Showing papers in "arXiv: Astrophysics in 2018"
TL;DR: In this article, the authors performed a radiation hydrodynamics cosmological simulation to study the growth of "normal" black holes in the high redshift universe and found that the stunted growth of MBH is a consequence of supernovae in tandem with MBH feedback which drive large outflows and evacuate the gas from MBH vicinity.
Abstract: Understanding the growth of high redshift massive black holes (MBHs) is a problem of great astrophysical interest. The most luminous quasars at $z>6$ are frequently observed but they represent only the tip of the iceberg as the majority of the low luminosity AGN population remains undetected. In the present study, we perform a radiation hydrodynamics cosmological simulation to study the growth of "normal" black holes in the high redshift universe. In our simulation we model the formation of Pop III and Pop II stars along with their chemical, mechanical and radiative feedback. We consider both UV and X-ray emission from an accreting BH to simulate its radiative feedback. The selected halo has a mass of $\rm 3 \times 10^{10}~M_{\odot}$ at $z=7.5$ and we turn on radiative feedback from a MBH seed of $\rm 10^5~M_{\odot}$ along with in-situ star formation at $z=12$ when the halo mass reaches well above the atomic cooling limit. We find that the MBH accretes only about 2200 $\rm M_{\odot}$ during 320 Myr and the average mass accretion onto the MBH is a few times $\rm 10^{-6}~M_{\odot}/yr$. Our results suggest that the stunted growth of MBH is a consequence of supernovae in tandem with MBH feedback which drive large outflows and evacuate the gas from MBH vicinity. This may explain why a population of low luminosity AGN has not been detected so-far at $z>6$; the large contrast between the star formation rate and the MBH accretion rate may make then hard to detect even in upcoming deep surveys.
356 citations
TL;DR: In this article, a neural network was used to classify lightcurves from other forms of variability, such as eruptive, pulsating, cataclysmic and eclipsing variable stars.
Abstract: This paper pioneers the use of neural networks to provide a fast and automatic way to classify lightcurves in massive photometric datasets. As an example, we provide a working neural network that can distinguish microlensing lightcurves from other forms of variability, such as eruptive, pulsating, cataclysmic and eclipsing variable stars. The network has five input neurons, a hidden layer of five neurons and one output neuron. The five input variables for the network are extracted by spectral analysis from the lightcurve datapoints and are optimised for the identification of a single, symmetric, microlensing bump. The output of the network is the posterior probability of microlensing. The committee of neural networks successfully passes tests on noisy data taken by the MACHO collaboration. When used to process 5000 lightcurves on a typical tile towards the bulge, the network cleanly identifies the single microlensing event. When fed with a sub-sample of 36 lightcurves identified by the MACHO collaboration as microlensing, the network corroborates this verdict in the case of 27 events, but classifies the remaining 9 events as other forms of variability. For some of these discrepant events, it looks as though there are secondary bumps or the bump is noisy or not properly contained. Neural networks naturally allow for the possibility of novelty detection -- that is, new or unexpected phenomena which we may want to follow up. The advantages of neural networks for microlensing rate calculations, as well as the future developments of massive variability surveys, are both briefly discussed.
55 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a color-magnitude diagram of the Sandage-96 stellar cluster is presented, which shows the dominant blue continuum from the cluster stars shortward of 6000 A as well as strong SN nebular emission lines redward.
Abstract: The bright supernova 2004dj occurred within the young massive stellar cluster Sandage-96 in a spiral arm of NGC 2403, close to other star-forming complexes. New multi-wavelength observations obtained with several ground-based- and space telescopes are combined to study the radiation from Sandage-96 after SN 2004dj faded away. The late-time light curves show that Sandage-96 started to dominate the flux in the optical bands after September, 2006 (+800 days after explosion). The optical fluxes are equal to the pre-explosion ones, suggesting that Sandage-96 has survived the explosion without significant changes in its stellar population. An optical Keck-spectrum obtained at +900 days after explosion shows the dominant blue continuum from the cluster stars shortward of 6000 A as well as strong SN nebular emission lines redward. The integrated SED of the cluster has been extended into the UV-region by archival XMM-Newton and new Swift observations, and compared with theoretical models. The outer parts of the cluster have been resolved by HST allowing the construction of a color-magnitude diagram. The fitting of the cluster SED with theoretical isochrones results in two possible solutions with ages being 9+/-1 Myr and 30+/-10 Myr, depending on the assumed metallicity and the theoretical model family. The isochrone fitting of the color-magnitude diagram indicates that the outer part of the cluster consists of stars having an age dispersion of 16 < t < 63 Myr, which is similar to that of nearby field stars. This age discrepancy may be resolved by the hypothesis that the outskirt of Sandage-96 is contaminated by stars captured from the field during cluster formation. The young age of Sandage-96 and the comparison of its pre- and post-explosion SEDs suggest a progenitor mass of 15 < or equal to M(sub prog) < 25 Stellar Mass.
51 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the optical depth to the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) of the MACHO collaboration was estimated to be between 0.3 x 10−7 and 0.5×10−7.
Abstract: Using neural networks, Belokurov, Evans & Le Du (2003, 2004) showed that 7 out of the 29 microlensing candidates towards the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) of the MACHO collaboration are consistent with blended microlensing and added Gaussian noise. They then estimated the microlensing optical depth to the LMC to be between 0.3 x 10^{-7} and 0.5 x 10^{-7}, lower by about a factor of two than that found by the MACHO collaboration. There has been a recent independent claim of a low optical depth to the LMC by the EROS collaboration, who find 0.15 x 10^{-7} from 3 candidates (Tisserand et al 2006). Griest & Thomas (2005) have contested our calculations. Unfortunately, their paper contains a number of scientific misrepresentations of our work. We stand by our application of neural networks to microlensing searches and believe it to be a technique of great promise. Rather, the main cause of the disparity between Griest & Thomas and Belokurov et al. lies in the very different datasets through which these investigators look for microlensing events. We don't exclude the possibility that some of our non-microlensing designations may change with access to clean data. Whilst not everything is understood about the microlensing datasets towards the LMC, the latest downward revisions of the optical depth means that Griest & Thomas' microlensing puzzle is a roughly 1 sigma effect. Efficiency calculations can correct for the effects of false negatives, but they cannot correct for the effects of false positives (variable stars that are mistaken for microlensing). Therefore, the best strategy in a microlensing experiment is to eschew a decision boundary altogether. Rather, each lightcurve should be assigned a probability and the microlensing rate calculated by summing over the probabilities of all such lightcurves.
2 citations