scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 1046-3283

European Review of Social Psychology 

Taylor & Francis
About: European Review of Social Psychology is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Social identity theory & Social psychology (sociology). It has an ISSN identifier of 1046-3283. Over the lifetime, 308 publications have been published receiving 42371 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a meta-analysis of meta-analyses is used to quantify the intention-behavior gap and a conceptual analysis of intention discrepancy is presented, and the scope of the intention construct is discussed in light of recent evidence concerning the role of habits and automaticity in human behavior.
Abstract: This chapter addresses two questions; how big is the “gap” between intentions and behavior, and what psychological variables might be able to “bridge” the intention–behavior gap? A meta-analysis of meta-analyses is used to quantify the gap and a conceptual analysis of intention–behavior discrepancies is presented. Research is described on the extent to which four groups of variables—behavior type, intention type, properties of intention, and cognitive and personality variables—moderate intention–behavior relations. Finally, the scope of the intention construct is discussed in the light of recent evidence concerning the role of habits and automaticity in human behavior.

2,996 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the intention-to-behavior process is analyzed with respect to implementation intentions, which link an intended goal-directed behavior to an anticipated situational context, and induce direct (automatic) control of the intended behavior through these cues.
Abstract: The intention-to-behavior process is analyzed with respect to implementation intentions. These intentions link an intended goal-directed behavior to an anticipated situational context. The reported experimental evidence suggests that implementation intentions create a heightened accessibility of the mental representation of the specified situational cues and induce direct (automatic) control of the intended behavior through these cues. The formation of implementation intentions promotes goal achievement through both of these processes because they eliminate classic problems associated with the control of goal-directed action. Similarities and differences to other theoretical approaches on intentions, planning, and action control are discussed.

1,571 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors re-examine, in light of recent developments, the reasoned action perspective inherent in the expectancy-value model of attitude and in the theory of planned behavior.
Abstract: The chapter re-examines, in light of recent developments, the reasoned action perspective inherent in the expectancy-value model of attitude and in the theory of planned behavior. According to this perspective, people's attitudes follow spontaneously and consistently from beliefs accessible in memory and then guide corresponding behavior. The number and types of beliefs that are accessible vary with motivation and ability to process attitude-relevant information and with the context. Based on these considerations, it is shown that the reasoned action perspective is compatible with evidence for automatic processes in the activation of attitudes and behavior, and with the finding that attitudes can vary with the context in which they are expressed. Implications for the attitude-behavior relation and for the role of habit in human behavior are discussed.

1,442 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This chapter introduces the common ingroup identity model, which proposes that bias can be reduced by factors that transform members' perceptions of group boundaries from “us” and “them” to a more inclusive “the authors”.
Abstract: This chapter introduces the common ingroup identity model as a means of reducing intergroup bias. This model proposes that bias can be reduced by factors that transform members' perceptions of group boundaries from “us” and “them” to a more inclusive “we”. From this perspective, several features specified by the contact hypothesis (e.g. co-operative interaction) facilitate more harmonious intergroup interactions, at least in part, because they contribute to the development of a common ingroup identity. In this chapter, we describe laboratory and field studies that are supportive of the model; we also relate the model to earlier work on aversive racism.

1,212 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects in evaluations was discussed in this paper, where Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity Effects.
Abstract: (1990). Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity Effects. European Review of Social Psychology: Vol. 1, European Review of Social Psychology, pp. 33-60.

996 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202310
20227
202120
202011
20198
20189