scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers in "Canadian Journal of Political Science in 2010"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors show that immigration can have a negative effect on social trust, organizational membership and political engagement, but that institutional arrangements shape this relationship in systematic ways, and conclude that there is no general link between immigration-generated diversity and collective-mindedness.
Abstract: . This article is an attempt to qualify existing evidence that increasing diversity is detrimental to a vibrant civil society. We focus specifically on immigration-generated diversity, and argue that while it may have negative effects on some specific civic and political outcomes in some contexts, these effects vary widely across advanced democracies. Our argument rests on analysis of a cross-national, cross-sectional time-series dataset that brings together individual-level World Values Survey data with country-level variables. With these data, we track within-country changes over time in trust and engagement. We show that immigration can have a negative effect on social trust, organizational membership and political engagement, but that institutional arrangements shape this relationship in systematic ways. In more economically equal societies and in more multicultural countries (where cultural minorities are recognized and accommodated), the negative effects of immigration on trust and engagement are mitigated or even reversed. We conclude that there is no general link between immigration-generated diversity and collective-mindedness. Rather, the direction and strength of the relationship depend on institutional and policy contexts.Resume. Cet article vise a nuancer les preuves existantes que la diversite croissante porte prejudice a une societe civile dynamique. Nous nous concentrons particulierement sur la diversite produite par l'immigration. Nous soutenons que meme si elle peut exercer une influence negative sur quelques indices dans certains contextes, ces effets varient considerablement selon le pays examine parmi les democraties avancees. Notre argument repose sur l'analyse d'un ensemble de donnees multinational, transversal et longitudinal qui rassemble des donnees au niveau individuel du World Values Survey avec des variables au niveau des pays. Au moyen de ces donnees, nous examinons les changements survenus a l'interieur des pays, au fil du temps, sur le plan de la confiance et de l'engagement. Nous montrons que l'immigration peut avoir un effet negatif sur la confiance sociale, l'adhesion a des organisations et l'engagement politique, mais que les arrangements institutionnels influencent cette relation de manieres systematiques. Dans les societes plus economiquement egales et dans les pays plus multiculturels (ou les minorites culturelles sont reconnues et accommodees), les effets negatifs de l'immigration sur la confiance et l'engagement sont attenues, voire inverses. Nous concluons qu'il n'y a aucun lien general entre la diversite produite par l'immigration et l'esprit collectif. La direction et la force de la relation entre les deux dependent plutot des politiques et des contextes institutionnels.

231 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a comparative analysis of the relationship between neighborhood diversity and social capital is presented, showing that the negative relationship is apparent for minority groups but not Whites, but this is mainly attributable to other neighbourhood characteristics.
Abstract: . A number of scholars have noted a negative relationship between ethnic diversity and social capital or social trust, especially in the US. Evidence from other countries has been more mixed and sometimes contradictory. In this paper we provide the first Anglo-American comparative analysis of the relationship between neighbourhood diversity and social capital, and show how this relationship varies across ethnic categories. We apply multilevel structural equation models to individual level data from the 2000 Citizen Benchmark Survey for the US and the 2005 Citizenship Survey for Great Britain. The findings suggest that while for attitudinal social capital among Whites the negative underlying relationship with diversity is apparent in both countries, the effect is much weaker or reversed for minority groups. For structural social capital the negative relationship is apparent for minorities but not Whites, but this is mainly attributable to other neighbourhood characteristics.Resume. Un certain nombre d'universitaires ont note une relation negative entre la diversite ethnique et le capital social ou la confiance sociale, surtout aux Etats-Unis. D'autres pays, par contre, offrent des constats plus mitiges et parfois contradictoires. Dans cet article, nous presentons la premiere analyse comparative anglo-americaine de la relation entre la diversite du voisinage et le capital social et nous demontrons comment cette relation varie selon les categories ethniques. Nous appliquons des modelisations par equation structurelle a multiniveaux a des donnees de niveau individuel provenant du Citizen Benchmark Survey de 2000 pour les Etats-Unis et du Citizenship Survey de 2005 pour la Grande-Bretagne. Les resultats demontrent que si, pour le capital social attitudinal, la relation fondamentale negative avec la diversite est evidente parmi les Blancs dans les deux pays, l'effet est cependant beaucoup plus faible ou renverse pour les groupes minoritaires. En ce qui concerne le capital social structurel, la relation negative est evidente pour les minorites, mais pas pour les Blancs, mais cette situation est principalement attribuable a d'autres caracteristiques du voisinage.

120 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article examined the role of national identity in sustaining public support for the welfare state and found that identity plays a narrower role than existing theories of liberal nationalism suggest and that the mechanisms through which it works are different.
Abstract: . This paper examines the role of national identity in sustaining public support for the welfare state. Liberal nationalist theorists argue that social justice will always be easier to achieve in states with strong national identities, which, they contend, can both mitigate opposition to redistribution among high-income earners and reduce any corroding effects of ethnic diversity resulting from immigration. We test these propositions with Canadian data from the Equality, Security and Community survey. We conclude that national identity does increase support for the welfare state among the affluent majority of Canadians and that it helps to protect the welfare state from toxic effects of cultural suspicion. However, we also find that identity plays a narrower role than existing theories of liberal nationalism suggest and that the mechanisms through which it works are different. This leads us to suggest an alternative theory of the relationship between national identity and the welfare state, one that suggests that the relationship is highly contingent, reflecting distinctive features of the history and national narratives of each country. National identity may not have any general tendency to strengthen support for redistribution, but it may do so for those aspects of the welfare state seen as having played a particularly important role in building the nation or in enabling it to overcome particular challenges or crises. Resume. Cet article examine le role de l'identite nationale en matiere d'appui populaire a l'Etat-providence. Les theoriciens du nationalisme liberal soutiennent que la justice sociale sera toujours plus facile a realiser dans les Etats ayant une forte identite nationale, laquelle, selon eux, peut a la fois attenuer l'opposition a la redistribution chez les personnes a revenu eleve et reduire les effets corrosifs de la diversite ethnique engendree par l'immigration. Nous evaluons ces propositions a la lumiere des donnees canadiennes de l'Etude sur l'egalite, la securite et la communaute. Nous concluons que l'identite nationale augmente effectivement l'appui envers l'Etat-providence parmi les Canadiens fortunes de la majorite, et qu'elle aide a proteger l'Etat-providence contre les effets toxiques de la suspicion culturelle. Cependant, nous constatons egalement que l'identite joue un role plus restreint que ne le suggerent les theories existantes du nationalisme liberal et que ses mecanismes de fonctionnement sont differents. Cela nous amene a proposer une autre theorie de la relation entre l'identite nationale et l'Etat-providence, une theorie selon laquelle cette relation est fortement contingente et reflete les caracteristiques propres de l'histoire et de la tradition nationale de chaque pays. L'identite nationale n'a peut-etre, en soi, aucune tendance generale a renforcer l'appui a la redistribution, mais elle peut le faire pour les aspects de l'Etat-providence consideres comme ayant joue un role particulierement important dans l'edification de la nation, ou lui ayant permis de surmonter des crises ou des defis particuliers.

