scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers in "Ejso in 2020"


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: This analysis using a national cancer database revealed a significant impact on OS when surgeries for resectable colon cancer were delayed beyond 40 days from time of diagnosis.
Abstract: Purpose To assess the impact of delay from diagnosis to curative surgery on survival in patients with non-metastatic colon cancer. Methods National Cancer database (NCDB) analysis (2004–2013) including all consecutive patients diagnosed with stage I-III colon cancer and treated with primary elective curative surgery. Short and long delays were defined as lower and upper quartiles of time from diagnosis to treatment, respectively. Age-, sex-, race-, tumor stage and location-, adjuvant treatment-, comorbidity- and socioeconomic factors-adjusted overall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups (short vs. long delay). A multivariable Cox regression model was used to identify the independent impact of each factor on OS. Results Time to treatment was Conclusion This analysis using a national cancer database revealed a significant impact on OS when surgeries for resectable colon cancer were delayed beyond 40 days from time of diagnosis.

78 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
25 Aug 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: The present ERAS recommendations for CRS±HIPEC are based on a standardised expert consensus process providing clinicians with valuable guidance, and there is an urgent need to produce high quality studies for C RS±HIPS and to prospectively evaluate recommendations in clinical practice.
Abstract: Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to considerably reduce complications, length of stay and costs after most of surgical procedures by standardised application of best evidence-based perioperative care. The aim was to elaborate dedicated recommendations for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a two-part series of guidelines based on expert consensus. The present part I of the guidelines highlights preoperative and intraoperative management. Methods The core group assembled a multidisciplinary panel of 24 experts involved in peritoneal surface malignancy surgery representing the fields of general surgery (n = 12), gynaecological surgery (n = 6), and anaesthesia (n = 6). Experts systematically reviewed and summarized the available evidence on 72 identified perioperative care items, following the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, evaluation) system. Final consensus (defined as ≥50%, or ≥70% of weak/strong recommendations combined) was reached by a standardised 2-round Delphi process, regarding the strength of recommendations. Results Response rates were 100% for both Delphi rounds. Quality of evidence was evaluated high, moderate low and very low, for 15 (21%), 26 (36%), 29 (40%) and 2 items, respectively. Consensus was reached for 71/72(98.6%) items. Strong recommendations were defined for 37 items, No consensus could be reached regarding the preemptive use of fresh frozen plasma. Conclusion The present ERAS recommendations for CRS±HIPEC are based on a standardised expert consensus process providing clinicians with valuable guidance. There is an urgent need to produce high quality studies for CRS±HIPEC and to prospectively evaluate recommendations in clinical practice.

68 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: This newly developed nomogram using gene expression can predict the 5-year RFP for gastric cancer patients after surgical treatment and it is hoped that this nomogram will help in the therapeutic decision between endoscopic treatment and gastrectomy.
Abstract: Background Recently, researchers have tried to predict patient prognosis using biomarker expression in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram predicting the 5-year recurrence-free probability (RFP) of gastric cancer patients using prognostic biomarker gene expression. Methods We enrolled 360 patients in the training data set to develop the predictive model and nomogram. We analyzed the patients’ general variables and the gene expression levels of 10 prognostic biomarker candidates between the nonrecurrence and recurrence groups. We also performed external validation using 420 patients from the validation data set. Results The final nomogram was composed of age, sex, and the expression levels of CAPZA, PPase, OCT-1, PRDX4, gamma-enolase, and c-Myc. The five-year RFPs were 89%, 75%, 54% and 32% for the patients in the low-risk, intermediate-risk, high-risk and very-high-risk groups in the development cohort, respectively. In the external validation cohort, the 5-year RFPs were 89%, 75%, 63% and 60%, respectively. The areas under the curve were 0.718 (95% CI, 0.65–0.78) and 0.640 (95% CI, 0.57–0.70) for the training and validation data sets, respectively. The RFP Kaplan-Meier curves were significantly different among the 4 groups in the training and validation data sets (p Conclusion This newly developed nomogram using gene expression can predict the 5-year RFP for gastric cancer patients after surgical treatment. We hope that this nomogram will help in the therapeutic decision between endoscopic treatment and gastrectomy.

60 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: RPD appears to offer some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, although both approaches appear to offer equivalent clinical outcomes, and a high-quality randomised trial comparing both techniques is needed.
Abstract: Background Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) offers theoretical advantages to conventional laparoscopic surgery including improved instrument dexterity, 3D visualization and better ergonomics. This review aimed to determine if these theoretical advantages translate into improved patient outcomes comparing patients having either robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy or laparoscopic (LPD) equivalent. Method A systematic literature search was conducted for studies reporting minimally invasive surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy either robotic assisted or totally laparoscopic. Meta-analysis of intra-operative (blood loss, operating times, conversion and R0 resections) and postoperative outcomes (overall complications, pancreatic fistula, length of hospital stay) was performed using a random effects model. Result This review identified 44 studies, of which six were non-randomised comparative studies including 3462 patients (1025 robotic and 2437 laparoscopic). Intraoperatively, RPD was associated with significantly lower conversion rates (OR 0.45, p Conclusion RPD appears to offer some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, although both approaches appear to offer equivalent clinical outcomes. Importantly, the quality of evidence is generally limited to cohort studies and a high-quality randomised trial comparing both techniques is needed.

