Showing papers in "EMS world in 2015"

A National Perspective on Ambulance Crashes and Safety. Guidance from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on ambulance safety for patients and providers.

Abstract: A mbulance safety has special significance to the staff at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and its Office of Emergency Medical Services. As current or former EMTs, paramedics, firefighters, emergency nurses and state EMS officials, many of us have spent time in ambulances and routinely respond to traffic crashes. The people at NHTSA all work to advance emergency medical services by collecting and analyzing critical EMS data and by leading collaborative efforts among national, state and local organizations engaged in improving EMS nationwide. But we serve a broader mission as well: keeping people safe on our nation’s roadways. The incredible story of an ambulance crash in Minnesota (see “A Profound Impact” on page 84) demCRASH INVESTIGATIONS

Surgical cricothyrotomies in prehospital care. Surgical airway placement is indicated when you cannot intubate or ventilate.

Abstract: Managing the airway does not mean intubation, it means managing the airway. Allowing a patient to breathe on their own with appropriate positioning, bag-valve ventilation and blind insertion devices are all airway management options. The surgical cricothyrotomy is a rare and life-saving procedure when managing patients who are in a "can't intubate, can't ventilate" situation. These patients will die without aggressive and rapid intervention. While not all surgical cricothyrotomies provide a definitive airway, the needle cricothyrotomy is an ineffective means for ventilation and its use is discouraged. Understand the techniques used in your program and that are within your scope of practice as an EMS provider. Provide your patient the best opportunity for survival by knowing your program's surgical airway procedure thoroughly, and practice it regularly.

The payers perspective on MIH-CP programs. How to make a case for funding your project.

Abstract: Here are some key points to consider when engaging in conversations with potential payers for EMS-based MIH-CP programs. The realignment of fiscal incentives within the healthcare system has created an environment that encourages providers and payers to work together to right-size utilization. Providers and payers are often unaware of the true value EMS agencies can bring to their patients through proactive and innovative patient navigation services. You need to tell them--or, better yet, show them. You may need to do a small demonstration project with a handful of patients to prove you can make a difference. In order to understand the new environment, you need to become well-versed in healthcare metrics, specifically as they relate to the partners to whom you'll be proposing. Be sure you know things like readmission rates and penalties, value-based purchasing penalties, HCAHPS scores, MSPB and other motivating factors you. can use to help build the business case for your audience. For many in EMS, crafting partnerships for. payment of services not related to ambulance transport is a new and scary thing. Hopefully the examples provided here from payers paying for MIH services have demonstrated that their perspective is not much different from ours. We are all trying to do the right things for our patients, improve their experience of care and reduce the cost of the healthcare system.

Busting top trauma myths. Exploring best practices for prehospital trauma care.

Abstract: Evidence-based medicine will continually change the paradigm in which emergency medicine is practiced. Fifteen years ago tourniquets were a last resort and often considered a guaranteed way to lose a limb; today they are a gold standard in hemorrhage control. Believing in, and having practiced, medicine we later learn to be false doesn't make someone a bad provider, nor does it make them wrong. It simply means emergency medicine and EMS will continue to develop as a profession, and our body of evidence will continue to grow as we learn more about prehospital care. As we prepare to retire MAST, backboards and lidocaine, and realize the golden hour as a concept rather than a definitive 60 minutes, it's important to keep a critical eye out for the next intervention that truly will help patients during their prehospital care.

Is it time to stop chilling? Induced therapeutic hypothermia doesn't appear to have the prehospital effect we thought it did.

Abstract: The evidence is quite clear that ITH in the prehospital setting is of dubious benefit. But what is the harm in continuing the practice? Well, prehospital ITH most likely takes away from more beneficial therapies such as high-quality CPR, rapid defibrillation, recognition of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and similar essential treatments. Several studies have shown prehospital ITH, in many cases, delays hospital transport. When the initial studies of ITH were released, I was immediately on the ITH bandwagon. Interestingly, the American Heart Association (AHA) has never recommended prehospital ITH. Even the position paper on ITH by the National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) was cautious, saying, "A lack of evidence on induced hypothermia in the prehospital setting currently precludes recommending this treatment modality as standard of care for all emergency medical services (EMS) patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. A systematic review of ITH recently published states, "In cardiac arrest, the initiation of therapeutic hypothermia in the out-of-hospital environment has not been shown to improve neurologic outcomes, although studies to date have been limited. We now know that caution Fxercised by the AHA and preMSP was appropriate. One medmy mentors in residency and ays said, "Never be the first- Univtor to prescribe a new drug or of Mlast doctor to prescribe an old is th" Lik" many things in EMS, EMS tms something that was put in Practe with good intent but lim- scientific evidence. We now P ITH is probably not a good ice and it is time to abandon it. However, we should still carry chilled IV fluids for hyperthermia, excited delirium and to main- tainormothermia in patients in cardiac arrest where transport times are long.