116 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors examined the relationship between ethnic diversity and public support for social programs in Canada and found that there is little tension between diversity and support for the welfare state in Canada, and that ethnic diversity is not eroding support for welfare state.
Abstract: . There is a widespread fear in many western nations that ethnic diversity is eroding support for the welfare state. This article examines such fears in the Canadian context. In-depth analysis of public attitudes finds remarkably little tension between ethnic diversity and public support for social programs in Canada. At first glance, then, the country seems to demonstrate the political viability of a multicultural welfare state. But this pattern reflects distinctive features of the institutional context within which public attitudes evolve. The Canadian policy regime has forestalled tension between diversity and redistribution by diverting adjustment pressures from the welfare state, absorbing some of them in other parts of the policy regime, and nurturing a more inclusive form of identity. These institutional buffers are thinning, however, potentially increasing the danger of greater tension between diversity and redistribution in the years to come.Resume. On craint generalement dans de nombreux pays occidentaux que l'immigration et la diversite ethnique de plus en plus grande soient en train d'eroder l'appui accorde a l'Etat-providence. Cet article porte sur de telles inquietudes au sein du Canada. Une analyse approfondie des attitudes du public devoile qu'il existe remarquablement peu de tension entre la diversite ethnique et l'appui du public a l'endroit des programmes sociaux du Canada. A premiere vue, le pays semble donc demontrer la viabilite politique d'un Etat-providence multiculturel. Mais cette tendance reflete les traits distinctifs du contexte institutionnel au sein duquel evoluent les attitudes du public. Le regime de politiques canadiennes fait echec a la tension entre la diversite et la redistribution en soustrayant de l'Etat-providence diverses pressions d'ajustement et en favorisant une forme d'identite plus inclusive. Certains de ces mecanismes de tampon institutionnels disparaissent progressivement, ce qui peut accroitre le danger d'une tension accrue entre la diversite et la redistribution dans les annees a venir.

108 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Will Kymlicka1
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider the available evidence, empirically testing the liberal multiculturalism hypothesis, both in Canada and cross-nationally, and examine the preuve disponible tout en evaluant empiriquement l'hypothese du multiculturalisme liberal.
Abstract: . For much of the 1990s, the academic literature on multiculturalism was heavily normative, dominated by political philosophers who developed idealized theories of a distinctly liberal–democratic form of multicultural citizenship. This “liberal multiculturalism hypothesis”—the notion that multiculturalism policies can be adopted without jeopardizing core liberal–democratic values—has been quite influential, shaping debates not just within the field of philosophy, but more widely in academia and indeed in public life. Many social scientists, however, question whether multiculturalism in the real world has been so benign. This paper considers the available evidence, empirically testing the liberal multiculturalism hypothesis, both in Canada and cross-nationally. What does this evidence tell us about the prospects for liberal–democratic multiculturalism and about the impact of multicultural policies on liberal–democratic values?Resume. Au cours des annees 1990, la litterature academique sur le multiculturalisme etait decidement normative, dominee par des philosophes politiques qui ont developpe des theories idealisees d'une forme de citoyennete multiculturelle nettement liberale-democrate. Cette «hypothese du multiculturalisme liberal» – la notion que des politiques de multiculturalisme peuvent etre adoptees sans compromettre les valeurs fondamentales de la democratie liberale – s'est averee tres influente, structurant les debats non seulement dans l'enceinte de la philosophie, mais aussi dans l'arene plus vaste du milieu academique et meme dans la vie publique. Plusieurs chercheurs en sciences humaines, cependant, se demandent si le multiculturalisme dans le monde reel a ete si benin. Cet article examine la preuve disponible tout en evaluant empiriquement l'hypothese du multiculturalisme liberal, tant au Canada qu'ailleurs. Que nous indique cette preuve concernant l'avenir du multiculturalisme liberal democratique et l'impact des politiques multiculturelles sur les valeurs de la democratie liberale?

66 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, different interdisciplinary theoretical approaches for understanding the role of diversity for intergroup relations and social cohesion are reviewed and four extensions to the current literature are proposed, taking advantage of a comparative framework to understand how generalizable the consequences of diversity are.
Abstract: . In recent years, there has been increasing popular and academic debate about how ethnic and racial diversity affects democratic politics and social cohesion in industrialized liberal democracies. In this introduction, different interdisciplinary theoretical approaches for understanding the role of diversity for intergroup relations and social cohesion are reviewed and four extensions to the current literature are proposed. These include taking advantage of a comparative framework to understand how generalizable the consequences of diversity are. A comparative country approach also helps to reveal which policies might be able to mitigate any potential negative consequences of diversity. Most importantly, we propose that the research in this area should include other aspects of social cohesion beyond measures of generalized trust, such as solidarity, attitudes about the welfare state and redistributive justice, as well as political and social tolerance. Finally, research on the effects of diversity might gain more insights from taking less of a majority-centric approach to include the effects on various minority groups as well.Resume. Ces dernieres annees ont procure un sol fertile au debat populaire et universitaire autour des effets de la diversite ethnique et raciale sur la politique democratique et sur la cohesion sociale dans les democraties liberales industrialisees. Dans cette introduction, nous passons en revue diverses approches theoriques interdisciplinaires permettant de clarifier le role de la diversite dans les relations entre les groupes et dans la cohesion sociale et nous proposons quatre ajouts a la litterature courante. Nous suggerons, entre autres, de tirer profit d'un cadre comparatif pour comprendre a quel point les consequences de la diversite sont generalisables. Une etude comparative des pays aide egalement a cerner les politiques qui pourraient attenuer les consequences negatives potentielles de la diversite. Par-dessus tout, nous avancons que la recherche dans ce domaine devrait inclure d'autres aspects de la cohesion sociale a part les mesures de la confiance generalisee, des aspects tels que la solidarite, les attitudes envers l'Etat-providence et la justice redistributive, ainsi que la tolerance politique et sociale. Finalement, la recherche sur les effets de la diversite pourrait devenir plus instructive en adoptant une approche moins centree sur la majorite afin d'inclure egalement les effets sur divers groupes minoritaires.

49 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors examined the influence of ideology in Canadian politics and found that the ideological disagreement between the left and the right is asymmetrical, that is, that leftists and rightists bundle in different ways their opinions about issues.