60 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: The present ERAS recommendations for CRS ± HIPEC are based on a standardised expert consensus process providing clinicians with valuable guidance, and there is an urgent need to produce high quality studies for C RS ±-HIPec and to prospectively evaluate recommendations in clinical practice.
Abstract: Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to considerably reduce complications, length of stay and costs after most of surgical procedures by standardised application of best evidence-based perioperative care. The aim was to elaborate dedicated recommendations for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a two-part series of guidelines based on expert consensus. The present part II of the guidelines highlights postoperative management and special considerations. Methods The core group assembled a multidisciplinary panel of 24 experts involved in peritoneal surface malignancy surgery representing the fields of general surgery (n = 12), gynaecological surgery (n = 6), and anaesthesia (n = 6). Experts systematically reviewed and summarized the available evidence on 72 identified perioperative care items, following the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, evaluation) system. Final consensus (defined as ≥50%, or ≥70% of weak/strong recommendations combined) was reached by a standardised 2-round Delphi process, regarding the strength of recommendations. Results Response rates were 100% for both Delphi rounds. Quality of evidence was evaluated high, moderate low and very low, for 15 (21%), 26 (36%), 29 (40%) and 2 items, respectively. Consensus was reached for 71/72(98.6%) items. Strong recommendations were defined for 37 items. No consensus could be reached regarding the preemptive use of fresh frozen plasma. Conclusion The present ERAS recommendations for CRS ± HIPEC are based on a standardised expert consensus process providing clinicians with valuable guidance. There is an urgent need to produce high quality studies for CRS ± HIPEC and to prospectively evaluate recommendations in clinical practice.

55 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: Both RH and LH in malignant and benign conditions were associated with lower morbidity rates, shorter hospital stay and the procedure related costs were statistically nonsignificant between RH, LH and OH.
Abstract: Background The evidence of pairwise meta-analysis of Robotic Hepatectomy (RH) vs Laparoscopic Hepatectomy (LH) and RH vs Open Hepatectomy (OH) is inconclusive. Therefore, the aim of this study, was to compare the outcomes of RH, LH and OH by performing a network meta-analysis. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in the following databases: Pubmed, Google scholar, EMBASE and Cochrane library. Cost-effectiveness and survival benefits were selected as primary outcomes. Results The cost was less in OH compared to both minimally invasive procedures, LH demonstrated lower cost compared to RH, but the differences were not statistically significant. Both the RH and LH cohorts demonstrated significantly lower estimated blood loss, reduced major morbidity rate and shorter length of stay compared to OH cohort. The LH and OH cohorts demonstrated significantly shorter operative time and duration of clamping compared to the RH cohort. The LH cohort included significantly smaller tumours compared to the OH cohort. Conclusion The present network meta-analysis, demonstrated that both RH and LH in malignant and benign conditions were associated with lower morbidity rates, shorter hospital stay and the procedure related costs were statistically nonsignificant between RH, LH and OH.

54 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
07 Jan 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: TACE+RFA offer comparable oncologic outcomes in patients with HCC as compared with SR and with added benefit of lower morbidity.
Abstract: Background Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) remains the third most common cause of cancer death worldwide, with countries in Asia being affected the most. The mainstay of curative therapy for early HCC is radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or surgery; either surgical resection (SR) or liver transplantation. Latest evidence however suggests that combination of TACE+ RFA may provide outcomes comparable to SR. Aim To compare oncologic outcomes and safety profile of TACE + RFA to SR alone in HCC. Materials and methods A systematic review was conducted through Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for literature published before April 2019. Outcomes measured were disease-free survival(DFS), overall survival(OS) and major complications. DFS was further divided into local tumour progression(LTP), intrahepatic distant recurrence(IDR) and distant metastasis(DM). Results Eight retrospective studies and one randomized controlled trial, involving 1892 patients met eligibility criteria and were included. Unadjusted pooled analysis demonstrated no significant difference in 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS and 1-year DFS between TACE+RFA and SR. SR had superior 3-year DFS (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62–0.98, p = 0.03) and 5-year DFS (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58–0.95, p = 0.02) compared to TACE+RFA. When analysing only the propensity matched data, the difference in 3-year DFS and 5-year DFS was not significant. TACE+RFA had a higher LTP rate (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.05–5.86, p = 0.04) compared to SR but IDR and DM rates were not significant. Discussion and conclusion TACE+RFA offer comparable oncologic outcomes in patients with HCC as compared with SR and with added benefit of lower morbidity.

52 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jun 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: This review concentrates on novel key findings in the etiopathogenesis of AL, how they can contribute in determining LR, and measures which may contribute to reducing its incidence.
Abstract: Anastomotic leak (AL) remains a potentially life-threatening sequela of colorectal surgery impacting on mortality, short- and long-term morbidity, quality of life, local recurrence (LR) and disease-free survival. Despite technical improvements and the identification of several surgery- and patient-related factors associated to the risk of AL, its incidence has not significantly changed over time. In this context, the clarification of the mechanisms underlying anastomotic healing remains an important unmet need, crucial for improving patients' outcomes. This review concentrates on novel key findings in the etiopathogenesis of AL, how they can contribute in determining LR, and measures which may contribute to reducing its incidence. AL results from a complex, dynamic interplay of several factors and biological processes, including host genetics, gut microbiome, inflammation and the immune system. Many of these factors seem to act in concert to drive both AL and LR, even if the exact mechanisms remain to be elucidated. The next generation sequencing technology, including the microbial metagenomics, could lead to tailored bowel preparations targeting only those pathogens that can cause AL. Significant progress is being made in each of the reviewed areas, moving toward translational and targeted therapeutic strategies to prevent the difficult complication of AL.

