scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 1996-9457

Drinking Water Engineering and Science 

Copernicus Publications on behalf of the TU Delft
About: Drinking Water Engineering and Science is an academic journal published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the TU Delft. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Water quality & Water treatment. It has an ISSN identifier of 1996-9457. It is also open access. Over the lifetime, 121 publications have been published receiving 2418 citations. The journal is also known as: DWES (Internet) & DWES (Print).


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Nanofiltration (NF) is one of the widely used membrane processes for water and wastewater treatment in addition to other applications such as desalination as mentioned in this paper, which has replaced reverse osmosis (RO) membranes in many applications due to lower energy consumption and higher flux rates.
Abstract: . The application of membrane technology in water and wastewater treatment is increasing due to stringent water quality standards. Nanofiltration (NF) is one of the widely used membrane processes for water and wastewater treatment in addition to other applications such as desalination. NF has replaced reverse osmosis (RO) membranes in many applications due to lower energy consumption and higher flux rates. This paper briefly reviews the application of NF for water and wastewater treatment including fundamentals, mechanisms, fouling challenges and their controls.

172 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a literature review presented in this paper concludes that at this level health risks cannot be excluded, and it is recommended that water supply companies optimize arsenic removal to a level of <1?g L?1, which is technically feasible.
Abstract: For more than a decade it has been known that shallow tube wells in Bangladesh are frequently contaminated with arsenic concentrations at a level that is harmful to human health. By now it is clear that a disaster of an unheard magnitude is going on: the World Health Organization has estimated that long-term exposure to arsenic in groundwater, at concentrations over 500 ?g L?1, causes death in 1 in 10 adults. Other studies show that problems with arsenic in groundwater/drinking water occur in many more countries worldwide, such as in the USA and China. In Europe the focus on arsenic problems is currently confined to countries with high arsenic levels in their groundwater, such as Serbia, Hungary and Italy. In most other European countries, the naturally occurring arsenic concentrations are mostly lower than the European drinking water standard of 10 ?g L?1. However, from the literature review presented in this paper, it is concluded that at this level health risks cannot be excluded. As consumers in European countries expect the drinking water to be of impeccable quality, it is recommended that water supply companies optimize arsenic removal to a level of <1 ?g L?1, which is technically feasible. OA-fund TU Delft

130 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Dutch approach that allows production and distribution of drinking water without the use of chlorine while not compromising microbial safety at the tap is summarized as follows: 1. Use the best source available, in order of preference: microbiologically safe groundwater, surface water with soil passage such as artificial recharge or bank filtration, direct treatment of surface water in a multiple barrier treatment; 2. Prevent ingress of contamination during distribution, and monitor for timely detection of any failure of the system to prevent significant health consequences as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The Netherlands is one of the few countries where chlorine is not used at all, neither for primary disinfection nor to maintain a residual disinfectant in the distribution network. The Dutch approach that allows production and distribution of drinking water without the use of chlorine while not compromising microbial safety at the tap, can be summarized as follows: 1. Use the best source available, in order of preference: microbiologically safe groundwater, surface water with soil passage such as artificial recharge or bank filtration, direct treatment of surface water in a multiple barrier treatment; 2. Use a preferred physical process treatment such as sedimentation, filtration and UV-disinfection. If absolutely necessary, also oxidation by means of ozone or peroxide can be used, but chlorine is avoided; 3. Prevent ingress of contamination during distribution; 4. Prevent microbial growth in the distribution system by production and distribution of biologically stable (biostable) water and the use of biostable materials; 5. Monitor for timely detection of any failure of the system to prevent significant health consequences. OA-fund TU Delft

101 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the results showed that the rapid determination methods (i.e., FCM and ATP) correlated well (R2=0.69), but only a weak correlation was observed between the rapid methods and conventional HPC data.
Abstract: . The general microbial quality of drinking water is normally monitored by heterotrophic plate counts (HPC). This method has been used for more than 100 years and is recommended in drinking water guidelines. However, the HPC method is handicapped because it is time-consuming and restricted to culturable bacteria. Recently, rapid and accurate detection methods have emerged, such as adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP) measurements to assess microbial activity in drinking water, and flow cytometry (FCM) to determine the total cell concentration (TCC). It is necessary and important for drinking water quality control to understand the relationships among the conventional and new methods. In the current study, all three methods were applied to 200 drinking water samples obtained from two local buildings connected to the same distribution system. Samples were taken both on normal working days and weekends, and the correlations between the different microbiological parameters were determined. TCC in the samples ranged from 0.37–5.61×105 cells/ml, and two clusters, the so-called high (HNA) and low (LNA) nucleic acid bacterial groups, were clearly distinguished. The results showed that the rapid determination methods (i.e., FCM and ATP) correlated well (R2=0.69), but only a weak correlation (R2=0.31) was observed between the rapid methods and conventional HPC data. With respect to drinking water monitoring, both FCM and ATP measurements were confirmed to be useful and complimentary parameters for rapid assessing of drinking water microbial quality.

94 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An overview of the methods for removal of natural organic matter (NOM) in water, particularly humic substances (HS), with focus on the Norwegian experiences, is given in this article.
Abstract: . The paper gives an overview of the methods for removal of natural organic matter (NOM) in water, particularly humic substances (HS), with focus on the Norwegian experiences. It is demonstrated that humic substances may be removed by a variety of methods, such as; molecular sieving through nanofiltration membranes, coagulation with subsequent floc separation (including granular media or membrane filtration), oxidation followed by biofiltration and sorption processes including chemisorption (ion exchange) and physical adsorption (activated carbon). All these processes are in use in Norway and the paper gives an overview of the operational experiences.

91 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
20224
20216
20205
20197
20184
201719