Abstract: . This article examines the influence of ideology in Canadian politics. The core theory is that political opinions are bound together into ideological clusters by underlying influences that affect simultaneously the opinions of individuals about more than one issue. The central hypothesis is that ideological disagreement between the left and the right is asymmetrical, that is, that leftists and rightists bundle in different ways their opinions about issues. The analysis draws on evidence from Benoit and Laver's survey of experts (2006) about the policy positions of political parties, the Comparative Manifesto Research Project (Budge et al., 2001; Klingemann et al., 2006), and Cross and Young's survey of Canadian political party members (2002). The results of the analysis indicate, first, that Canada's left/right ideological divide is wide by cross-national standards, and, second, that leftists and rightists organize their opinions about the world in different ways.Resume. Cet article examine l'influence des ideologies dans l'environnement politique canadien. La theorie centrale stipule que les opinions politiques sur diverses questions sont structurees en groupes ideologiques consolides par des influences sous-jacentes qui affectent simultanement les opinions des individus. L'hypothese principale decoulant de cette theorie est que la structure du desaccord ideologique entre la gauche et la droite est asymetrique; plus precisement, que les individus situes a la gauche et a la droite du spectre politique canadien organisent de maniere differente leurs opinions politiques. L'analyse s'appuie tout d'abord sur les donnees d'un sondage aupres d'experts politiques realise par Benoit et Laver (2006) et portant sur les positions politiques des partis. Elle utilise egalement les donnees du Comparative Manifesto Research Project (Budge et al. 2001; Klingemann et al., 2006) et celles d'un sondage d'opinion de Cross et Young (2002) effectue aupres des membres de partis politiques canadiens. Les resultats de cette etude demontrent, en premier lieu, qu'il existe un clivage important entre la droite et la gauche au Canada meme lorsqu'il est observe dans une perspective comparative, et en second lieu, que les individus se situant a la gauche et a la droite du spectre politique ont tendance a organiser de maniere differente leurs opinions sur le monde.

46 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluate whether the "trade, not aid" logic has driven bilateral aid allocations in practice and find that donor countries have dispersed bilateral aid in ways that reinforce their extant bilateral commercial ties with recipient countries.
Abstract: . “Trade, not aid” has long been a catchphrase in international development discourse. This paper evaluates whether the “trade, not aid” logic has driven bilateral aid allocations in practice. Using a dataset that covers development assistance from 22 donor countries to 187 aid recipients from 1980 to 2002, we find that donor countries have dispersed bilateral aid in ways that reinforce their extant bilateral commercial ties with recipient countries. Instead of “trade, not aid,” bilateral aid disbursement has followed the logic of “aid following trade.” The policy implication is that bilateral aid allocation patterns have reinforced the disadvantages of poor countries that have a limited ability to participate in international trade due to a variety of factors such as geography and a lack of tradable resources.Resume. «Le commerce et non l'aide» est un slogan qui continue d'occuper une place importante dans le debat sur le developpement international. L'article qui suit vise a evaluer la mise en pratique de ce principe dans les allocations de l'aide bilaterale. S'appuyant sur une base de donnees recouvrant l'aide distribuee par 22 pays donateurs a 187 pays recipiendaires entre 1980 et 2002, notre analyse revele que l'aide a ete allouee en fonction des liens commerciaux bilateraux existants et les a renforces. C'est donc le principe de «l'aide apres le commerce» qui a prevalu. Les allocations d'aide bilaterale ont ainsi aggrave les desavantages des pays pauvres dont la capacite a beneficier du commerce international est limitee en raison de divers facteurs, dont la situation geographique et le manque de ressources marchandes.

41 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors conceptualized federalism as a multi-layered political order comprising an institutional and an ideational layer and introduced two models of political change, the model of path dependence and the process sequencing model, and asked how each model can contribute to explain the emergence of the federal order in Canada and Germany.
Abstract: . This paper starts from the assumption that historical institutionalism has much to offer in order to address important questions raised in the literature on comparative federalism. Historical institutionalism is a useful approach to enhancing our understanding of both the origins that drive federal system dynamics and the dynamic patterns which federal systems unfold over time. The paper conceptualizes federalism as a multi-layered political order, comprising an institutional and an ideational layer. It then introduces two models of political change, the model of path dependence and the process sequencing model, and asks how each model can contribute to explain the emergence of the federal order in Canada and Germany. I conclude that while the model of path dependence lends itself well to capturing federal system dynamics in Germany, the process sequencing model, in contrast, is better suited to explaining sources and patterns of change in Canada.Resume. L'article part de la position que l'institutionnalisme historique constitue une source interessante pour aborder des questions importantes issues de la litterature sur le federalisme comparatif. L'institutionnalisme historique est une approche utile pour elargir notre comprehension des dynamiques politiques dans les systemes federaux. Cet article conceptualise le federalisme comme un ordre politique a plusieurs niveaux comportant une strate institutionnelle et une strate ideationnelle. Puis, deux modeles de transformation politique sont introduits : le modele de la dependance du sentier et un autre qui trace les diverses sequences d'un changement dont la temporalite est decisive pour les resultats. On analyse ensuite la capacite des deux modeles d'expliquer la formation d'un ordre politique federal en Allemagne et au Canada. L'article conclut que le modele de la dependance du sentier est utile pour cerner les dynamiques du systeme federal allemand tandis que le modele des sequences temporelles est meilleur pour expliquer les sources et les transformations du federalisme canadien.

39 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Giasson et al. as discussed by the authors studied the media coverage that 11 daily newspapers dedicated to the state of public opinion in Quebec during the active and intense development phase of the “crisis”.
Abstract: Resume. De mars 2006 a decembre 2007, le Quebec a ete secoue par un debat societal sur la question de la gestion de la diversite culturelle. Cette «crise» aurait ete alimentee par un tsunami mediatique traitant de divers cas d'accommodements juridiques ou d'ajustements administratifs accordes dans les services publics a des citoyens quebecois issus de l'immigration dans la grande region de Montreal (Giasson et coll., 2008). Par le biais d'une couverture etendue, les medias ont attire l'attention de la population sur ces pratiques d'accommodement. L'article presente les donnees exploratoires d'une analyse de contenu de la couverture faite par onze journaux quebecois du climat de l'opinion des Quebecois en matiere de diversite et d'immigration pendant la phase intensive de developpement du debat. L'etude montre que dans leur analyse des sondages d'opinion et dans la presentation generale des tendances de l'opinion publique sur les accommodements raisonnables, les journaux ont mis l'accent sur l'evaluation du malaise des repondants envers l'immigration et la diversite religieuse plutot que sur l'ouverture de la population quebecoise envers la diversite et sur l'apport social de l'immigration, renforcant ainsi davantage l'impression populaire qu'une crise sociale majeure se deroulait et qu'il existait un fosse entre les Quebecois «de souche», les Quebecois issus de l'immigration et les autres Canadiens.Abstract. From March 2006 to December 2007, the province of Quebec experienced a contentious public debate on diversity. The “crisis” was fueled by a “media tsunami” during which news outlets actively reported on numerous cases of reasonable accommodation practices or administrative agreements in public services granted in the Greater Montreal region to citizens of immigrant background (Giasson et al., 2008). Through this extensive coverage, the media brought these instances of accommodation to the public's attention. The research studies the press coverage that 11 daily newspapers dedicated to the state of public opinion in Quebec during the active and intense development phase of the “crisis”. The study shows that in their analysis of polls and their general framing of the mood of public opinion towards reasonable accommodation, newspapers focused mostly on the malaise in the population toward immigration and religious diversity rather than on its openness to diversity and to the positive social outcomes of immigration. In doing so, the media further anchored the popular impression that a serious social crisis was ongoing and that a wide gap in tolerance existed between Francophone Quebeckers, Quebeckers of recent immigrant background and other Canadians.