49 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
19 Jun 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: Only multifocality was found to be the predictor of recurrence in all PTC, PTMC, and non-PTMC patients, and an increase in the number of tumors was associated with an increased risk of ETE, vascular invasion, CLNM and LLNM.
Abstract: Background Although multifocality is often observed in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), the associations with clinicopathologic factors and the prognostic value are still controversial. We aimed to identify the risk factors for multifocality and bilaterality, and investigate the significance of multifocality on prognosis in all PTC, papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) and non-PTMC. Methods: Data from 635 patients who underwent lobectomy/total thyroidectomy plus cervical lymph node dissection for PTC were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathological factors associated with multifocal PTC and bilateral PTC were investigated by univariate analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analyses was used to identify the clinicopathological prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival. Results: Multifocal and bilateral PTC were observed in 157 (24.7%) and 99 (15.6%) patients, respectively. The frequency of large diameter (>1.0 cm), extrathyroidal extension (ETE), vascular invasion and central lymph node metastases (CLNM) was higher in multifocal PTC than that of solitary PTC. Moreover, ETE, vascular invasion, CLNM and lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) were more frequent in patients with 3 or more tumor foci compared to those with 2 tumor foci and 1 tumor lesion. Bilateral PTC had higher rates of ETE and CLNM. Multifocality was found to be the predictor of recurrence in all PTC, PTMC, and non-PTMC. In addition, the risk of recurrence increased with increasing number of tumor foci in all multifocal PTC patients and multifocal non-PTMC patients. Conclusion: Although multifocality and bilaterality had more aggressive features in PTC, only multifocality was associated with the increased risk of recurrence. An increase in the number of tumors was associated with an increased risk of ETE, vascular invasion, CLNM and LLNM. The prognostic value of multifocality is particularly significant in non-PTMC patients.

44 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 May 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: Low quality evidence suggests that both RFA and MWA seem superior to CA, and surgical resection still seems to provide superior DFS and OS in comparison with LAT.
Abstract: Introduction Local ablative therapies (LAT) have shown positive but heterogenous outcomes in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate LAT and compare them with surgical resection. Methods In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were searched for reports published before January 2019. We included papers assessing radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation (CA) and electroporation (IRE) treating resectable CRLM with curative intention. We evaluated LAT related complications and oncological outcomes as tumour progression (LTP), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results The literature search yielded 6767 records; 20 papers (860 patients) were included. No included studies related mortality with LAT. Median adverse events percentage was 7%: (8% RFA;7% MWA). Median 3y-DFS was 32% (24% RFA; 60% MWA); 5y-DFS was 27%: (18% RFA; 38.5% MWA). Median 3y-OS was 59% (60% RFA; 70% MWA; 34% CA), 5y-OS was 44.5% (43% RFA; 55% MWA; 20% CA). Surgical resection showed decreased LTP, improved DFS and OS than those reported with LAT, with RFA accounting for reduced 1y-DFS (RR 0.83, 95%CI 0.71–0.98), 3y-DFS (RR 0.5, 95%CI 0.33–0.76), 5y-DFS (RR 0.53, 95%CI 0.28–0.98) and 5y-OS (RR 0.76, 95%CI 0.58–0.98) in comparison with surgical resection. Conclusions Low quality evidence suggests that both RFA and MWA seem superior to CA. MWA presents similar adverse events when compared to RFA with a possible increase in DFS and OS. Surgical resection still seems to provide superior DFS and OS in comparison with LAT.

