Imielinski2, Marcin Imielinski1, Bryan Hernandez1, Eran Hodis2, Eran Hodis1, Sylvan C. Baca2, Sylvan C. Baca1, Austin M. Dulak2, Austin M. Dulak1, Jens G. Lohr2, Jens G. Lohr1, Dan A. Landau1, Dan A. Landau2, Dan A. Landau7, Catherine J. Wu2, Jorge Melendez-Zajgla, Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda, Amnon Koren2, Amnon Koren1, Steven A. McCarroll1, Steven A. McCarroll2, Jaume Mora8, Ryan S. Lee9, Ryan S. Lee2, Brian D. Crompton2, Brian D. Crompton9, Robert C. Onofrio1, Melissa Parkin1, Wendy Winckler1, Kristin G. Ardlie1, Stacey Gabriel1, Charles W. M. Roberts9, Charles W. M. Roberts2, Jaclyn A. Biegel10, Kimberly Stegmaier2, Kimberly Stegmaier9, Kimberly Stegmaier1, Adam J. Bass2, Adam J. Bass1, Levi A. Garraway2, Levi A. Garraway1, Matthew Meyerson1, Matthew Meyerson2, Todd R. Golub, Dmitry A. Gordenin4, Shamil R. Sunyaev2, Shamil R. Sunyaev3, Shamil R. Sunyaev1, Eric S. Lander6, Eric S. Lander2, Eric S. Lander1, Gad Getz2, Gad Getz1 
11 Jul 2013-Nature
TL;DR: A fundamental problem with cancer genome studies is described: as the sample size increases, the list of putatively significant genes produced by current analytical methods burgeons into the hundreds and the list includes many implausible genes, suggesting extensive false-positive findings that overshadow true driver events.
Abstract: Major international projects are underway that are aimed at creating a comprehensive catalogue of all the genes responsible for the initiation and progression of cancer. These studies involve the sequencing of matched tumour-normal samples followed by mathematical analysis to identify those genes in which mutations occur more frequently than expected by random chance. Here we describe a fundamental problem with cancer genome studies: as the sample size increases, the list of putatively significant genes produced by current analytical methods burgeons into the hundreds. The list includes many implausible genes (such as those encoding olfactory receptors and the muscle protein titin), suggesting extensive false-positive findings that overshadow true driver events. We show that this problem stems largely from mutational heterogeneity and provide a novel analytical methodology, MutSigCV, for resolving the problem. We apply MutSigCV to exome sequences from 3,083 tumour-normal pairs and discover extraordinary variation in mutation frequency and spectrum within cancer types, which sheds light on mutational processes and disease aetiology, and in mutation frequency across the genome, which is strongly correlated with DNA replication timing and also with transcriptional activity. By incorporating mutational heterogeneity into the analyses, MutSigCV is able to eliminate most of the apparent artefactual findings and enable the identification of genes truly associated with cancer.

4,411 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Nivolumab led to a greater proportion of patients achieving an objective response and fewer toxic effects than with alternative available chemotherapy regimens for patients with advanced melanoma that has progressed after ipilimumab or ipilicumab and a BRAF inhibitor.
Abstract: Summary Background Nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody, can result in durable responses in patients with melanoma who have progressed after ipilimumab and BRAF inhibitors. We assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab compared with investigator's choice of chemotherapy (ICC) as a second-line or later-line treatment in patients with advanced melanoma. Methods In this randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients at 90 sites in 14 countries. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had unresectable or metastatic melanoma, and progressed after ipilimumab, or ipilimumab and a BRAF inhibitor if they were BRAF V 600 mutation-positive. Participating investigators randomly assigned (with an interactive voice response system) patients 2:1 to receive an intravenous infusion of nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or ICC (dacarbazine 1000 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks or paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 combined with carboplatin area under the curve 6 every 3 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxic effects. We stratified randomisation by BRAF mutation status, tumour expression of PD-L1, and previous best overall response to ipilimumab. We used permuted blocks (block size of six) within each stratum. Primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who had an objective response and overall survival. Treatment was given open-label, but those doing tumour assessments were masked to treatment assignment. We assessed objective responses per-protocol after 120 patients had been treated with nivolumab and had a minimum follow-up of 24 weeks, and safety in all patients who had had at least one dose of treatment. The trial is closed and this is the first interim analysis, reporting the objective response primary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01721746. Findings Between Dec 21, 2012, and Jan 10, 2014, we screened 631 patients, randomly allocating 272 patients to nivolumab and 133 to ICC. Confirmed objective responses were reported in 38 (31·7%, 95% CI 23·5–40·8) of the first 120 patients in the nivolumab group versus five (10·6%, 3·5–23·1) of 47 patients in the ICC group. Grade 3–4 adverse events related to nivolumab included increased lipase (three [1%] of 268 patients), increased alanine aminotransferase, anaemia, and fatigue (two [1%] each); for ICC, these included neutropenia (14 [14%] of 102), thrombocytopenia (six [6%]), and anaemia (five [5%]). We noted grade 3–4 drug-related serious adverse events in 12 (5%) nivolumab-treated patients and nine (9%) patients in the ICC group. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Interpretation Nivolumab led to a greater proportion of patients achieving an objective response and fewer toxic effects than with alternative available chemotherapy regimens for patients with advanced melanoma that has progressed after ipilimumab or ipilimumab and a BRAF inhibitor. Nivolumab represents a new treatment option with clinically meaningful durable objective responses in a population of high unmet need. Funding Bristol-Myers Squibb.