37 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors explored how immigrants adjust to the prevailing regional political norms in Quebec, Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia, and found that immigrants from non-traditional source countries tend to develop orientations that are more federally oriented than the local populations in their province.
Abstract: . The transformations in recent patterns of immigration have the potential to reshape the trajectory of Canada's regional political dynamics. Drawing on data from the 1993–2006 Canadian Election Studies, this analysis explores how immigrants adjust to the prevailing regional political norms in Quebec, Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia. Do newcomers adopt the political orientations (feelings towards Canada and their province, confidence in provincial and federal governments, perceptions about how the province is treated by the federal government and support for the Liberal party) that resemble those of their native-born provincial counterparts? The results suggest that immigrants, especially newer waves from non-traditional source countries, tend to develop orientations that are more federally oriented than the local populations in their province. This tendency is most pronounced in Quebec where both groups of immigrants from traditional and non-traditional source countries internalize political grievances and norms less efficiently than their counterparts in other provinces.Resume. Les transformations recentes des tendances migratoires pourraient avoir un impact sur l'evolution des dynamiques politiques regionales au Canada. Cette enquete s'appuie sur les donnees de sondage de l'Etude electorale canadienne de 1993 a 2006 et vise a determiner si les immigrants adoptent les attitudes et les comportements politiques dominants de leur province de residence (Quebec, Ontario, Alberta et Colombie-Britannique). Les immigrants adoptent-ils des attitudes et des comportements politiques (attachement au Canada et a la province de residence, confiance envers les gouvernements federal et provincial, perception du traitement reserve par le gouvernement federal a la province de residence et appui au Parti liberal du Canada) qui ressemblent a ceux des populations locales de leur province? Les resultats de l'enquete suggerent que les immigrants, surtout ceux d'origines dites non traditionnelles, ont tendance a developper des comportements et des attitudes politiques plus orientes vers le gouvernement federal que ceux affiches dans leur province. Cette tendance est particulierement marquee au Quebec ou les immigrants, tant d'origines traditionnelles que non traditionnelles, semblent assimiler moins efficacement que les immigrants des autres provinces les griefs et les normes politiques de la population provinciale.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article developed an alternative view, and measure, of political tolerance to account for individual distinctions across types of speech, and found that youth do see exclusionary speech as a special category of “intolerable” speech, consistent with legal restrictions on hate speech in many industrialized democracies.
Abstract: . Conventional measures of political tolerance have tended to assume that people see all forms of speech as equally legitimate (or equally illegitimate). This article develops an alternative view, and measure, of political tolerance to account for individual distinctions across types of speech. Political tolerance is conceptualized using three individual-level dispositions. The intolerant reject speech rights for all objectionable groups; absolute tolerators endorse speech rights for all groups viewed as objectionable; and multicultural tolerators support free speech except when such freedoms are used to target racial and ethnic minorities. Survey data from close to 10,000 youth in Canada and Belgium show that multicultural tolerance reflects civil liberties attitudes among many young citizens. These youth do see exclusionary speech as a special category of “intolerable” speech, consistent with legal restrictions on hate speech in many industrialized democracies. Such target group distinctions are an under-studied and under-specified component of contemporary political tolerance judgments.Resume. Les mesures conventionnelles de la tolerance politique tendent a presumer que les gens percoivent tous les discours comme etant egalement legitimes (ou egalement illegitimes). Cet article developpe une perspective differente et une mesure plus nuancee de la tolerance politique en relevant des distinctions entre les types de propos. On distingue trois dispositions individuelles en matiere de tolerance politique. Les intolerants rejettent la liberte d'expression pour tous les groupes ou propos percus comme importuns; les gens absolument tolerants appuient la liberte d'expression pour tous les groupes ou propos percus comme importuns; et les adherents de la tolerance multiculturelle appuient la libre expression publique des idees, sauf quand celle-ci sert a bafouer les minorites ethniques et raciales. Les resultats d'une enquete menee aupres d'environ 10 000 jeunes au Canada et en Belgique indiquent qu'un grand nombre de jeunes citoyens pratiquent la tolerance multiculturelle. Ces derniers considerent les propos empreints d'exclusion comme une categorie speciale de propos «intolerables», conformement aux lois contre la propagande haineuse adoptees dans la plupart des pays developpes. Les distinctions de ce genre sont des facteurs negliges dans notre comprehension des jugements contemporains sur la tolerance politique.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an updated analysis of the study of municipal, local and urban issues in Canadian political science, concluding that despite several discursive shifts, despite the blossoming of interdisciplinary research in the 1980s and 1990s, the various streams of urban politics continue to be studied in relative isolation from each other.
Abstract: . This paper expands on the work of Higgins, whose 1979 review remains the only synthetic overview of the field, by presenting an updated analysis of the study of municipal, local and urban issues in Canadian political science. We conclude that despite several discursive shifts—from the descriptive works of the 1950s and 1960s, through to the blossoming of interdisciplinary research in the 1980s and 1990s—Higgins' principal conclusion, that the various streams of urban politics continue to be studied in relative isolation from each other, still rings true. Despite the recent broadening of the literature, productive scholarly debates within and across research clusters are rare, and where debates do emerge, they are more often driven by current events and normative claims than by theoretical innovations. To remedy these deficiencies, we propose several bases for a new urban research agenda that is more methodologically and theoretically diverse and connected to work in other disciplines.Resume. Dans la foulee des travaux de Higgins, cet article presente une mise a jour sur les enjeux municipaux, locaux et urbains en science politique canadienne. Higgins publia en 1979 la seule synthese des travaux dans ce domaine disponible a ce jour. Il y concluait que les diverses problematiques associees aux politiques urbaines etaient etudiees de maniere isolee les unes par rapport aux autres. Cette conclusion nous apparait encore juste, malgre les nombreux changements de discours qu'a connus ce domaine d'etudes. En effet, les travaux descriptifs des annees 1950 et 1960 ont fait place, dans les decennies 1980 et 1990, a un foisonnement de recherches interdisciplinaires. Or, malgre ce recent elargissement de la litterature, les debats productifs dans et entre les differents champs de recherche sont rares. De plus, lorsque des debats emergent, ils sont plus souvent motives par les evenements de l'actualite et les opinions emises que par l'innovation theorique. Pour combler ces lacunes, nous proposons plusieurs avenues ouvrant sur un nouvel agenda de recherche en politiques urbaines a la fois plus diversifie sur le plan methodologique et theorique et davantage connecte aux travaux realises a l'exterieur de la science politique.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the external face of Canadian e-government and evaluate the web-based impact of public sector websites in virtual policy networks, arguing that government websites are heavily invested in influencing policy outcomes through information provisioning and dissemination.