43 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: The potential role of MWA as a valid first-line treatment for patients with small CRCLM is supported, and after adjusting for factors known to affect treatment choice, no significant difference in OS was shown after MWA versus resection forCRCLM.
Abstract: Introduction Many previous studies comparing liver resection versus thermal ablation for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) are subject to severe selection bias. The aim of this study was to compare survival after microwave ablation (MWA) versus liver resection for CRCLM in a population-based cohort study using propensity score analysis to reduce confounding by indication. Methods All patients undergoing liver resection or MWA as a first intervention for CRCLM measuring ≤ 3 cm between 2013 and 2016 in Sweden were included from a nationwide registry. Treatment effect was estimated after propensity score matching, adjusting for patient and tumour factors known to affect the choice of treatment approach. Descriptive, regression and survival statistics were applied. Results The unmatched cohorts (82 MWA patients, 645 resection patients) differed significantly regarding age, American Society of Anaesthesiologists class, Charlson comorbidity index, primary tumour location, number of metastases and previous chemotherapy, with 3-year overall survival (OS) favouring resection over MWA (76 and 69%, p = 0.005). After propensity score matching (70 MWA patients, 201 resection patients), no difference in 3-year OS was shown between resected and ablated patients (76% and 76%, p = 0.253), with a median OS of 54.7 (95% confidence interval 48.6 - 60.9) months and 48 (40.1–56.1) months, respectively. Conclusion After adjusting for factors known to affect treatment choice, no significant difference in OS was shown after MWA versus resection for CRCLM. This supports the potential role of MWA as a valid first-line treatment for patients with small CRCLM.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: Current surgical oncology guidelines should be utilised until further research from high quality trials enable the development of specific clinical practice guidelines, as there is no evidence-based guidelines for nutrition support specific to UGI cancer surgery.
Abstract: Background Malnutrition is highly prevalent in patients with Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer and is associated with poor outcomes. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines for nutrition support specific to UGI cancer surgery. Methods Databases including MEDLINE, PUBMED, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Central and Clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched. Abstracts of studies investigating the effect of preoperative nutrition support on nutritional status, functional status, body composition, quality of life and treatment outcomes in adult patients undergoing oesophageal, gastric or pancreatic cancer resection were identified. Screening of studies, quality assessment using the Downs and Black checklist, data extraction, and appraisal of evidence using GRADE were performed by two reviewers. Due to heterogeneity of the studies, results were synthesised narratively. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018111930). Results Nine studies with a total of 442 oesophageal and 418 gastric patients were included. Individualised dietary counselling, and enteral feeding in neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer demonstrated positive effects for weight maintenance and surgical complications, however the GRADE evidence quality was very low. Preoperative nutrition support in gastric cancer decreased the incidence of surgical site infections, length of stay and hospital costs, but GRADE assessment was unable to be completed due to only one study reporting on each outcome measure. Conclusions This review demonstrates the lack of strong evidence to determine the most optimal methods of nutrition support prior to UGI cancer resection. Current surgical oncology guidelines should be utilised until further research from high quality trials enable the development of specific clinical practice guidelines.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: Preoperative BMI and PNI and their postoperative changes are related to prognosis in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer and careful nutritional intervention after gastrectomy can improve prognosis.
Abstract: Introduction Preoperative body weight and nutritional status are related to prognosis in patients with gastric cancer; however, the prognostic impact of postoperative in these variables is unclear. We aimed to investigate the association of preoperative/postoperative body mass index (BMI) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) with prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Materials and methods We retrospectively 1868 patients with stage II/III gastric cancer treated with gastrectomy between January 2006 and December 2010. We divided the populations into 3 groups according to BMI; underweight, normal, and overweight. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to BMI (underweight, normal-weight, overweight). PNI was classified into low and high (cutoff value; 49.7). The association of preoperative BMI/PNI and their changes (6 months postoperatively) with clinicopathologic characteristics were evaluated. Results Preoperative underweight and low PNI were related to poor prognosis (log-rank p Conclusion Preoperative BMI and PNI and their postoperative changes are related to prognosis in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer. Careful nutritional intervention after gastrectomy can improve prognosis.