2,260 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
27 Nov 2014-Nature
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that tumours expressing PD-L1-positive tumour-infiltrating immune cells had particularly high response rates, and patients with UBC, who are often older and have a higher incidence of renal impairment, may be better able to tolerate MPDL3280A versus chemotherapy.
Abstract: There have been no major advances for the treatment of metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) in the last 30 years. Chemotherapy is still the standard of care. Patient outcomes, especially for those in whom chemotherapy is not effective or is poorly tolerated, remain poor. One hallmark of UBC is the presence of high rates of somatic mutations. These alterations may enhance the ability of the host immune system to recognize tumour cells as foreign owing to an increased number of antigens. However, these cancers may also elude immune surveillance and eradication through the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1; also called CD274 or B7-H1) in the tumour microenvironment. Therefore, we examined the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A, a systemic cancer immunotherapy, for the treatment of metastatic UBC. MPDL3280A is a high-affinity engineered human anti-PD-L1 monoclonal immunoglobulin-G1 antibody that inhibits the interaction of PD-L1 with PD-1 (PDCD1) and B7.1 (CD80). Because PD-L1 is expressed on activated T cells, MPDL3280A was engineered with a modification in the Fc domain that eliminates antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity at clinically relevant doses to prevent the depletion of T cells expressing PD-L1. Here we show that MPDL3280A has noteworthy activity in metastatic UBC. Responses were often rapid, with many occurring at the time of the first response assessment (6 weeks) and nearly all were ongoing at the data cutoff. This phase I expansion study, with an adaptive design that allowed for biomarker-positive enriched cohorts, demonstrated that tumours expressing PD-L1-positive tumour-infiltrating immune cells had particularly high response rates. Moreover, owing to the favourable toxicity profile, including a lack of renal toxicity, patients with UBC, who are often older and have a higher incidence of renal impairment, may be better able to tolerate MPDL3280A versus chemotherapy. These results suggest that MPDL3280A may have an important role in treating UBC-the drug received breakthrough designation status by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in June 2014.

2,101 citations


Authors

Showing all 725 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Richard A. Flavell2311328205119
Donna Spiegelman15280485428
Charles S. Fuchs14888680802
Jun Lu135152699767
James Chih-Hsin Yang12760690323
Dan L. Longo12569756085
Lieping Chen12042173624
Richard Bucala11959554607
Richard P. Lifton11942163427
Reinhard Dummer116101477737
Joan A. Steitz11331846190
Josep Tabernero11180368982
William L. Jorgensen10858695112
Peter Salovey10829756135
David L. Rimm10458141848
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
92.5K papers, 4.7M citations

95% related

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
65.3K papers, 4.4M citations

95% related

Roswell Park Cancer Institute
19.5K papers, 944.8K citations

94% related

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
30.9K papers, 2.2M citations

91% related

Netherlands Cancer Institute
17.2K papers, 1.1M citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202311
202228
2021151
2020183
2019192
2018146