Abstract: . Public sector websites are heavily invested in influencing policy outcomes throughinformation provisioning and dissemination. Traditionally e-government research has focusedon the internal functions of e-government studying service delivery, horizontal information pro-cessing integration and levels of implementation maturity.This paper shifts the analytical focusto external-facing e-government to consider the macro presentation of state-sponsored sites onthe Web. To evaluate the external face of Canadian e-government this project measures theweb-based impact of public sector websites in virtual policy networks. Virtual policy networksare web-based issues networks containing content on a specific policy topic and connectedthrough hyperlinks. It is argued that government’s online nodality in these networks is an indi-cator of public sector websites’ authority and influence on the Web. Resume. Les sites Internet du secteur public sont fortement consacres a influencer les resul-tats des politiques publiques en offrant et en disseminant de l’information. Par le passe, larecherche sur l’e-gouvernement s’est concentree sur ses fonctions internes, en etudiant la dis-tribution des services, l’integration horizontale du traitement de l’information et les niveaux dematurite de la mise en œuvre. Cet article deplace la focale analytique vers les fonctions externesde l’e-gouvernement, en considerant une macropresentation de sites etatiques sur la toile. Afind’evaluer la dimension externe de l’e-gouvernement canadien, ce projet mesure l’impact Inter-net de sites du secteur public dans des reseaux virtuels de politiques publiques. Les reseauxvirtuels de politiques publiques sont des reseaux Internet traitant de questions particulieres; ilscontiennent des renseignements sur des questions precises de politiques publiques et sont reliesentre eux par des hyperliens. L’auteure soutient que la nodalite en ligne du gouvernement dansces reseaux est un indicateur de l’autorite des sites Internet du secteur public et de leur influ-ence sur le reste de la toile.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper argued that election campaigns are a key integrating link between parties and that how they fight elections reveals extensive cross-level co-operation, particularly through shared activists (local party activists, party staff and party professionals).
Abstract: . Conventional wisdom about the structure of political parties in Canada has emphasized their confederal nature. In other words (and the New Democratic party excepted), parties with identical partisan complexions at the federal and provincial levels are thought to operate in “two political worlds.” This paper argues that election campaigns are a key integrating link between parties. How they fight elections reveals extensive cross-level co-operation, particularly through shared activists (local party activists, party staff and party professionals) and technological expertise. This has the effect of shrinking the space between party cousins and forges unity between them. While there are certain obstacles to electoral collaboration, there are also incentives for these parties to work to maintain and strengthen their ties with their partisan cousin at the other level. These findings make an important contribution by directly challenging the notion that Canada's federal system has led to increasingly disentangled political parties. Resume. L'opinion communement admise au sujet de la structure des partis politiques au Canada a mis l'accent sur leur nature confederale. En d'autres termes (exception faite du Nouveau Parti democratique), on considere en general que les partis a caractere partisan identique au palier federal et provincial fonctionnent dans «deux mondes politiques a part». Le present article avance que les campagnes electorales constituent un facteur d'integration cle entre les differents niveaux d'un parti. La facon dont un parti dispute une election revele un haut degre de cooperation entre les organisations provinciales et federales, surtout du fait qu'ils partagent des militants communs (militants locaux, personnel politique et professionnels du parti) et leur expertise technologique. Ce phenomene tend a retrecir l'espace entre cousins du meme parti et a bâtir l'unite d'organisation entre les deux niveaux. Meme s'il y a des obstacles inevitables a la collaboration electorale, les partis cousins ont de bonnes raisons de veiller a maintenir et a renforcer leurs liens reciproques. Ces conclusions apportent une contribution importante a l'etude des partis politiques, en contestant directement l'idee que le systeme federal au Canada a encourage les partis politiques de meme allegeance a mener leurs activites de maniere independante.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a simple formal model that incorporates concern for others and election benefits to explain the decision to vote was presented, and the model overcomes the paradox of participation by predicting substantial turnout.
Abstract: . Some citizens differ in their levels of concern for the supporters of various parties. I demonstrate how such concerns can motivate citizens to vote. I first present a simple formal model that incorporates concern for others and election benefits to explain the decision to vote. By predicting substantial turnout, this model overcomes the “paradox of participation.” I then verify the model empirically. I utilize a series dictator games in an online survey of more than 2000 Canadians to measure the concern of individuals for other partisans. I show how the preferences revealed in these games can predict the decision to vote in the face of several conventional controls. Taken together, the formal model and empirical results generate a more fulsome and satisfactory account of the decision to vote than an explanation which relies solely on duty.Resume. Les citoyens ne se preoccupent pas tous des partisans des divers partis politiques. Je demontre comment de telles preoccupations peuvent motiver les citoyens a participer aux elections. Je presente d'abord un modele formel qui explique la decision de voter en integrant les preoccupations a l'egard des autres electeurs et les benefices associes a une election. En predisant une part substantielle de la participation, ce modele surmonte le paradoxe de la participation electorale. Ensuite, le modele est verifie empiriquement. J'emploie a cette fin une serie de jeux du dictateur inseres dans une enquete menee en ligne aupres de 2000 Canadiens afin de mesurer leur degre de preoccupation a l'egard des autres partisans. Je montre comment les preferences revelees dans ces jeux peuvent predire la decision de voter. Ensemble, le modele formel et les resultats empiriques produisent une explication plus eloquente et plus satisfaisante de la decision de voter lors d'une election que les explications qui s'appuient seulement sur le sens du devoir.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a strategic theory of legitimacy cultivation for the Canadian Supreme Court of Canada is presented, which is applied and tested in the context of the 1998 Secession Reference case, showing that patterns of judicial strategic behaviour can provide important insights into how the Supreme Court acquires institutional legitimacy.
Abstract: . While the last few decades have witnessed increased political significance of the Canadian Supreme Court, the Court has also managed to safeguard its institutional legitimacy as evident in the high degree of support it enjoys among the Canadian public. Indeed, how do the Supreme Court of Canada, and high courts everywhere, ensure the attainment and retention of institutional legitimacy? The paper develops an answer to this question by presenting a strategic theory of legitimacy cultivation. The theory is applied and tested in the context of the 1998Secession Reference case. The paper sheds a new light on the case, shows that patterns of judicial strategic behaviour can provide important insights into how the Supreme Court acquires institutional legitimacy and points out the significance of extending the strategic approach to the study of the Canadian Supreme Court.Resume. L'importance politique de la Cour supreme du Canada s'est accrue de maniere notable au cours des dernieres decennies. Malgre tout, la Cour a reussi a maintenir sa legitimite institutionnelle, comme en fait foi le niveau de soutien eleve pour la Cour que manifeste la population canadienne. Mais comment la Cour supreme du Canada, ainsi que les cours supremes ailleurs dans le monde, s'assurent-elles de developper et de maintenir leur legitimite institutionnelle? Cet article propose une reponse a cette question en presentant une theorie strategique du developpement de la legitimite. La theorie est appliquee et testee dans le contexte du Renvoi relatif a la secession duQuebec de 1998. Cet article jette un regard different sur cette decision en demontrant que certaines tendances dans le comportement judiciaire strategique peuvent fournir des indices importants quant a l'acquisition de la legitimite institutionnelle. L'article souligne aussi l'importance d'etendre l'utilisation de l'approche strategique a l'etude de la Cour supreme du Canada.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors explored the magnitude of this racial cleavage and demonstrated how it impacts differential reactions to events (such as accusations of police brutality) and policies (e.g., capital punishment) in the justice domain.