Journal ArticleDOI
17 Feb 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: LA shows a feasible, safe and superior treatment option for PHEO, because it provides superior perioperative and recovery outcomes without increasing complications.
Abstract: Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) vs open adrenalectomy (OA) for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). Methods A systematic literature research of PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and citation lists were performed to identify eligible studies. All studies comparing LA versus OA for PHEO were included. Results Overall, fourteen studies including 743 patients (LA 391; OA 352) were included. LA might have smaller tumor size (WMD -0.92 cm, 95% CI -1.09 to −0.76; p Conclusion LA shows a feasible, safe and superior treatment option for PHEO, because it provides superior perioperative and recovery outcomes without increasing complications.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: R2-resections do not result in a survival benefit compared to non-surgical treatment in this non-randomized series.
Abstract: Introduction The majority of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) present with extensive metastatic disease or an unresectable recurrence, and will be treated palliatively. Only a minority of patients will be eligible for potential cure by surgical treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of surgical treatment and non-surgical treatment of patients with LRRC. Methods All patients with LRRC referred to our tertiary institute between 2000 and 2015 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were discussed in a multidisciplinary tumour board (MDT) and eventually received curative surgical or non-surgical treatment. Overall survival (OS) was compared by resection margin status and non-surgical treatment. Results A total of 447 patients were discussed in our MDT of which 193 patients underwent surgical treatment and 254 patients received non-surgical treatment. Surgically treated patients were significantly younger, received less neoadjuvant therapy for the primary tumour, had less metastasis at diagnosis and more central recurrences. The 5-year OS was 51% for R0-resections and 34% for R1-resections. Although numbers with R2-resections were too small to implicate prognostic significance, there was no difference in 5-year OS between R2-resections and non-surgical treatment (10% vs. 4%, p = 0.282). In a subgroup analysis the OS of R2-patients was even poorer compared to optimal palliative treated patients with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (22 vs 29 months, p = 0.413). Conclusion R2-resections do not result in a survival benefit compared to non-surgical treatment in this non-randomized series. Patients with a high chance on a R2-resection could be offered non-surgical treatment, without local resection.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: The limited evidence suggests that ER is a more effective strategy for improving postoperative recovery without increasing the risk of surgery and recurrence in gastric GISTs, however, close attention should be paid to margin status after ER.
Abstract: The application of endoscopic resection (ER) in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) is controversial. We carried out a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficiency of ER with laparoscopic resection (LR) in patients with gastric GISTs. We searched PubMed to identify studies comparing ER with LR in GIST. The outcomes focused on two areas: safety, including operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, time to flatus, time to liquid, time to soft diet, and postoperative complications; and efficiency, including positive margin, recurrence, and long-term survival. A total of 1292 patients from 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Patients undergoing ER had a shorter operation time (standardised mean difference [SMD] −1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] −2.18 to −0.78) and shorter time to soft diet (SMD -1.02, 95% CI -1.52 to −0.52) than those undergoing LR. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of blood loss, length of hospital stay, time to flatus, time to liquid, and postoperative complications. ER was also associated with greater positive margins compared with LR (relative risk 6.32, 95% CI 1.41–28.26). There were no significant differences between ER and LR for recurrence and 5-year disease-free survival. The limited evidence suggests that ER is a more effective strategy for improving postoperative recovery without increasing the risk of surgery and recurrence in gastric GIST. However, close attention should be paid to margin status after ER.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Nov 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: Indocyanine green (ICG) as fluorescent agent provides a higher detection rate compared to blue dye for the SNP in a range of different tumor types, and a combination of both ICG and a radio-colloid is suggested.
Abstract: Sentinel node procedures (SNP) are performed with the use of tracer-agents, mainly radio-colloid and/or blue dye. Fluorescent agents have emerged as a new tracer-agent to identify the SLN intra-operatively with near-infrared imaging. Our aim is to compare the detection rate of fluorescent agents to current “golden standards” (blue dye and/or radio-colloid) for the SNP by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis without any restrictions based on tumor type. A systematic search in PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library was performed. Articles that compared the detection rates of fluorescent agents with radio-colloid and/or blue dye were included. Meta-analyses were performed for breast, gynecological and dermatological cancer using a random effects model. In total 6195 articles were screened which resulted in a final inclusion of 55 articles. All studies used indocyanine green (ICG) as fluorescent agent. Meta-analyses comparing ICG with blue dye showed a significant and clinically relevant difference in detection rate in favor of ICG, for both breast, dermatological and gynecological cancer. Meta-analyses comparing ICG with radio-colloid did not show any significant differences, with the exception of ICG versus radio-colloid + blue dye for the bilateral SLN detection in gynecological cancer. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging using ICG provides a higher detection rate compared to blue dye for the SNP in a range of different tumor types. SLN detection rates of ICG are comparable to radio-colloid. Due to their complementary characteristics in terms of spatial resolution and transdermal sensitivity, we suggest to use a combination of both ICG and a radio-colloid.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 May 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: MIS appears to be safe in the management of high-risk EC patients, showing better perioperative and postoperative outcomes and comparable oncological outcomes than open surgery.
Abstract: Objective To analyze all published studies comparing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with laparotomic one in the surgical treatment of high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) in term of operative, peri-operative and oncological outcomes. Data sources We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed between January 1995–March 2019. Methods of study selection Titles and abstracts were analyzed by two reviewers. A set of explicit criteria was used for selection of literature: 1) randomized controlled trials (RCT), prospective or retrospective cohort studies, given the rarity of this tumor and the concomitant lack of data in the form of large trials, all reviewed original report publications with an appropriate number of subjects were considered and included; 2) participants of interest being patients who have suffered from high risk EC 3) the outcome measures including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence, (4) English language, (5) abstract available. Results Thirty relevant articles were selected for full reading. For final analysis 20 studies were selected. Then, as second step, the full articles were evaluated to determine whether full inclusion criteria were met. In total, 9 papers were identified and included. Conclusion MIS appears to be safe in the management of high-risk EC patients, showing better perioperative and postoperative outcomes and comparable oncological outcomes than open surgery. Prospective randomized trial would be needed to confirm this data.

Journal ArticleDOI
17 Mar 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: Sarcopenia and myosteatosis predicts the need for institutional care after colorectal cancer surgery and increases the pneumonia and cardiorespiratory complication rates.
Abstract: Background The aim of this study was to evaluate whether sarcopenia or myosteatosis have an impact on short- and long-term results in patients who were surgically treated for colorectal cancer. Methods During 2007–2011 curatively treated colorectal cancer patients (n = 348) were included in the study. Clinical data was collected retrospectively from patient registers. Skeletal muscle mass was measured at the L3 level via venous-phase computed tomography and patients were divided into sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic and into myosteatotic and non-myosteatotic. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were analysed in these groups. Results Sarcopenia was found in 208 patients (59.8%) and myosteatosis was found in 108 patients (31.2%). Sarcopenia was associated with increased risk of postoperative pneumonia (6.7% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.021). Sarcopenic colon cancer patients had higher rate of cardiorespiratory complications than non-sarcopenic (6.3% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.023) and sarcopenic rectum cancer patients had more often pneumonia than non-sarcopenic (8.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.041). Discharge to home was less common in myosteatotic patients than in non-myosteatotic patients (47.7% vs. 76.9%, p Conclusions Sarcopenia increases the pneumonia and cardiorespiratory complication rates. Sarcopenia and myosteatosis predicts the need for institutional care after colorectal cancer surgery. Sarcopenia and myosteatosis seem to be negative factors for colorectal cancer patients’ survival. Myosteatosis is an independent risk factor for poor overall 5-year survival.