Abstract: . Criminal justice policy in the US has long been exceedingly responsive to public opinion. Unfortunately, public attitudes towards justice in the US are severely bifurcated along racial lines, such that Whites see a system that is “colour-blind” and Blacks perceive one that is severely biased against them. In this paper, we explore the magnitude of this racial cleavage and, more importantly, demonstrate how it impacts differential reactions to events (such as accusations of police brutality) and policies (such as capital punishment) in the justice domain. To the degree that elites base policies on (mainly White) majority preferences, such policies are unlikely to be responsive to the racial discrimination that is a part of the current criminal justice environment.Resume. La politique penale aux Etats-Unis repond enormement a l'opinion publique. Malheureusement, les positions populaires envers la justice americaine sont radicalement divisees suivant l'appartenance raciale. Aux yeux des Blancs, le systeme est essentiellement neutre envers les groupes raciaux differents, mais les Noirs le percoivent comme etant fortement entache de discrimination contre eux. Dans cet article, nous considerons l'etendue de cet ecart racial et, surtout, nous demontrons comment ces perceptions entrainent des reactions differentes envers les evenements (comme les accusations de brutalite policiere) et envers les politiques publiques (comme la peine capitale) dans le domaine de la justice. Dans la mesure ou les elites fondent les politiques sur les preferences de la majorite (surtout blanche), il est peu probable que ces politiques puissent remedier a la discrimination raciale qui fait partie du systeme penal actuel.

Journal ArticleDOI
Royce Koop1
TL;DR: This article explored and developed a classification of constituency association executives and found that executives differ in their personnel, internal relations, organization, leadership and permeability in the Liberal party's constituency associations.
Abstract: . Studies of the local organizations of Canadian political parties often neglect those organizations' small leadership groups, the local executives. This article explores and develops a classification of constituency association executives. Interviews and participant observation in the Liberal party's constituency associations reveal that executives differ in their personnel, internal relations, organization, leadership and permeability. The result of this analysis is the development of two distinct types of executives: professional and sociable. Preliminary analysis suggests that political factors—local electoral strength and the presence of members of Parliament—play a crucial role in determining the development of professional executives.Resume. L'etude des organisations locales des partis politiques canadiens tend a negliger le leadership de ces petites organisations, soit les comites executifs de comte. Cet article explore le sujet et etablit une classification de ces comites. La conduite d'entrevues et une observation participative au sein des associations de circonscription du Parti liberal revelent que les comites executifs different dans leur gestion des ressources humaines, leurs relations internes, leur organisation, leur leadership et leur permeabilite. Les resultats de ces analyses permettent de degager deux types de comite executif de comte, soit le type social et le type professionnel. Des analyses preliminaires permettent aussi de suggerer que des facteurs politiques – la force du parti dans la circonscription et la presence d'un elu au Parlement – jouent un role crucial dans la formation d'un comite executif de type professionnel.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper showed that French is a minority language spoken by a growing number of non-white and non-Christian minority groups, including Muslims, including musulmans, in Canada, and pointed out the contradictions inherent in dichotomous representations of "secularism" when it comes to "western" and "non-western" societies, or “Christian” and “Muslim” groups.
Abstract: . In this article we re-establish the relevance of linguistic diversity by highlighting that French is a minority language spoken by a growing number of non-white and non-Christian minority groups, including Muslims. These groups are often characterized in contemporary Canada as essentially non-modern, traditional and opposed to secularism—characterizations that were used historically to depict French ethnic minorities as essentially Catholic, traditional and non-modern. Utilizing a historically grounded case study of the evolution of French language education rights in Alberta, the study reveals how “Franco-Albertans” are a linguistic minority comprised of other minorities. We also show the contradictions inherent in dichotomous representations of “secularism” when it comes to “Western” and “non-Western” societies, or “Christian” and “Muslim” groups. We argue that in expanding the discipline's focus to deal with a wider range of “groups,” analysts need to attend to how “multiple minorities” may take analytically relevant forms, and be wary of evolutionary and dichotomous constructions of diverse “others.”Resume. Dans cet article, nous redonnons une place importante a la question linguistique comme dimension politique fondamentale au Canada, et au francais comme langue minoritaire parlee par un nombre croissant de groupes minoritaires non blancs et non chretiens, y compris les musulmans. Ces groupes, ce qui n'est pas selon nous sans interet, sont souvent globalement decrits aujourd'hui comme etant non modernes, traditionnels et opposes au secularisme dans un discours qui n'est pas sans evoquer la facon dont les Canadiens francais furent historiquement decrits comme une societe strictement catholique et premoderne. Dans ce cas-ci, le Canada francophone est etudie a travers le prisme de la francophonie albertaine, elle-meme composee de plusieurs minorites. Nous nous concentrons en particulier sur les droits scolaires en Alberta et un lien est aussi etabli entre cette situation et la description souvent dichotomique par rapport au secularisme de la societe canadienne entre les groupes «occidentaux» et «non occidentaux» ou encore entre les groupes «chretiens» d'un cote, et de l'autre, les groupes de la diversite multiculturelle canadienne, notamment les musulmans francophones. La these de cet article est qu'en elargissant le champ d'investigation de la discipline de facon a inclure un eventail de groupes plus grand, les analystes doivent etre vigilants quant a l'articulation complexe du concept de «minorites multiples» de facon a eviter les constructions trop evolutionnistes et dichotomiques des divers «autres».

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors analyzes Canadian policies towards asylum seekers from the 1950s to the 1980s to explore the ways in which the restriction of rights can undermine state control policies by generating rights-based politics, encouraging the circumvention of control policies and creating administrative inefficiencies.
Abstract: . Since the 1990s, a prevalent theme in the comparative literature on liberal–democratic state responses to increasing international migration holds that the expansion of rights protections for non-citizens has undermined restrictive border control policies. The argument presented in this article suggests that this is too partial an understanding of the ways in which control and rights intersect—the control–rights nexus. Accordingly, it analyzes Canadian policies towards asylum seekers from the 1950s to the 1980s to explore the ways in which the restriction of rights can undermine state control policies by generating rights-based politics, encouraging the circumvention of control policies and creating administrative inefficiencies. Altogether, the analysis provides an important refinement of the study of the control–rights nexus and allows for a more complete understanding of control policies and politics in liberal–democratic states.Resume. Depuis les annees 1990, un theme repandu dans la litterature comparative sur les reponses des Etats liberaux democratiques a la croissance de la migration internationale soutient que l'extension de la protection des droits des non-citoyens a compromis les politiques restrictives de controle des frontieres. L'argument presente dans cet article suggere que ce theme offre une comprehension trop partielle de la dynamique d'intersection du controle et des droits – le control-rights nexus. En consequence, il analyse les politiques canadiennes envers les demandeurs d'asile depuis les annees 1950 jusqu'aux annees 1980 pour explorer les manieres dont la restriction des droits peut miner les politiques de controle de l'Etat en generant des politiques de droits, en encourageant le contournement des politiques de controle et en creant des lourdeurs administratives. En somme, l'analyse apporte une mise au point importante a l'etude de cet enjeu et permet une comprehension plus complete des politiques de controle et de la politique dans les Etats liberaux democratiques.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the different implementation pathways of this policy are directly linked to the structuring of social actors in each field, and they show the need to go beyond the usual explanations regarding the implementation of public policies which stress the importance of political actors and policy networks.