Journal ArticleDOI
06 Feb 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: In the context of SL, the patients with long PFI and low metastatic lymph node numbers at ILNR diagnosis have the best outcome, and the BRCA mutational status seems not associated with clinical variables and PSL-PFS, differently from other sites of disease in ROC patients.
Abstract: Objective This study is aimed to analyze the clinical outcome of recurrent ovarian cancer patients bearing isolated lymph-node recurrence (ILNR) who underwent salvage lymphadenectomy (SL). The prognostic role of clinicopathological variables and the mutational status of BRCA1/2 have also been investigated. Methods This retrospective, single-institutional study included women with platinum-sensitive lymph node recurrence underwent to SL between June 2008 and June 2018. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of clinical parameters, and BRCA1/2 mutational status on post salvage lymphadenectomy progression-free survival (PSL-PFS). Results As of June 2019, the median follow-up after SL was 30 months, and the relapse has been documented in 48 (56.5%) patients. In the whole series, the median PSL-PFS was 21 months, and the 3-year PSL-PFS was 36.7%. The median PSL-PFS, according to patients with ILNR (N = 71) versus patients with lymph-nodes and other sites of disease (N = 14), was 27 months versus 12 months, respectively. Univariate analysis of variables conditioning PSL-PFS showed that platinum-free interval (PFI) ≥12 months, normal Ca125 serum levels, and number of metastatic lymph-nodes ≤3 played a statistically significant favorable role. In multivariate analysis, PFI duration ≥12 months and the number of metastatic lymph nodes ≤3 were shown to keep their favorable, independent prognostic value on PSL-PFS. Conclusions In the context of SL, the patients with long PFI and low metastatic lymph node numbers at ILNR diagnosis have the best outcome. The BRCA mutational status seems not associated with clinical variables and PSL-PFS, differently from other sites of disease in ROC patients.

Journal ArticleDOI
07 May 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: Compared to emergency surgery, self-expanding metallic stent interventions improve short-term surgical outcomes, especially in the curative setting, but have similar long-term oncological and survival outcomes.
Abstract: Self-expanding metallic stent placement as a bridge to surgery has been reported as an alternative to emergency surgery for acute malignant colorectal obstruction. However, results from clinical trials and previous meta-analyses are conflicting. We carried out a meta-analysis to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes between emergency surgery and self-expanding metallic stents for malignant large bowel obstruction. Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched for prospective and randomised controlled trials. The outcomes of focus included 3- and 5-year overall and disease-free survival, overall tumour recurrence, overall complication and 30-day mortality rate, length of hospital and ICU stay, overall blood loss, number of patients requiring transfusion, total number of lymph nodes harvested, stoma and primary anastomosis rate. Twenty-seven studies were included with a total of 3894 patients. There was no significant difference in terms of 3-year and 5-year disease-free and overall survival. Stenting resulted in less blood loss (mean difference -234.72, P < 0.00001) and higher primary anastomosis rate (RR 1.25, P < 0.00001). For curative cases, bridge to surgery groups had lower 30-day mortality rate (RR 0.65, P = 0.01), lower overall complication rate (RR 0.65, P < 0.0001), more lymph nodes harvested (mean difference 2.51, P = 0.005), shorter ICU stay (mean difference -2.27, P = 0.02) and hospital stay (mean difference -7.24, 95% P < 0.0001). Compared to emergency surgery, self-expanding metallic stent interventions improve short-term surgical outcomes, especially in the curative setting, but have similar long-term oncological and survival outcomes.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jun 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: Targeted axillary dissection is a feasible technique following excellent response to NACT in selected patients with limited volume ALN metastasis, at diagnosis.
Abstract: Aim This study investigated whether wire localisation of the histologically proven positive, clipped axillary lymph node (ALN) with subsequent targeted axillary dissection (TAD) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) improves axillary staging in breast cancer. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with primary breast cancer and core biopsy proven metastatic ALNs, that had an excellent nodal radiological response following NACT, treated at our centre between January 2016 and December 2018. The initial cohort of patients (Group 1) underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), with a minimum of three nodes were sampled. The subsequent cohort (Group 2) had a marker clip inserted in the metastatic ALN prior to NACT. This cohort underwent wire guided excision of the clipped node in addition to SLNB, with a minimum of three nodes sampled. Results A total of 47 patients were identified. Group 1 comprised 22 patients with a sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rate (IR) of 95%. 25 patients (Group 2) underwent wire guided clip location and the SLN IR was 100% with a 92% clipped node IR. Evidence of pathological complete response (pCR) in the clipped node was associated with pCR in other nodes. Conclusion Targeted axillary dissection is a feasible technique following excellent response to NACT in selected patients with limited volume ALN metastasis, at diagnosis. The identification of the positive ALN during surgery is vital and the IR can be improved by clipping the node prior to NACT and wire guided localisation at the time of surgery.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Feb 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: The resection margin, when measured as a metric distance, correlates with a reduction in LR, and appears to be more significant on local control than radiotherapy.
Abstract: Objectives What constitutes an adequate margin of resection for infiltrative subtypes of soft-tissue sarcomas remains unclear. We aimed to determine the prognostic significance of the margin in millimetres for myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS). Methods 305 patients diagnosed with either a high-grade, localised MFS (n = 98) or UPS (n = 207) were included. The relationship of closest margin in millimetres to viable tumour and oncological outcomes was analysed. Results The overall local recurrence (LR) rate for all patients were 12%: 19% with positive margin and 10% with negative margin (p = 0.051). The LR rate was similar in patients with negative but Conclusion The resection margin, when measured as a metric distance, correlates with a reduction in LR, and appears to be more significant on local control than radiotherapy. To minimise the risk of LR, a margin distance of at least 10 mm is advocated for MFS and UPS.