Abstract: Resume. En 2001, le gouvernement quebecois adopte la Politique de reconnaissance et de soutien a l'action communautaire. La mise en œuvre de cette politique a mene a des resultats contrastes en fonction des champs d'intervention consideres. Dans cet article, nous soutenons que la mise en œuvre differenciee de la Politique est directement liee a la structuration des acteurs sociaux dans chaque champ d'intervention. Par l'analyse de deux champs, le champ de l'environnement et celui de la defense collective des droits, nous montrons comment, au-dela des explications usuelles des processus de mise en œuvre des politiques publiques qui font intervenir le role des acteurs politiques et des reseaux, c'est la prise en compte de l'action autonome des acteurs sociaux qui permet de comprendre la differenciation des trajectoires de mise en œuvre.Abstract. In 2001, the Quebec government adopted its Politique de reconnaissance et de soutien a l'action communautaire. The implementation of this policy has led to contrasting results depending on the fields of intervention considered. We argue that the different implementation pathways of this policy are directly linked to the structuring of social actors in each field. Using two fields of intervention – the environment and advocacy – as case studies, we show the need to go beyond the usual explanations regarding the implementation of public policies which stress the importance of political actors and policy networks. Without neglecting the role of the latter, the different pathways in the implementation processes of this policy are also largely due to the autonomous action of social actors.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide forecasts for the 2007 French presidential election gathering contributions from Public Choice theory and Political science dealing with electoral behaviors and propose some explanation and improvements for 2012.
Abstract: Resume. Prevoir le vote en tant que revelation des preferences des citoyens dans les choix collectifs permet d'evaluer les chances de succes des sortants ou de l'opposition et d'anticiper les politiques publiques futures. Dans cet article, nous donnons une prevision de l'election presidentielle de 2007 en France a partir d'une fonction de vote mobilisant les apports de la theorie des choix publics et de la science politique des comportements electoraux. Les previsions generees au niveau territorial sont plus pertinentes pour le second tour que pour le premier tour. Nous offrons quelques elements d'explication et des pistes d'amelioration pour 2012.Abstract. Forecasting votes understood as citizens revealed preferences in collective choices allow to evaluate electoral success opportunities both for incumbents and opposition and to anticipate future public policies. In this paper, we provide forecasts for the 2007 French presidential election gathering contributions from Public Choice theory and Political science dealing with electoral behaviors. Forecasts generated at a sub-national level exhibit more accuracy at the second round than at the first one. We propose some explanation and improvements for 2012.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a model that predicts the outcome of the second-round vote in the French presidential election with the hypothesis of a classic duel between left and right is presented. But the model is not suitable for the case of the current election.
Abstract: . The purpose of this article is to build a model that explains and forecasts the outcome of the second-round vote in the French presidential elections (with the hypothesis of a classic duel between left and right) in each department and at the national level. This model highlights the influence of the popularity of the Socialist party and a partisan variable in the explanation of the second-round vote for the candidate of the left in the French presidential elections. Its forecasts for the elections of the past (1981–1995 and 1981–2007, excluding 2002) are satisfactory and we make ex ante forecasts for the 2007 French presidential election.Resume. L'objet de cet article est de construire un modele qui explique et prevoit le resultat du second tour de scrutin aux elections presidentielles francaises (en supposant le duel classique entre la gauche et la droite) dans chaque departement et au niveau national. Ce modele met en lumiere l'influence de la popularite du Parti socialiste et d'une variable partisane dans l'explication du vote au second tour pour le candidat de la gauche aux elections presidentielles. Les previsions ex post pour les elections passees (de 1981 a 1995 et de 1981 a 2007, en excluant 2002) sont satisfaisantes et on etablit des previsions ex ante pour l'election presidentielle francaise de 2007.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article analyzed the federal government's concessions before the Supreme Court of Canada that its own laws are unconstitutional under the Charter of Rights, marking the first time that concessions have been analyzed empirically in Canada.
Abstract: . This article analyzes the federal government's concessions before the Supreme Court of Canada that its own laws are unconstitutional under the Charter of Rights, marking the first time that concessions have been analyzed empirically in Canada. Using data from 1984–2004, the author finds that full concessions of unconstitutionality are exceptionally rare but that partial concessions are not uncommon. There is weak support for the hypothesis that governments are more willing to concede laws passed by previous governments of a different party, but, on the whole, the federal government appears committed to defending its laws in court. The author explores the implications of this for the relationship between the judiciary and the executive, including judicial activism, Charter dialogue and government use of the courts to advance policy goals. Resume. Cet article analyse les concessions du gouvernement federal devant la Cour supreme du Canada que ses propres lois violent la Charte canadienne des droits et libertes . Il s'agit, en fait, de la premiere analyse empirique de ces concessions au Canada. S'appuyant sur des donnees des annees 1984 a 2004, l'auteur constate que les concessions completes d'inconstitutionnalite sont exceptionnellement rares, mais que les concessions partielles ne sont pas inhabituelles. On donne peu d'appui a l'hypothese que les gouvernements sont plus disposes a conceder les lois passees par des gouvernements precedents representant un autre parti, et, dans l'ensemble, le gouvernement federal semble etre engage a defendre ses lois devant les cours. L'auteur explore l'incidence de cette situation sur les relations entre le pouvoir judiciaire et le pouvoir executif, abordant, entre autres, la question de l'activisme judiciaire, du dialogue sur la Charte et de l'utilisation des tribunaux par le gouvernement pour promouvoir certaines politiques.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors showed that electoral speeches are less theoretical and more action orientated as indicated by the predominance of verbal over nominal groups and the very frequent presence of negative construction and the use of opponents' names highlight the polemic character of electoral speeches.
Abstract: This case study demonstrates that electoral speeches possess specific characteristics. We give the example of Stephen Harper's speeches, given during the 2008 elections, which differ from those delivered when he was prime minister. The electoral speech is more socially anchored. It values the nation. When he is campaigning, S. Harper also uses the pronoun "we" more frequently, so that he does not appear as the main decider of collective choices. Compared with governmental speeches, electoral speeches are also less theoretical and more action orientated as indicated by the predominance of verbal over nominal groups. The very frequent presence of the negative construction and the use of opponents' names highlight the polemic character of electoral speeches. Mots clefs : discours politique ; discours electoral ; lexicometrie ; Canada ; Harper Political discourses ; electoral speeches ; lexical statistics ;

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors examines the different electoral reform projects proposed since the turn of the millennium in Canadian provinces and the territory of Nunavut, in order to reveal what accommodation they have made to the objective of increasing the feminization of legislative assemblies.