Journal ArticleDOI
08 Jan 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: W&W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths.
Abstract: Introduction: The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Material and methods: Patients were included in a W&W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI showed a (near)clinical complete response. Patients underwent endoscopy and MRI every 3 months during the first year, and 6-monthly thereafter. Patients aged ≥75 and ≥ 2 years of follow-up (FU) were selected. Oncological outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Functional outcome was assessed with colostomy-free rate, Vaizey incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome-score and International Prostate Syndrome Score. Results: 43/304 (14%) of patients in a W&W-approach met the inclusion criteria. Median FU was 37 (24–109) months. 5/43(12%) developed a local regrowth. All were treated surgically, with one patient experiencing a pelvic failure. Distant metastases occurred in 3/43 patients and 4 patients died, 3 of whom not related to rectal cancer. The 3-year local regrowth-free rate was 88%, 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival 91%, overall survival 97% and 3-year colostomy-free rate 93%. Overall, the bowel- and urinary dysfunction scores at 3, 12 and 24 months indicated good continence, no or minor LARS and moderate urinary problems. Conclusion: W&W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths. Most patients can avoid major surgery and a definitive colostomy, and have a reasonable anorectal and urinary function.

Journal ArticleDOI
04 Jul 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: There is a substantial correlation between tumor grade at URS biopsy and the final pathology in upper tract urothelial carcinoma UTUC and a certain risk of undergrading and understaging should be assumed.
Abstract: Objective To assess the accuracy of ureteroscopic (URS) biopsies in predicting stage and grade at final pathology in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) Materials and methods The meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement Studies providing data on tumor stage and grade at URS biopsy and surgical specimens were included The negative predictive value (NPV) implies concordance between the absence of subepithelial connective tissue invasion or the presence of low-grade tumors at URS biopsy and the absence of a muscle-invasive disease in the final pathology Results A total of 23 studies were included (3547 patients) The stage-to-stage match between URS biopsy/final pathology showed a positive predictive value (PPV) for cT1+/muscle-invasive disease of 94% (95% CI: 84%–100%) and a NPV for cTa-Tis/non-muscle-invasive disease of 60% (95% CI: 52%–68%) The grade-to-grade match between URS biopsy/final pathology was 66% (95% CI: 55%–77%) for low-grade (cLG/pLG) tumors and 97% (95% CI: 94%–98%) for high-grade (cHG/pHG) tumors The PPV for cHG/muscle-invasive disease was 60% (95% CI: 54%–66%) and the NPV for cLG/non-muscle-invasive disease was 77% (95% CI: 73%–82%) The undergrading and understaging rates were 32% (95%CI: 25%–38%) and 46% (95% CI: 38%–54%), respectively Conclusions There is a substantial correlation between tumor grade at URS biopsy and the final pathology The identification of cHG tumors and subepithelial connective tissue invasion (cT1+) in URS biopsy showed a moderate and a strong correlation with invasive UTUC, respectively Nevertheless, a certain risk of undergrading and understaging should be assumed

Journal ArticleDOI
25 Apr 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: Electrochemotherapy has proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases, with a durable response, and provides local tumor control that enables patients with unresectable metastases to receive further treatments.
Abstract: Background and objectives A previous pilot study proved the feasibility, safety and efficacy of electrochemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term effectiveness and safety of electrochemotherapy in the treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Patients and methods In this prospective phase II study, patients with metachronous colorectal liver metastases were included. In all patients, at least one metastasis was unresectable due to its central location or a too-small future remnant liver volume. Patients were treated by electrochemotherapy using intravenously administered bleomycin during open surgery. Treated were 84 metastases in 39 patients. Local tumor control, progression-free survival and overall survival were evaluated. Results The objective response was 75% (63% CR, 12% PR). The median duration of the response was 20.8 months for metastases in CR and 9.8 months for metastases in PR. The therapy was significantly more effective for metastases smaller than 3 cm in diameter than for larger ones. There was no difference in response according to the metastatic location, i.e., metastases in central vs. peripheral locations. Progression-free survival was better in patients who responded well to electrochemotherapy compared to those metastases that had a partial response or progressive disease. However, there was no difference in overall survival, with a median of 29.0 months. Conclusions Electrochemotherapy has proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases, with a durable response. It provides local tumor control that enables patients with unresectable metastases to receive further treatments.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 May 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: Electrochemotherapy is an effective and durable treatment option for primary BCC and should be considered as part of the armamentarium of options available.
Abstract: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are the commonest cutaneous malignancy and incidence continues to increase. There is a need to expand the therapeutic toolbox to increase options for patients that are unsuitable for or unwilling to undergo the current therapies. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a technique where cells are temporarily permeabilized after exposure to a brief pulsed electrical field and combined with low dose chemotherapeutics to ablate malignancies. It is a simple technique causing minimal damage to the surrounding healthy tissue and has the potential to avoid the need for complex reconstruction. ECT is an established treatment for skin metastases but its role as a primary treatment modality is not demonstrated. A prospective randomised control trial evaluating ECT against the gold standard of treatment, Surgery, was performed for patients with primary BCC and patients followed for 5 years. All lesions treated with ECT (n = 69) responded although 8/69 (12%) needed a second treatment to ensure a complete response. All surgical lesions (n = 48) showed histological evidence of complete excision with 2/48 (4%) undergoing a second excision. At 5 years, in the surgical arm there was no evidence of recurrence in 39/40 (97.5%) lesions with 1/40 (2.5%) confirmed recurrence. In the ECT arm there was no evidence of recurrence in 42/48 lesions (87.5%). There was 5 confirmed recurrences. These groups show statistical equivalence in this non inferiority study design (p = 0.33). ECT is an effective and durable treatment option for primary BCC and should be considered as part of the armamentarium of options available.