Abstract: Resume. Ce texte examine les differents projets de reforme electorale proposes depuis le tournant du millenaire dans les provinces canadiennes et au Nunavut, et ce, avec le souci de mettre au jour la place qu'ils amenagerent a l'objectif d'accentuer la feminisation des assemblees legislatives. L'idee maitresse qui l'inspire veut que les propositions reformatrices aient reserve une importance le plus souvent nulle, bien que parfois accessoire, mais jamais centrale, a cette question. Pourtant, le Quebec, et surtout le territoire du Nunavut, se demarquent par l'attention qu'ils porterent au probleme de l'effacement des femmes de la scene politique et leurs propositions de reforme ont offert des reponses plus a meme de le solutionner.Abstract. This essay examines the different electoral reform projects proposed since the turn of the millennium in Canadian provinces and the territory of Nunavut, in order to reveal what accommodation they have made to the objective of increasing the feminization of legislative assemblies. My guiding idea is that most reform proposals have given no, or sometimes peripheral, emphasis to this question but have never made it a central issue. However, Quebec and, even more, Nunavut stand out for the attention that they have paid to the absence of women from the political scene, and their reform proposals have included responses that might offer a solution.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a note de recherche se propose d'interroger le fait terroriste a travers une etude du paradigme faisant du terrorisme post 11 septembre 2001 un phenomene " nouveau ".
Abstract: Cette note de recherche se propose d'interroger le fait terroriste a travers une etude du paradigme faisant du terrorisme post 11 septembre 2001 un phenomene " nouveau ". L'interet de cette contribution est d'examiner precisement la validite de ces etudes tout en degageant une approche singuliere du terrorisme en tant qu'objet de recherche. Grâce a l'elargissement de la focale d'analyse a un ensemble heterogene d'acteurs (pouvoir politiques et de securite, medias, opinions publiques), nous proposons une lecture en termes de " scene terroriste ". Ne pas se centrer exclusivement sur l'etude des groupes revendiquant la violence politique offre la possibilite de poser de maniere renouvelee la question de la nouveaute du terrorisme post-11septembre comme phenomene politique a part entiere.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the meaning of social decline and its relationship to multiculturalism and diversity, and argue that participation has not so much declined over the last 40 years (as Robert Putnam, for example, has argued) as it has changed because of what I call the politics of the us's.
Abstract: . In the last 20 years, the idea that the social realm is under threat of decline or collapse has been a central theme in academic literature and political analysis. In this short paper I explore the meaning of social decline and its relationship to multiculturalism and diversity. Using the twin notions of participation and trust as two key measures of social decline, I argue that participation has not so much declined over the last 40 years (as Robert Putnam, for example, has argued) as it has changed because of what I call the politics of the us's—groups historically oppressed (including women, ethnic and racialized minorities and gay, lesbian and disabled citizens) who have created new kinds of advocacy organizations in order to change the norms of civil society itself. I also argue that such changes (while often perceived as negative in relation to a transcendent “us”) are positive to the extent that they have made society more inclusive, respectful of diversity and just. Trust, on the other hand, has declined but, I argue, this is also due to the politics of diversity as the us's fought for change and other groups responded by defending traditional norms and values, often in the name of a transcendental us, creating a vicious circle of distrust as each side feels betrayed by the other's victories. Thus, I conclude, to understand social decline, in terms of participation and trust, we must pay attention not only to the us but also to the us's in civil society. The tendency, therefore, to champion a transcendent us in order to reverse social decline, as many scholars and politicians seem prone to do in recent years, not only ignores the us's but may foreclose on their hope for a future free from discrimination and hate.Resume. Au cours des vingt dernieres annees, l'idee que le champ social est menace de declin ou d'effondrement a ete un theme central dans la litterature academique et l'analyse politique. Dans ce court article, j'explore la signification du declin social et sa relation avec le multiculturalisme et la diversite. En utilisant les notions liees de participation et de confiance en tant que deux mesures principales du declin social, j'avance que la participation n'a pas tellement diminue au cours des quarante dernieres annees (comme le soutient Robert Putnam, par exemple), mais qu'elle a plutot change en raison de ce que j'appelle la politique des nous – soit des groupes longtemps opprimes (comprenant les femmes, les minorites ethniques et racialisees, ainsi que les gais, les lesbiennes et les personnes handicapees) qui ont cree de nouveaux types d'organismes representatifs afin de changer les normes de la societe civile. Je soutiens egalement que de tels changements (souvent percus negativement par rapport a un «nous» transcendant) sont positifs dans la mesure ou ils ont permis a la societe de devenir plus inclusive, plus respectueuse de la diversite et plus juste. D'autre part, la confiance a effectivement diminue, mais je soutiens que c'est egalement en raison de la politique de la diversite, car les nous ont lutte pour faire changer les choses et d'autres groupes ont reagi en defendant les normes et les valeurs traditionnelles, souvent au nom d'un «nous» transcendant – creant ainsi un cercle vicieux de mefiance ou chaque cote se sent trahi par les victoires de l'autre. Je conclus donc que pour comprendre le declin social, en termes de participation et de confiance, nous devons porter attention non seulement au «nous», mais egalement aux nous dans la societe civile. Par consequent, la tendance a proner un «nous» transcendant afin de renverser le declin social, comme le font plusieurs chercheurs et politiciens ces dernieres annees, en plus d'ignorer les nous, peut aussi eteindre leur espoir d'un avenir libre de discrimination et de haine.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors examined the 121 federal by-elections held between general elections from 1963 to 2008 and found that minor parties and independent candidates perform better in byelections than in general elections.
Abstract: Abstract. Despite the development of electoral studies in Canada, by-elections have received little attention from researchers. We believe that these are important political events. This research note examines the 121 federal by-elections held between general elections from 1963 to 2008. Our analysis indicates that turnout in by-elections is driven by the larger societal determinants of turnout and not the characteristics of each race. We also find that the support of the government party in a by-election is affected by changes in national opinion towards the government, but only in the third-party system. We find that minor parties and independent candidates perform better in by-elections than in general elections. And we find no difference in the re-election rates of by-election winners and those who enter parliament through general elections. Résumé. Malgré le développement des études électorales au Canada, les élections partielles ont reçu très peu d'attention de la part des chercheurs. Nous croyons qu'il s'agit pourtant d'événements importants dans la vie politique canadienne. Cette note de recherche examine les 121 élections partielles fédérales survenues entre les élections générales de 1963 à 2008. Notre analyse indique que le taux de participation aux élections partielles est davantage influencé par des déterminants sociétaux que par des caractéristiques propres à chacune. Nous constatons aussi que les fluctuations de l'opinion publique canadienne à l'égard du gouvernement influençaient la performance du parti gouvernemental lors des élections partielles avant le réalignement partisan de 1993, mais que ce n'est plus le cas dans le système partisan actuel. Nous observons également que les petits partis et les candidats indépendants enregistrent de meilleures performances lors des élections partielles et qu'il n'y a pas, aux élections générales qui suivent, de différence notable entre le taux de réélection des gagnants aux élections partielles et celui des autres députés sortants.