Journal ArticleDOI
02 Apr 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: Post-operative morbidity affected both short-term and OS outcomes after hepatectomy for HCC, and Hepatitis B, higher ASA scores, elevated preoperative APRI and increased blood loss were found to predict a higher likelihood of developing complications.
Abstract: Introduction Although hepatectomy is the mainstay of curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), post-operative complications remain high. Presently there is conflicting data on the impact of morbidity on oncologic outcomes. We sought to identify predictors for the occurrence of post-hepatectomy complications, as well as to analyse the impact on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Materials and methods We performed a retrospective review of 888 patients who underwent resection for HCC from 2001 to 2016 in our institution. Results A total of 237 patients (26.7%) developed 254 complications of Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥2. Hepatitis B (p = 0.0397), elevated ASA score (p = 0.0002), higher platelet counts (p = 0.0277), raised pre-operative APRI scores (p = 0.0105) and bloodloss (p Conclusion Post-operative morbidity affected both short-term and OS outcomes after hepatectomy for HCC. Hepatitis B, higher ASA scores, elevated preoperative APRI and increased blood loss were found to predict a higher likelihood of developing complications. This may potentially be mitigated by careful patient selection and adopting strict measures to minimise intraoperative bleeding.

Journal ArticleDOI
06 Mar 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: In European clinical practice for rectal GIST, LTR, LAR and APR have comparable local control,Multimodal approach is higher and tumour rupture less frequent in specialist centres compared to general hospitals.
Abstract: Background Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are rare tumours. Variability in the management may influence outcome, but there is a lack of understanding regarding contemporary variance in care. A multicenter, international, retrospective cohort study was performed to elucidate characteristics and outcomes of rectal GIST in European practice, with particular reference to surgical approach. Methods All rectal GIST patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2018 were identified from five European databases. Recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Possible confounders were identified using Cox regression analyses. Results From 210 patients, 155 patients had surgery. The three main types of surgery were local tumour resection (LTR, n = 46), low anterior resection (LAR, n = 31) and abdomino-perineal resection (APR, n = 32). Most patients received neoadjuvant (65%) and/or adjuvant imatinib therapy (66%). Local recurrence rate after surgery was 15% and overall recurrence rate 28%. No significant differences were found in terms of RFS nor OS between LTR, LAR and APR. However, locally resected tumours were smaller, while LAR and APR patients more often received perioperative imatinib. General hospitals treated smaller GISTs, offered imatinib less frequently, and had a higher tumour rupture rate. In the multivariate analysis in the group having LTR, APR or LAR, the only significant prognostic factor for local recurrence was higher age (HR 1.06, CI 1.00–1.12, p = 0.048). Conclusions In European clinical practice for rectal GIST, LTR, LAR and APR have comparable local control. Multimodal approach is higher and tumour rupture less frequent in specialist centres compared to general hospitals.

Journal ArticleDOI
30 May 2020-Ejso
TL;DR: An international panel of PIPAC experts created by means of a consensus meeting a structured 2-day training course including essential theoretical content and practical exercises enabling participants to safely implement PIPac.
Abstract: Background PIPAC is a novel mode of intraperitoneal drug delivery for patients with peritoneal cancer (PC). PIPAC is a safe treatment with promising oncological results. Therefore, a structured training program is needed to maintain high standards and to guarantee safe implementation. Methods An international panel of PIPAC experts created by means of a consensus meeting a structured 2-day training course including essential theoretical content and practical exercises. For every module, learning objectives were defined and structured presentations were elaborated. This structured PIPAC training program was then tested in five courses. Results The panel consisted of 12 experts from 11 different centres totalling a cumulative experience of 23 PIPAC courses and 1880 PIPAC procedures. The final program was approved by all members of the panel and includes 12 theoretical units (45 min each) and 6 practical units including dry-lab and live surgeries. The panel finalized and approved 21 structured presentations including the latest evidence on PIPAC and covering all mandatory topics. These were organized in 8 modules with clear learning objectives to be tested by 12 multiple-choice questions. Lastly, a structured quantifiable (Likert scale 1–5) course evaluation was created. The new course was successfully tested in five courses with 85 participants. Mean overall satisfaction with the content was rated at 4.79 (±0.5) with at 4.71 (±0.5) and at 4.61 (±0.7), respectively for course length and the balance between theory and practice. Conclusions The proposed PIPAC training program contains essential theoretical background and practical training enabling the participants to safely implement PIPAC.